Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive interaction support in ambient-aware environments based on quality of context information

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ambient-aware environments are technologically augmented with myriad sensors, devices and other emerging services in order to support users. However, users find it complex in interacting with such environments due to the presence of numerous devices and services. In this situation, providing context-aware implicit or automatic interaction support may help reducing the cognitive load of the users and facilitate easy access of the available devices and services. However, due to the imprecision in context information, implicit interactions performed by the environment often leads to mis-automation. The result of such impaired implicitness causes distrust and dissatisfaction to the user. In order to address this issue, we propose a system that considers quality of information to dynamically adjust the level of implicit interaction and allows a system to operate in different modes such as full-automation, action suggestion, simple notification, or null action. We conduct experiment in a smart home scenario in order to elicit users’ acceptance and trust regarding the proposed system. Our experiment shows that dynamic and alternative mode of interaction not only increases the satisfaction of users but also helps to avoid distrust in automated actions carried out by the environment under varying contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarts E (2004) Ambient intelligence: a multimedia perspective. IEEE Multimed 11(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aarts E, de Ruyter B (2009) New research perspectives on ambient intelligence. J Intell Smart Environ 1(1):5–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen J, Guinn C, Horvtz E (1999) Mixed-initiative interaction. IEEE Intell Syst Their Appl 14(5):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barkhuus L, Dey A (2003) Is context-aware computing taking control away from the user? three levels of interactivity examined. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp conference. LNCS 2864, pp 149–156

  5. Brumitt B, Meyers B, Krumm J, Kern A, Shafer S (2000) Easyliving: technologies for intelligent environments. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on handheld and ubiquitous computing, pp 12–29

  6. Buchholz T, Küpper A, Schiffers M (2003) Quality of context: what it is and why we need it. In: Workshop of the HP OpenView University Association (HPOVUA). Geneva, pp 11–18

  7. Cook F, Youngblood M, Heierman III EO, Gopalratnam K, Rao S, Litvin A, Khawaja F (2003) Mavhome: an agent-based smart home. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2003), pp 521–524

  8. Damián-Reyes P, Favela J, Contreras-Castillo J (2011) Uncertainty management in context-aware applications: increasing usability and user trust. Wirel Pers Commun 56:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Vries P, Midden C, Bouwhuis D (2003) The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. Int J Human-Comput Stud 58:719–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dey A (2001) Understanding and using context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 5(1):4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dey A, Newberger A (2009) Support for context-aware intelligibility and control. In: CHI ’09: proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 859–868

  12. Dey AK, Mankoff J (2005) Designing mediation for context-aware applications. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12(1):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Encarnação JL (2007) HEI!—the human environment interaction. In: Human interface and the management of information. Methods, techniques and tools in information design. Springer, Berlin, pp 623–631

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Endsley M (1996) Automation and human performance—theory and application, chap. automation and situation awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, USA, pp 163–181

    Google Scholar 

  15. Helal S, Mann W, El-Zabadani H, King J, Kaddoura Y, Jansen E (2005) The gator tech smart house: a programmable pervasive space. Computer 38(3):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Horvitz E (1999) Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In: CHI ’99: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 159–166

  17. Hossain MA (2011) A framework for adaptive interaction support based on quality of context information. In: IEEE ICME workshop on Ambient Interactive Multimedia Environment (AIME), pp 1–6

  18. Hossain MA, Atrey PK, El Saddik A (2011) Modeling and assessing quality of information in multi-sensor multimedia monitoring systems. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl 7(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hossain MA, Parra J, Atrey PK, El Saddik A (2009) A framework for human-centered provisioning of ambient media services. Multimed Tools Appl 44(3):407–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jian J, Bisantz A, Drury C (2005) Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int J Cogn Ergon 4(1):53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kidd CD, Orr R, Abowd GD, Atkeson CG, Essa IA, MacIntyre B, Mynatt E, Starner TE, Newstetter W (1999) The aware home: a living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Cooperative Buildings, vol 1670. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, pp 190–197

  22. Lim BY, Dey AK (2011) Investigating intelligibility for uncertain context-aware applications. In: UbiComp, pp 415–424

  23. Manzoor A, Truong H, Dustdar S (2009) Using quality of context to resolve conflicts in context-aware systems. In: Rotherman K et al (eds) 1st international workshop on Quality of Context (QuaCon), vol. LNCS 5786. Springer, Stuttgart, pp 144–155

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nakamura EF, Loureiro AAF, Frery AC (2007) Information fusion for wireless sensor networks: methods, models, and classifications. ACM Comput Surv 39(3):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parasuraman R, Sheridan T, Wickens C (2000) A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Humans 30:286–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin W, Zhang D, Shi Y, Du K (2008) Combining user profiles and situation contexts for spontaneous service provision in smart assistive environments. In: 5th international conference on ubiquitous intelligence and computing. Oslo, Norway, pp 187–200

  27. Ranganathan A, Al-Muhtadi J, Campbell R (2004) Reasoning about uncertain contexts in pervasive computing environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(2):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt A (2000) Implicit human computer interaction through context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 4(2):191–199

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen HW (1999) There is more to context than location. Comput Graph 23(6):893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shafer SAN, Brumitt B, Cadiz JJ (2001) Interaction issues in context-aware intelligent environments. Hum-Comput Interact 16(2):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheikh K, Wegdam M, van Sinderen M (2008) Quality-of-context and its use for protecting privacy in context aware systems. J Softw 3(3):83–93

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sheridan T (2002) Humans and automation: system design and research issues. Wiley, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shirehjini AAN (2004) A novel interaction metaphor for personal environment control: direct manipulation of physical environment based on 3D visualization. Comput Graph 28:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shirehjini AAN (2008) Interaktion in ambient intelligence—konzeption eines intuitiven assistenten zur ganzheitlichen und konfliktfreien interaktion in adaptiven umgebungen. PhD thesis, Technischen Universität Darmstadt

  35. Spiekermann S (2008) User control in ubiquitous computing: design alternatives and user acceptance. Shaker Verlag

  36. Villar N, Kortuem G, Laerhoven KV, Schmidt A (2005) The pendle: a wearable mediator for mixed initiative environment. In: The IEE international workshop on intelligent environments (IE 05). University of Essex, Colchester, UK, pp 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  37. X10 (industry standard) (2009) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X10_(industry_standard). Accessed 20 Feb 2011

  38. Yu Z, Zhou X, Zhang D, Chin C, Wang X, Men J (2006) Supporting context-aware media recommendations for smart phones. IEEE Pervasive Computing 5(3):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmer T (2006) QoC: quality of context—improving the performance of context-aware applications. In: Advances in pervasive computing. Dublin, Ireland, pp 209–214

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through the research group project No RGP-VPP-049.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Anwar Hossain.

Additional information

Prof. El Saddik is also an honorary visiting professor at King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossain, M.A., Shirehjini, A.A.N., Alghamdi, A.S. et al. Adaptive interaction support in ambient-aware environments based on quality of context information. Multimed Tools Appl 67, 409–432 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1008-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1008-1

Keywords

Navigation