Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Cooperative Coalitional Game in Duopolistic Supply-Chain Competition

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperative coalitional games study the selection of chain partners, the formation of supply chains and outcome allocations. The chain value of a coalition depends on the outcome of inter-chain competition. Subsequently, chain partners may accept their payoffs or decide to defect to another coalition that has made a higher tender offer. The formation and defection continues until a stable Cournot-Nash equilibrium is reached. This is the state where no player may unilaterally defect to another coalition and earn a higher profit. We formulate the cooperative coalitional game as a variational inequality problem and propose an iterative diagonalization algorithm to determine the steady state for the game. The computational results illustrated that (1) supply-chain competition may not necessarily preserve the same level of social welfare; (2) internalization of resources and costs may distort the general competition economy; and (3) wielding the power in a supply chain does not necessarily translate into higher profits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein F, Federgruen A (2003) Pricing and replenishment strategies in a distribution system with competing retailers. Oper Res 51(3):409–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Manage Sci 51(1):30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon GP, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the e-business era. Springer Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan S, Proth JM (2005) Analysis of a supply chain partnership with revenue sharing. Int J Prod Econ 97(1):44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher ML (1992) Logistics and supply chain management. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos S (1983) An iterative scheme for variational inequalities. Math Program 26:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak Y, Gupta D (1991) On apportioning costs to customers in centralized continuous review inventory systems. J Oper Manage 10(4):546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman BC, Dror M (1996) Cost allocation in continuous-review inventory models. Nav Res Logist 43(4):549–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinderlehrer D, Stampacchia G (1980) An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi H, Ray D (2003) Coalition formation as a dynamic process. J Econ Theory 110(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1990) Improving channel coordination through franchising. Mark Sci 9(4):299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng M, Parlar M (2009) Allocation of cost savings in a three-level supply chain with demand information sharing: a cooperative-game approach. Oper Res 57(1):200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meca A, Timmer J, Garcia-Jurado I, Borm PEM (2004) Inventory games. Eur J Oper Res 156(1):127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PR, Wood DF (2004) Contemporary logistics, 8th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan M, Sosic G (2008) Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: review and extensions. Eur J Oper Res 187(3):719–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack B (1985) Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities. Mark Sci 4(2):166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2004) Implications of breach remedy and renegotiation for design of supply contracts. Stanford GSB research paper 1888.

  • Richey RG, Tokman M, Skinner LR (2008) Exploring collaborative technology utilization in retailer-supplier performance. J Bus Res 61(8):842–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slikker M, van den Nouweland A (2001) Social and economic networks in cooperative game theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor T (2002) Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Manage Sci 48(8):992–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay A (1999) The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Manage Sci 45(10):1339–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue L (1998) Coalitional stability under perfect foresight. Econ Theory 11(3):603–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was partially supported by grants NSC98-2410-H-006-011-MY2 of the National Science Council, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Chang Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, CC., Hsieh, CC. A Cooperative Coalitional Game in Duopolistic Supply-Chain Competition. Netw Spat Econ 12, 129–146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-011-9154-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-011-9154-y

Keywords

Navigation