Skip to main content
Log in

Dual Toll Pricing for Hazardous Materials Transport with Linear Delay

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a dual toll pricing method to mitigate risk of hazardous materials (hazmat) transportation. We aim to simultaneously control both regular and hazmat vehicles to reduce the risk. In our model, we incorporate a new risk measure to consider duration-population-frequency of hazmat exposure. We first formulate the model as a Mathematical Program with Equilibrium Constraints (MPEC). Then we decompose the MPEC formulation into first-stage and second-stage problems. Separate methods are developed to solve each stage. A numerical example is provided and possible extensions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alp E (1995) Risk-based transportation planning practice: overall methodology and a case example. Inf Syst Oper Res 33(1):4–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R, Small K (1994) The economics of traffic congestion. Am Sci 20(2):123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Hearn DW, Lawphongpanich S (2006) Relaxed toll sets for congestion pricing problems. In: Lawphongpanich S, Hearn DW, Smith MJ (eds) Mathematical and computational models for congestion charging. Springer

  • Bard JF (2006). Practical bilevel optimization: algorithms and applications (nonconvex optimization and its applications). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc, Secaucus, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergendorff P, Hearn D, Ramana M (1997) Congestion toll pricing of traffic networks. In: Pardalos PM, Hearn DW, Hager WW (eds) Network optimization, Springer, pp 51–71

  • Cekyay B, Verter V (2010) Transportation of hazardous materials in urban areas. Working paper, McGill University

  • Dial RB (1999) Minimal-revenue congestion pricing part i: a fast algorithm for the single-origin case. Transp Res, Part B: Methodol 33(3):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dial RB (2000) Minimal-revenue congestion pricing part ii: an efficient algorithm for the general case. Transp Res, Part B: Methodol 34(8):645–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Ingolfsson A (2000) Catastrophe avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning. Transp Sci 34(2):165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Alp O (2007) Designing a road network for hazardous materials shipments. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1389–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Gzara F (2008) Solving the hazmat transport network design problem. Comput Oper Res 35(7):2234–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JE, Soland RM (1969) An algorithm for separable nonconvex programming problems. Manage Sci 15(9):550–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk CS, Boyce DE (1983) Alternative variational inequality formulations of the network equilibrium-travel choice problem. Transport Sci 17(4):454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R (1993) Resolving degeneracy in quadratic programming. Ann Oper Res 46(2):307–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian M, Hearn D (1995) Network equilibrium models and algorithms. Handb Oper Res Manag Sci 8:485–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallamore R, Barkan C, Bowditch Jr B, Brinson J, Bronzini M, Bugg O, Burke C, Chapman E, Egan T, Garber NJ, Kelley P, Moreland M, Morrissette M, Veerman G, Menzies Jr TR (2005) Cooperative research for hazardous materials transportation: defining the need, converging on solutions. Special report 283, Transportation Research Board

  • Hearn D, Ramana M (1998) Solving congestion toll pricing models. In: Marcotte P, Nguyen S (eds) Equilibrium and advanced transportation modeling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 109–124

  • Hearn DW, Yildirim MB (2002) A toll pricing framework for traffic assignment problems with elastic demand. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 135–145

  • Johansson-Stenman O, Sterner T (1998) What is the scope for environmental road pricing? Gothenburg U: Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass., pp 150–170

  • Kara B, Verter V (2004) Designing a road network for hazardous materials transportation. Transport Sci 38(2):188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z-Q, Pang J-S, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte P, Mercier A, Savard G, Verter V (2009) Toll policies for mitigating hazardous materials transport risk. Transport Sci 43(2):228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May AD, Milne DS (2000) Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance. Transp Res, Part A Policy Pract 34(6):407–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More J, Wright S (1993) Optimization software guide. Society for Industrial Mathematics

  • Movassaghi K, Daly J, Dinh-Zarr T, Herbel S, Joavanis P, Porter L, Robertson H, Songer T, Sweatman P, Tay R, Welch T, Menzies Jr T (2007) Building the road safety profession in the public sector. Special report 289, Transportation Research Board

  • Outrata J, Kocvara M, Zowe J, (1998) Nonsmooth approach to optimization problems with equilibrium constraints. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C, Cohon J, Shobrys D (1991) Simultaneous siting and routing in the disposal of hazardous wastes. Transp Sci 25(2):138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccomanno F, Chan A (1985) Economic evaluation of routing strategies for hazardous road shipments. Transp Res Rec 1020:12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaible S (1981) Quasiconvex, pseudoconvex, and strictly pseudoconvex quadratic functions. J Optim Theory Appl 35(3):303–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar R, Batta R, Karwan M (1993) Establishing credible risk criteria for transporting extremely dangerous hazardous materials. In: Saccomanno F, Cassidy K (eds) Transportation of dangerous goods: assessing the risks. Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, Canada, pp 335–342

  • Verhoef E (2002) Second-best congestion pricing in general static transportation networks with elastic demands. Reg Sci Urban Econ 32(3):281–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verter V, Kara BY (2008) A path-based approach for hazmat transport network design. Manage Sci 54(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Lam WHK (1996) Optimal road tolls under conditions of queueing and congestion. Transp Res, Part A Policy Pract 30(5):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim MB, Hearn DW (2005) A first best toll pricing framework for variable demand traffic assignment problems. Transp Res, Part B: Methodol 39(8):659–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y (2002) Multiobjective bilevel optimization for transportation planning and management problems. J Adv Transp 36(1):93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Lawphongpanich S (2006) Internalizing emission externality on road networks. Transp Res, Part D Transp Environ 11(4):292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changhyun Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Kang, Y., Kwon, C. et al. Dual Toll Pricing for Hazardous Materials Transport with Linear Delay. Netw Spat Econ 12, 147–165 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-011-9156-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-011-9156-9

Keywords

Navigation