Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Novel Hybrid Technique of Integrating Gradient-Boosted Machine and Clustering Algorithms for Lithology Classification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The significant body of research on lithology identification in recent years has laid emphasis on the improvement of classification performance using hybrid machine learning methods. To the best of our knowledge, a hybrid lithology classification model that integrates clustering results of well log data has not been developed. This study, therefore, exploits the advantage of incorporating results from clustering well log data into 2 and 3 groups using K-means and Gaussian mixture models (GMM) to construct a more accurate gradient-boosted machine (GBM) lithology model. The findings of the study showed that improved performance in terms of classification accuracy rate was achieved by the K-means-based GBM classifiers. In addition, GMM-based GBM established an enhanced performance when the developed classifiers were tested on the entire dataset. A rigorous examination of the confusion matrices generated by the classifiers further revealed that the increase in the performance from the clustering-based hybrid GBM models was attributed to the improvement in recognizing mudstone and siltstone, which represents the main lithofacies that are found in the South Yellow Sea’s southern Basin. The findings from the present paper demonstrate that a clustering-based hybrid GBM model can handle new independent lithofacies classification better than GBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, C. C., & Reddy, C. K. (2013). Data clustering: Algorithms and applications (pp. 2–21). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Anazi, A., & Gates, I. D. (2010a). A support vector machine algorithm to classify lithofacies and model permeability in heterogeneous reservoirs. Engineering Geology,114, 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Anazi, A., & Gates, I. D. (2010b). On the capability of support vector machines to classify lithology from well logs. Natural Resources Research,19, 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aler, R., Galván, I. M., Ruiz-Arias, J. A., & Gueymard, C. A. (2017). Improving the separation of direct and diffuse solar radiation components using machine learning by gradient boosting. Solar Energy,150, 558–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mohair, H. K., Saleh, J. M., & Suandi, S. A. (2015). Hybrid human skin detection using neural network and K-means clustering technique. Applied Soft Computing,33, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirgaliev, E., Isabaev, Z., Iskakov, S., Kuchin, Y., Muhamedyev, R., Muhamedyeva, E., et al. (2014). Recognition of rocks at uranium deposits by using a few methods of machine learning. Soft Computing in Machine Learning Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing,273, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante-Okyere, S., Shen, C., Ziggah, Y. Y., Rulegeya, M. M., & Zhu, X. (2018). Investigating the predictive performance of Gaussian process regression in evaluating reservoir porosity and permeability. Energies,11, 3261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartetzko, A., Delius, H., & Pechnig, R. (2005). Effect of compositional and structural variations on log responses of igneous and metamorphic rocks. In P. K. Harvey, T. S. Brewer, P. A. Pezard, & V. A. Petrov (Eds.), Petrophysical properties of crystalline rocks (pp. 255–278). London: Geological Society Special Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramer, M. (2013). Data for data mining. In Principles of data mining. Undergraduate topics in computer science. London: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4884-5_2. ISBN: 978-1-4471-4884-5.

  • Chang, H. C., Kopaska-Merkel, D. C., Chen, H. C., & Durrans, S. R. (2000). Lithofacies identification using multiple adaptive resonance theory neural networks and group decision expert system. Computers & Geosciences,26, 591–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Chang, K., & Wu, G. (2018). Application of eXtreme gradient boosting trees in the construction of credit risk assessment models for financial institutions. Applied Soft Computing Journal,73, 914–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,16, 321–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina-Januchs, M. G., Quintanilla-Dominguez, J., Vega-Corona, A., & Andina, D. (2015). Development of a model for forecasting of PM10 concentrations in Salamanca, Mexico. Atmospheric Pollution Research,6, 626–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracknell, M. J., & Reading, A. M. (2014). Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information. Computers & Geosciences,63(2014), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, N. E. (1969). Estimating the components of a mixture of normal distributions. Biometrika,56(3), 463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B,39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, C., Pan, H., Fang, S., Konaté, A. A., & Qin, R. (2017). Support vector machine as an alternative method for lithology classification of crystalline rocks. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering,14, 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsan, M., Gu, H., Akhtar, M. M., Abbasi, S. S., & Ullah, Z. (2018). Identification of hydrocarbon potential of talhar shale: Member of lower goru formation by using well logs derived parameters, southern lower Indus basin, Pakistan. Journal of Earth Science,29, 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elangasinghe, M. A., Singhal, N., Dirks, K. N., Salmond, J. A., & Samarasinghe, S. (2014). Complex time series analysis of PM 10 and PM 2.5 for a coastal site using artificial neural network modelling and k-means clustering. Atmospheric Environment,94, 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschi, F., Cobo, M., & Figueredo, M. (2018). Discovering relationships and forecasting PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Bogotá, Colombia, using artificial neural networks, principal component analysis, and k-means clustering. Atmospheric Pollution Research,9(5), 912–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics,29, 1189–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. (2002). Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis,38, 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, A., Calvo-Zaragoza, J., Valero-Mas, J., & Rico-Juan, J. R. (2018). Clustering-based k-nearest neighbor classification for large-scale data with neural codes representation. Pattern Recognition,74, 531–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, D., Cheng, R., Shen, Y., Wang, L., & Hu, X. (2018). Weathered and volcanic provenance-sedimentary system and its influence on reservoir quality in the east of the eastern depression, the north Yellow Sea Basin. Journal of Earth Science,29, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. E., Rothrock, M. J., & Mishra, A. (2019). Comparison between random forest and gradient boosting machine methods for predicting Listeria spp. prevalence in the environment of pastured poultry farms. Food Research International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., Robertson, J., & Uvarova, Y. (2015). Multiscale hierarchical domaining and compression of drill hole data. Computers & Geosciences,79, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., & Uvarova, Y. (2018). Identifying the nature of lithogeochemical boundaries in drill holes. Journal of Geochemical Exploration,184 Part A, 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Surveys,31(3), 264–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., Daigle, H., Tian, X., Pyrcz, M. J., Griffith, C., & Zhang, B. (2019). A comparison of clustering algorithms applied to fluid characterization using NMR T1-T2 maps of shale. Computers & Geosciences,126, 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassenaar JDC (1991) An application of principal components analysis to borehole geophysical data. In Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on borehole geophysics for minerals, geotechnical and groundwater applications, Toronto, ON, Canada (pp. 211–218).

  • Konaté, A. A., Ma, H., Pan, H., Qin, Z., Ahmed, H. A., & Dembele, N. J. (2017). Lithology and mineralogy recognition from geochemical logging tool data using multivariate statistical analysis. Applied Radiation and Isotopes,128, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konaté, A. A., Pan, H., Ma, H., Cao, X., Ziggah, Y. Y., Oloo, M., et al. (2015). Application of dimensionality reduction technique to improve geo-physical log data classification performance in crystalline rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,133, 633–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Ma, Z., Robinson, D., & Ma, J. (2018). Identification of typical building daily electricity usage profiles using Gaussian mixture model-based clustering and hierarchical clustering. Applied Energy,231, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiti, S., & Tiwari, R. K. (2010). Neural network modeling and an uncertainty analysis in Bayesian framework: A case study from the KTB borehole site. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB000864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G. J., Peel, D., Basford, K. E., & Adams, P. (1999). The EMMIX software for the fitting of mixtures of normal and t-components. Journal of Statistical Software,4(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998). A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. Learning in graphical models (pp. 355–368). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Othman, A. A., & Gloaguen, R. (2017). Integration of spectral, spatial and morphometric data into lithological mapping: A comparison of different machine learning algorithms in the Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,146, 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, Y., Zhang, X., Xiao, G., Wen, Z., Guo, X., Hou, F., et al. (2016). Structural and geological characteristics of the south yellow sea basin in lower Yangtze block. Geological Review,62, 604–616. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechnig R, Bartetzko A, Delius H (2001) Effects of compositional and structural variations on log responses in igneous and metamorphic rocks. In Proceedings of the AGU fall meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, Abstract V32C-0988.

  • Pechnig, R., Delius, H., & Bartetzko, A. (2005). Effect of compositional variations on log responses of igneous and metamorphic rocks, Chapter 2: Acid and intermediate rocks. In P. K. Harvey, T. S. Brewer, P. A. Pezard, & V. A. Petrov (Eds.), Petrophysical properties of crystalline rocks (pp. 279–300). London: Geological Society Special Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Shi, X., Rodrigue, A. K., Feng, J., Xia, Y., Elhoseny, M., et al. (2019). Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree. Applied Soft Computing Journal,74, 634–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggaf, M. M., & Nebrija, E. L. (2008). Estimation of lithologies and depositional facies from wire-line logs. AAPG Bulletin,4, 1633–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggaf, M. M., & Nebrija, L. (2003). A fuzzy logic approach for the estimation of facies from wire-line logs. AAPG Bulletin,87, 1223–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salim, A. M. A., Pan, H. P., Luo, M., & Zhou, F. (2008). Integrated log interpretation in the Chinese continental scientific drilling main hole (Eastern China): Lithology and mineralization. Journal of Applied Sciences,8, 3593–3602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saporetti, C. M., Duarte, G. R., Fonseca, T. L., Goliatt da Fonseca, L., & Pereira, E. (2018). Extreme learning machine combined with a differential evolution algorithm for lithology identification. Revista de Informática Teórica e Aplicada RITA,25, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebtosheikh, M. A., Motafakkerfard, R., Riahi, M. A., & Moradi, S. (2015). Separating well log data to train support vector machines for lithology prediction in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Iranian Journal of Oil & Gas Science and Technology,4, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C., Asante-Okyere, S., Ziggah, Y. Y., Wang, L., & Zhu, X. (2019). Group method of data handling (GMDH) lithology identification based on wavelet analysis and dimensionality reduction as well log data pre-processing techniques. Energies,12, 1509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2005). Introduction to data mining. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzani, S., Granderson, J., & Fernandes, S. (2018). Gradient boosting machine for modeling the energy consumption of commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings,158, 1533–1543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Ni, X., & Cai, F. (2008). Petroleum geological framework and hydrocarbon potential in the Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology,26, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Zhu, C., Zhou, W., Li, Z., & Tu, M. (2018). Evaluation of machine learning methods for formation lithology identification: A comparison of tuning processes and model performances. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,139, 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S., Yi, S., Batten, D. J., Yun, H., & Park, S. J. (2013). Cretaceous and Cenozoic non-marine deposits of the Northern South Yellow Sea Basin, offshore western Korea: palynostratigraphy and palaeoenvironments. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,191, 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Major National Science and Technology Programs in the “Thirteenth Five-Year” Plan period (Nos. 2016ZX05024-002-005, 2017ZX05032-002-004), the Outstanding Youth Funding of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2016CFA055), the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. B14031), and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan, No. CUGCJ1820).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanbo Shen.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8.

Figure 5
figure 5

Well log clusters of 2 groups using K-means

Figure 6
figure 6

Well log clusters of 3 groups using K-means

Figure 7
figure 7

Well log clusters of 2 groups using GMM

Figure 8
figure 8

Well log clusters of 3 groups using GMM

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asante-Okyere, S., Shen, C., Ziggah, Y.Y. et al. A Novel Hybrid Technique of Integrating Gradient-Boosted Machine and Clustering Algorithms for Lithology Classification. Nat Resour Res 29, 2257–2273 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09576-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09576-4

Keywords

Navigation