Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular Characterization and Virulence of Beauveria spp. from the Pine Processionary Moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae)

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) is one of the most harmful pests to pine species in Mediterranean countries including Turkey. Caterpillars of T. pityocampa are not only significantly harmful to forest trees but also responsible for various allergic reactions in humans and animals. In this study, in order to find a more effective and safe biological control agent against T. pityocampa, we investigated fungal pathogens of T. pityocampa in the Black Sea Region of Turkey and tested their pathogenicity on it. Five different fungi were isolated and identified based on their morphological and molecular characteristics including ITS and partial sequence of EF1-[alpha]. Based on these characteristics, four isolates were identified as Beauveria bassiana cf. Clade C (Rehner and Buckley in Mycologia 97:84–98, 2005) and one isolate was identified as Beauveria bassiana. Among these isolates, B. bassiana KTU-24, B. bassiana cf. Clade C KTU-66 and KTU-67 showed the highest virulence with 100% mortality within 10 days after application. B. bassiana isolate KTU-24 produced the highest mycosis value with %100. Consequently, B. bassiana KTU-24 seems to be good candidate for further investigation as a possible biological control agent against this pest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masutti L, Battisti A. Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) in Italy. Bionomics and perspectives of integrated control. J Appl Entomol. 1990;110:229–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shevelev AB, Battisti A, Volynskaya AM, Novikova S, Kostina LI, Zalunin IA. Susceptibility of the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) toward δ-endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis under laboratory conditions. Ann Appl Biol. 2001;138:255–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vega ML, Vega J, Vega JM, Moneo I, Sanchez E, Miranda A. Cutaneous reactions to pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) in pediatric population. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2003;14:482–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanat M, Alma MH, Sivrikaya F. Effect of defoliation by Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoidae) on annual diameter increment of Pinus brutia Ten. in Turkey. Ann For Sci. 2005;62:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vega JM, Moneo I, Armentia A, Lopez-Rico R, Curiel G, Bartolome B, Fernandez A. Anaphylaxis to a pine caterpillar. Allergy. 1997;52:1244–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Denneulin JC, Lamy M. Effects of a chitin inhibitor, dimilin 1- (4-chlorophenyl)-3-(2, 6-difluorobenzoyl) urea, on the oenocytes and moulting in the processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.) (Lepidoptera). Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1977;38:405–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgevits RP. Comparison of results in the control of Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. with Dimilin, Decis, Bactospeine and Thuricide HP. Anakoinoseis Idrumaton Dasikon Ereun. 1979;7:7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paparatti B, Fabozzi R. A new pathogen of the pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Den. et Schif.), Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae. Inf Fitopatol. 1988;38:45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Avtzis ND. The use of Bacillus thuringiensis against Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) in Greece. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. NE-247; 1998.

  10. Battisti A, Longo S, Tiberi R, Triggiany O. Results and perspectives in the use of Bacillus thuringiensis Berl. var. kurstaki and other pathogens against Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. et Schiff.) in Italy (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae). Anz Schadlingskd Pfl. 1998;71:72–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Triggiani O, Tarasco E. Efficacy and persistence of entomopathogenic nematodes in controlling larval populations of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2002;12:747–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Er MK, Tunaz H, Gokce A. Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi to Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Thaumatopoeidae) larvae in laboratory conditions. J Pest Sci. 2007;80:235–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ince IA, Demir I, Demirbag Z, Nalcacıoglu R. A cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus isolated from the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;17:632–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ince IA, Katı H, Yılmaz H, Demir I, Demirbag Z. Isolation and identification of bacteria from Thaumetopoea pityocampa Den. and Schiff. (Lep. Thaumetopoidae) and determination of their biocontrol potential. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:3005–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khetan S. Microbial pest control. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lacey LA, Goettel MS. Current developments in microbial control of insect pests and prospects for the early 21st century. Entomophaga. 1995;40:3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goettel MS, Eilenberg J, Glare T. Entomopathogenic fungi and their role in regulation of insect populations. In: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill SS, editors. Comprehensive molecular insect science. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2005. p. 361–405.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Alves SB, Pereira RM, Lopes RB, Tamai M. Use of entomopathogenic fungi in Latin America. In: Upadhyay RK, editor. Advances in microbial control of insect pests. New York: Kluwer; 2003. p. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feng MG, Poprawski TJ, Khachatourians GG. Production, formulation and application of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana for insect control: current status. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 1994;4:3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Glare TR. Molecular characterization in the entomopathogenic fungal genus Beauveria. Laimburg J. 2004;1:286–98.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glare TR, Reay SD, Nelson TL, Moore R. Beauveria caledonica is a naturally occurring pathogen of forest beetles. Mycol Res. 2008;112:352–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sevim A, Demir I, Höfte M, Humber RA, Demirbag Z. Isolation and characterization of entomopathogenic fungi from hazelnut-growing region of Turkey. Biocontrol. 2010;55:279–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sevim A, Demir I, Tanyeli E, Demirbag Z. Screening of entomopathogenic fungi against the European spruce bark beetle, Dendroctonus micans (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2010;20:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Glare TR, Inwood A. Morphological and genetic characterization of Beauveria spp. from New Zealand. Mycol Res. 1998;102:250–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rehner SA, Buckley E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97:84–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyling NV, Eilenberg J. Ecology of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in temperate agroecosystems: Potential for conservation biological control. Biol Control. 2007;43:145–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veen KH. Recherches sur la maladie due á Metarhizium anisopliae chez le criquet pèlerin. Dissertation, Wageningen University; 1968.

  28. Vargas-Osuna E, Ledesma MJ, Aldebis HK, Santiago-Alvarez C. Pathogens and parasitoids for the control of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (D. y Schiff) (Lep. Notodontidae). Bol Sanid Veg Plagas. 1994;20:511–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Humber R. Fungi: identification. In: Lacey LA, editor. Manual of techniques in insect pathology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997. p. 153–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp. 1990;41:95–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lacey LA, Frutos R, Kaya HK, Vail P. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: do they have a future? Biol Cont. 2001;21:230–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lacey LA. Microbial control of insects. In: Capinera J, editor. In encyclopedia of entomology. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2004. p. 1401–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Charnley AK. Microbial pathogens and insect pest control. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1991;12:149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sezen K, Demir I, Demirbag Z. Identification and pathogenicity of entomopathogenic bacteria from common cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). N Z J Crop Hort. 2007;35:79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Torres-Barragan A, Anaya AL, Alatorre R, Toriello C. Entomopathogenic fungi from ‘El Eden’ Ecological Reserve, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Mycopathologia. 2004;158:61–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Devi VPS, Prasad YG, Chowdary DA, Rao LM, Balakrishnan K. Identification of virulent isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi (F) Samson for the management of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera littura. Mycopathologia. 2003;156:365–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Takatsuka J. Characterization of Beauveria bassiana Isolates from Japan using intersimple sequence repeat-anchored polymerase chain reaction (ISSR-PCR) amplification. Appl Entomol Zool. 2007;42:563–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Richard Humber for his kind help with the morphological characterization of fungi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Ali Sevim, Ismail Demir & Zihni Demirbağ

  2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Rize University, Rize, Turkey

    Ali Sevim

Authors
  1. Ali Sevim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ismail Demir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zihni Demirbağ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zihni Demirbağ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sevim, A., Demir, I. & Demirbağ, Z. Molecular Characterization and Virulence of Beauveria spp. from the Pine Processionary Moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Mycopathologia 170, 269–277 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-010-9321-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-010-9321-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation