Abstract
In this paper, the simplest kinematical models of triangular plate finite elements using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) are considered. The ANCF is the finite element approach for simulating large displacements and rotations, in which the nodal position vectors and their derivatives are described in the inertial frame only. This leads to linear kinematics of elements, constant mass matrix and simple expressions for inertia terms in the equations of motion. The elastic forces appear in the ANCF in highly nonlinear form due to using the Green–Lagrange strain tensor. This fact compels researchers to find possibilities of reducing the computational complexity in using the ANCF. One of the ways in this direction is to use simplest fully-parameterized plate elements employing transverse slopes only, without using longitudinal slopes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shabana, A.A.: Definition of the slopes and the finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1(3#5), 339–348 (1997)
Dibold, M., Gerstmayr, J., Irschik, H.: On the accuracy and computational costs of the absolute nodal coordinate and the floating frame of reference formulation in deformable multibody systems. In: Proceedings of the IDETC/CIE 2007, ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Paper Number DETC2007-34756, Las Vegas (NV), USA, 4–7 September 2007
Gerstmayr, J., Shabana, A.A.: Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 45(1#A), 109–130 (2006)
Kerkkänen, K., García-Vallejo, D., Mikkola, A.: Modeling of belt-drives using a large deformation finite element formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 43(3#2), 239–256 (2006)
Sugiyama, H., Escalona, J.L., Shabana, A.A.: Formulation of three-dimensional joint constraints using the absolute nodal coordinates. Nonlinear Dyn. 31(2#4), 167–195 (2003)
Matikainen, M., Dmitrochenko, O., Mikkola, A.: Beam elements with trapezoidal cross-section deformation modes based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. of Num. Analysis & Appl. Math., Rhodes, Greece. American Inst. of Physics Conf. Proc., vol. 1281, pp. 1262–1265 (2010)
Dmitrochenko, O., Mikkola, A.: Extended digital nomenclature code for description of complex finite elements and generation of new elements. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 39(2#5), 229–252 (2011)
Sanborn, G., Choi, J., Choi, J.H.: Curve-induced distortion of polynomial space curves, flat-mapped extension modeling, and their impact on ANCF thin-plate finite elements. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26, 191–211 (2011)
Dmitrochenko, O., Mikkola, A.: Digital nomenclature code for topology and kinematics of finite elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Proc., Part K, J. Multi-Body Dyn. 225(1#3), 34–51 (2011)
Sopanen, J.T., Mikkola, A.M.: Description of elastic forces in absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 34(1#3), 53–74 (2004)
Schwab, A., Meijaard, J.: Comparison of three-dimensional flexible beam elements for dynamic analysis: finite element method and absolute nodal coordinate formulation. In: Proceedings of the IDEC/CIE 2005, ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Paper Number DETC2005-85104, Long Beach (CA), USA, 24–28 September 2005
Gerstmayr, J., Matikainen, M.K., Mikkola, A.M.: A geometrically exact beam element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 20(4#4), 359–384 (2008)
Kreyszig, E.: Differential Geometry, p. 119. Dover, New York (1991)
Gere, J.M., Timoshenko, S.P.: Mechanics of Materials, 4th edn. PWS, Boston (1997), 912 pp
Nachbagauer, K., Pechstein, A.S., Irschik, H., Gerstmayr, J.: A new locking-free formulation for planar, shear deformable, linear and quadratic beam finite elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26, 245–263 (2011)
Dmitrochenko, O., Mikkola, A.: Two simple triangular plate elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 3(4#C), 041012-1-8 (2008)
Matikainen, M.K., von Hertzen, R., Mikkola, A., Gerstmayr, J.: Elimination of high frequencies in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Proc., Part K, J. Multi-Body Dyn. 224(1#7), 103–116 (2009)
Olshevskiy, A.A., Dmitrochenko, O.N., Lee, S., Kim, C.W.: A triangular plate element 2343 using second-order absolute-nodal-coordinate slopes: numerical computation of shape functions. Nonlinear Dyn. 74(3), 769–781 (2013)
Dmitrochenko, O., Mikkola, A.: Two simple triangular plate elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 3(4#C), 041012-1-8 (2008)
Mikkola, A.M., Shabana, A.A.: A non-incremental finite element procedure for the analysis of large deformation of plates and shells in mechanical system applications. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 9(3#4), 283–309 (2003)
Dmitrochenko, O.N., Pogorelov, D.Yu.: Generalization of plate finite elements for absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 10(1#2), 17–43 (2003)
Matikainen, M.K., Valkeapää, A.I., Mikkola, A.M., Schwab, A.L.: A study of moderately thick quadrilateral plate elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. (2013). doi:10.1007/s11044-013-9383-6
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through Korea NRF (2012R1A2A2A04047240 and 2012R1A1A2008870), Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development under the contract UD120037CD, and 2012 KU Brain Pool of Konkuk University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
1.1 A.1 Elements of equations of motion for element 4323
The shape functions for the triangular element 4323 are defined by Eq. (7) for the number of nodes n=3. The shape functions’ matrix S 4323 from Eq. (1) can be formulated as follows:
where I is the 3×3 identity matrix, and the shape functions \(s_{i,0}^{231}(x,y),\ i = 1, \ldots,3\) are described by Eq. (2).
The element mass matrix M 4323 and generalized vector of gravity forces \(\mathbf{Q}_{4323}^{\mathrm{g}}\), which are constants in the ANCF, are calculated by using Eq. (11) and can be written explicitly as
where D is the 6×6 diagonal matrix in the form D=diag[12,12,12,h 2,h 2,h 2], ρ is the material density, Δ is the element area, and h is the element thickness. For convenience, the mass matrix can be rewritten in a compact form as
where T is a symmetric Toeplitz matrix constructed by using diagonal values 2 and 1, and the symbol ⊗ represents the Kronecker block matrix product of matrices T and D.
1.2 A.2 Elements of equations of motion for element 4423
The shape functions for the rectangular element 4423 are also defined by Eq. (7) for the number of nodes n=4. The shape functions’ matrix S 4423 can be written explicitly as
where the bilinear shape functions \(s_{i,0}^{241}(x,y), i = 1, \ldots,4\) are determined by Eq. (3).
The mass matrix and the generalized vector of gravity force are
Again, the mass matrix can be reformulated using a symmetric Toeplitz matrix with diagonal values 4, 2, and 1, and the same matrix D=diag[12,12,12,h 2,h 2,h 2]:
1.3 A.3 Elements of equations of motion for element 6623
The shape functions for the triangular element 6623 are defined by Eq. (7), where n equals 3, and the matrix S 6623 of shape functions from Eq. (1) in explicit form can be formulated as follows:
where I is the 3×3 unit matrix, and \(s_{i,0}^{261}(x,y), \ i = 1, \ldots,6\) are the triangular shape functions.
The constant mass matrix and constant generalized gravity vector are calculated using Eq. (11):
where D is the 6×6 diagonal matrix of the form shown above, and O is the 6×6 zero matrix.
1.4 A.4 Elements of equations of motion for element 8823
The shape functions for the triangular element 8823 are defined by Eq. (7), where n equals 8, and the matrix S 8823 of shape functions from Eq. (1) in explicit form can be formulated as follows:
where I is the 3×3 unit matrix, and \(s_{i,0}^{281}(x,y), i = 1, \ldots,8\) are the shape functions. The constant mass matrix and constant generalized gravity vector are calculated using Eq. (11):
Appendix B: Cantilever beam subjected to large deflection
Tables 3 and 4 show the relative error in calculation of the vertical and horizontal deflection components, respectively, for the benchmark static problem described in Sect. 4.1. In these tables, p=Pl 2/EI is the force factor, the column ‘E.P.’ contains solution of the Euler’s Elastica problem, N is the number of elements along the beam length.
Appendix C: Cantilever beam subjected the action of a bending moment
Tables 5 and 6 show the values of deflection of the free-end of a cantilever beam calculated using elements 6623 and 4423. The results are compared to the analytical solution. The relative error is presented in Tables 7 and 8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olshevskiy, A., Dmitrochenko, O., Dai, M.D. et al. The simplest 3-, 6- and 8-noded fully-parameterized ANCF plate elements using only transverse slopes. Multibody Syst Dyn 34, 23–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-014-9411-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-014-9411-1