Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Mobile Networks and Applications
Erschienen in: Mobile Networks and Applications 3/2010

01.06.2010

Proposed Framework for Evaluating Quality of Experience in a Mobile, Testbed-oriented Living Lab Setting

verfasst von: Katrien De Moor, Istvan Ketyko, Wout Joseph, Tom Deryckere, Lieven De Marez, Luc Martens, Gino Verleye

Erschienen in: Mobile Networks and Applications | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The framework presented in this paper enables the evaluation of Quality of Experience (QoE) in a mobile, testbed-oriented Living Lab setting. As a result, it fits within the shift towards more user-centric approaches in innovation research and aims to bridge the gap between technical parameters and human experience factors. In view of this, Quality of Experience is seen as a multi-dimensional concept, which should be considered from an interdisciplinary perspective. Although several approaches for evaluating perceived QoE have been proposed in the past, they tend to focus on a limited number of objective dimensions and fail to grasp the subjective counterparts of users’ experiences. We therefore propose a distributed architecture for monitoring network Quality of Service (QoS), context information and subjective user experience based on the functional requirements related to real-time experience measurements in real-life settings. This approach allows us to evaluate all relevant QoE-dimensions in a mobile context.
Vorheriger Artikel Automated Troubleshooting of a UMTS-WLAN Test Platform
Nächster Artikel A Kerberized Architecture for Fast Re-authentication in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Crisler K, Turner T, Aftelak A, Visciola M, Steinhage A, Anneroth M et al (2004) Considering the user in the wireless world. IEEE Commun Mag 42:56–62CrossRef
2.
Haddon L, Mante E, Sapio B, Kommonen K-H, Fortunati L, Kant A (eds) (2005) Everyday innovators: researching the role of users in shaping ICT’s. Springer, Dordrecht
3.
Cabral A (2007) Quality of experience: a conceptual essay. In: Wang W, Wang W (eds) IFIP international federation for information processing, volume 252, integration and innovation. Springer, Boston, pp 193–199
4.
De Marez L, De Moor K (2007) The challenge of user- and QoE-centric research and product development in today’s ICT environment. Observatorio (OBS*) 1(3):1–22
5.
Rickards T (2003) The future of innovation research. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1094–1100CrossRef
6.
Trott P (2003) Innovation and market research. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Elsevier, Oxford, pp 835–844CrossRef
7.
8.
Kumar K (2005) A marriage made in QoE heaven. CED Magazine, July 2005, 37–39
9.
10.
Kilkki K (2008) Quality of experience in communications ecosystem. J Univers Comput Sci 14(5):615–624
11.
De Marez L, Verleye G (2004) Innovation diffusion: the need for more accurate consumer insight. Illustration of the PSAP scale as a segmentation instrument. J Target Meas Anal Market 13(1):32–49CrossRef
12.
Veryzer RW, Borja de Mozota B (2005) The impact of user-oriented design on new product development: an examination of fundamental relationships. J Prod Innovat Manag 22(2):128–143CrossRef
13.
Väätäjä H (2008) Factors affecting user experience in mobile systems and services. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human-Computer Interaction with mobile devices and services, 551–551
14.
Knoche H, Papaleo M, Sasse MA, Vanelli-Coralli A (2007) The Kindest Cut: Enhancing the User Experience of Mobile TV through Adequate Zooming. Proceedings of the 15th ACM International conference on Multimedia, 87–96.
15.
De Koning TC, Veldhoven P, Knoche H, Rooij RE (2007) Of MOS and men: bridging the gap between objective and subjective quality measurements in mobile TV. In Creutzburg R, Takala JH, Cai J (Eds) Multimedia on Mobile Devices 2007: Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 6507, 65070P
16.
Singh K, Schulzrinne H (2005) Peer-to-peer internet telephony using SIP. Proceedings of the international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, 63–68
17.
Verkasalo H (2008) Contextual patterns in mobile service usage. J Pers Ubiquit Comput 13(5):331–342CrossRef
18.
Tsai CC, Lee G, Raab F, Norman GJ, Sohn T, Griswold WG, Patrick K (2007) Usability and feasability of PmEB: a mobile phone application for monitoring real time caloric balance. Mob Netw Appl 12(2–3):173–184CrossRef
19.
Ballon P, Pierson J, Delaere S (2007) Fostering innovation in networked communications: test and experimentation platforms for broadband systems. In: Heilesen SB, Siggaard Jensen S (eds) Designing for networked communications—strategies and development. Hershey (PA), London, pp 137–166
20.
Intille SS, Tapia EM, Rondoni J, Beaudin J, Kukla C, Agarwal S et al (2003) Tools for studying behavior and technology in natural settings. In: Dey AK, Schmidt A, McCarthy JF (eds) UbiComp 2003. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 157–174
21.
Følstad A (2008) Towards a living lab for the development of online community services. Electron J Virtual Organ Netw 10:47–58
22.
Ponce de Leon M, Eriksson M, Balasubramaniam S, Donelly W (2006) Creating a distributed mobile networking testbed environment—through the Living Labs approach. Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE/Create-Net Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, 135–139.
23.
Perkis A, Munkeby S, Hillestad OI (2006) A model for measuring quality of experience. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium (NORSIG 2006), 189–201
24.
Fehnert B, Kosagowsky A (2008) Measuring user experience—complementing qualitative and quantitative assessment. Proceedings of the 10th International conference on Human-Computer Interaction with mobile devices and services, 383–386
25.
Schmidt A, Strohbach M, van Laerhoven K, Friday A, Gellersen H-W (2002) Context acquisition based on load sensing. In: Boriello G, Holmquist LE (eds) Lecture notes in computer science 2498. Springer, Berlin, pp 333–350
26.
Niitamo V-P, Kulkki S, Eriksson MH (2006) State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Proceedings of the 12the International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, 349–357
27.
Henderson T, Anthony DA (2005) Measuring wireless network usage with the experience sampling method. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Wireless Network Measurements, Trentino, Italy
28.
Andrews M, Cao J, McGowan J (2006) Measuring human satisfaction in data networks. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, 1–12.
29.
Reichl P (2007) From ‘Quality-of-Service’ and ‘Quality-of-Design’ to ‘Quality-of-Experience’: A holistic view on future interactive telecommunication services. Proceedings of the 15th International conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, 2007, 1–6.
30.
Lopez D, Gonzalez F, Bellido L, Alonso A (2006) Adaptive multimedia streaming over IP based on customer oriented metrics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Networks, 185–191.
31.
32.
33.
Siller M, Woods JC (2003) QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission. Proceedings of the International Conference on Visual Information Engineering, 238–241
34.
35.
Soldani D (2006) Means and methods for collecting and analyzing QoE measurements in wireless networks. Proceedings of the International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, 531–535
36.
Eberle W, Bougard B, Pollin S, Catthoor F (2005) From myth to methodology: cross-layer design for energy-efficient wireless communication. Proceedings of the 42nd Design Automation Conference, 303–308.
37.
Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding Experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of the DIS04 Conference, 261–268
38.
Gaggioli A, Bassi M, Delle Fave A (2003) Quality of experience in virtual environments. In: Riva G, Davide F, Ijsselsteijn WA (eds) Being there: concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. Ios, Amsterdam, pp 122–136
39.
Alben L (1996) Defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions 3(3):11–15CrossRef
40.
Arhippainen L (2003) Capturing user experience for product design. In Laukkanen S, Sarpola S (Ed) Electronic Proceedings of the 26th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (1–10)
41.
Vyas D, Van Der Veer GC (2005) Experience as ‘meaning’: creating communicating and maintaining in real-spaces. Proceedings of the Tenth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–4
42.
Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N (2006) User experience—a research agenda. Behav Inf Technol 25(2):91–97CrossRef
43.
Blythe MA, Overbeeke K, Monk AF (2004) Funology: usability to enjoyment (Human-Computer Interaction). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
44.
McNamara N, Kirakowski J (2005) Defining usability: quality of use or quality of experience? Proceedings of the Professional Communication Conference 2005, 200–204
45.
Abowd G, Mynatt E, Rodden T (2002) The human experience [of ubiquitous computing]. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1:48–57CrossRef
46.
Roto V (2006) Web browsing on mobile phones—characteristics of user experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Technology, Helsinki
47.
48.
McNamara N, Kirakowski J (2006) Functionality, usability and user experience: three areas of concern. Interactions 13(6):26–28CrossRef
49.
ITU-T (1994) ITU-T Recommendation E.800. Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. International Telecommunication Union, CH-Geneva. ITU-T Recommendation E.800. Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. International Telecommunication Union, CH-Geneva. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union
50.
Sullivan M, Pratt J, Kortum P (2008) Practical issues in subjective video quality evaluation: human factors vs. psychophysical image quality evaluation. Proceedings of UXTV 2008, 1–4
51.
da Silva AP, Varela M, de Souza e Silva E, Leão RM, Rubino G (2008) Quality assessment of interactive voice applications. Comput Netw 52(6):1179–1192CrossRef
52.
53.
Li-yuan L, Wen-an Z, Jun-de S (2006) The research of quality of experience evaluation method in pervasive computing environment. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, 178–182
54.
Díaz A, Merino P, Rivas FJ (2008) Customer-centric measurements on mobile phones. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE 2008), 1–4
55.
Wheeler L, Reis H (1991) Self-recording of everyday life events: origins, types, and uses. J Personal 59(3):339–354CrossRef
56.
Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E (2003) Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol 54(1):579–616CrossRef
57.
Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R (1987) Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. J Nerv Ment Dis 175(9):526–536CrossRef
58.
Consolvo S, Harrison B, Smith I, Chen M, Everitt K, Froehlich J et al (2007) Conducting in situ evaluations for and with ubiquitous technologies. Int J Hum Comput Interact 22(1–2):103–118CrossRef
59.
60.
De Moor K, Berte K, De Marez L, Joseph W, Deryckere T, Martens L (2009) User involvement in living lab research: experiences from an interdisciplinary study on future mobile applications. Proceedings of the Third International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis, 103–104
61.
62.
Mäkelä J-P, Pahlavan K (2005) Performance of neural network handoff algorithm under varying mobile velocities. Proceedings of the 2005 Finnish Signal Processing Symposium (FINSIG’05), 42–45
63.
Schmitt J, Hollick M, Roos C, Steinmetz R (2008) Adapting the user context in realtime: tailoring online machine learning algorithms to ambient computing. Mobile Netw Appl 13(6):583–598CrossRef
64.
Soldani D, Li M, Cuny R (2006) QoS and QoE Management in UMTS Cellular Systems. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
65.
Verkasalo H (2005) Handset-based monitoring of mobile customer behavior. Master’s Thesis Series. Networking Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Telecommunications. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology
66.
67.
68.
Hornsby A, Bangash S, Benchimol S, Defee I (2008) An approach to handover between DVB-H and Wi-Fi networks. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, 1–8
69.
Huang S-M, Wu Q, Lin Y-B, Yeh C-H (2006) SIP mobility and IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack supports in 3G IP multimedia subsystem: Research Articles. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 6(5):543–739CrossRef
70.
Calvagna A, Di Modica G (2004) A user-centric analysis of vertical handovers. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots, 137–146
71.
Kim HJ, Lee DH, Lee JM, Lee KH, Lyu W, Choi SG (2008) The QoE evaluation method through the QoS-QoE correlation model. Proceedings of the 2008 Fourth International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, 719–725
72.
73.
Piamrat K, Ksentini A, Viho C, Bonnin J-M (2008) QoE-based network selection for multimedia users in IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, 388–394
74.
Bharatula NB, Tröster G (2006) On-body context recognition with miniaturized autonomous sensor button. Proceedings of 4 th GMM Workshop on Energieautarke Sensorik, 621–628
75.
Stägera M, Lukowiczb P, Tröster G (2007) Power and accuracy trade-offs in sound-based context recognition systems. Perv Mob Comput 3(3):300–327CrossRef
76.
De Pessemier T (2008) Proposed architecture and algorithm for personalized advertising on iDTV and mobile devices. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 54(2):709–713CrossRef
77.
78.
79.
Metadaten
Titel
Proposed Framework for Evaluating Quality of Experience in a Mobile, Testbed-oriented Living Lab Setting
verfasst von
Katrien De Moor
Istvan Ketyko
Wout Joseph
Tom Deryckere
Lieven De Marez
Luc Martens
Gino Verleye
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2010
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Mobile Networks and Applications / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1383-469X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8153
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-010-0223-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Mobile Networks and Applications 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Dynamic Rate and FEC Adaptation for Video Multicast in Multi-rate Wireless Networks

OriginalPaper

Integration of 3G Connectivity in PlanetLab Europe

OriginalPaper

A Testbed for Energy Profile Characterization of IP Services in Smartphones over Live Networks

OriginalPaper

Trends, Advances, and Challenges in Testbed-based Wireless Mesh Network Research

OriginalPaper

Utility Function Selection for Streaming Videos with a Cognitive Engine Testbed

OriginalPaper

Automated Troubleshooting of a UMTS-WLAN Test Platform

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise