Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Insurance Rates for Turkey

  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A probabilistic model is presented to obtain a realistic estimate of earthquake insurance rates for reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey. The model integrates information on seismic hazard and information on expected earthquake damage on engineering facilities in a systematic way, yielding to estimates of earthquake insurance premiums. In order to demonstrate the application of the proposed probabilistic method, earthquake insurance rates are computed for reinforced concrete buildings constructed in five cities located in different seismic zones of Turkey. The resulting rates are compared with the rates currently charged by the insurance companies. The earthquake insurance rates are observed to be sensitive to the assumptions on seismic hazard and damage probability matrices and to increase significantly with increasing violation of the code requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. D. Akkaya M. S. Yucemen (2002) ArticleTitleStochastic modeling of earthquake occurrences and estimation of seismic hazard: A random field approach Probab. Eng. Mech. 17 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Amendola Y. Ermoliev T. Y. Ermolieva V. Gitis G. Koff J. Linnerooth-Bayer (2000) ArticleTitleA systems approach to modeling catastrophic risk and insurability Nat. Hazards 21 381–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council: 1985, Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Report ATC-13, Redwood City, California.

  • Askan, A. and Yucemen, M. S.: 2003, Stochastic methods for the estimation of potential seismic damage. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering,Berkeley, California, Vol. I, pp. 497–502.

  • R. Blong (2003a) ArticleTitleA review of damage intensity scales Nat. Hazards 29 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Blong (2003b) ArticleTitleA new damage index Nat. Hazards 30 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bommer R. Spence M. Erdik S. Tabuchi N. Aydinoglu E. Booth D. del Re O. Peterken (2002) ArticleTitleDevelopment of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance J. Seismol. 6 431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Brillinger (1993) ArticleTitleEarthquake Risk and Insurance Environmentrics 4 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCode (1975) Specifications for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas Earthquake Research Institute, Turkish Government Ministry of Reconstruction and Resettlement Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Cornell (1968) ArticleTitleEngineering seismic risk analysis Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 IssueID5 1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Cornell S. R. Winterstein (1998) ArticleTitleTemporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78 1522–1537

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Elnashai (2000) ArticleTitleAnalysis of the damage potential of Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake of 17 August 1999 Eng. Struct. 22 IssueID7 746–754

    Google Scholar 

  • S. G. Ferraes (2003) ArticleTitleThe conditional probability of earthquake occurrence and the next large earthquake in Tokyo, Japan J. Seismol. 7 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gencoglu, S., Ozmen, B., and Guler, H.: 1996, Settlement Locations and Earthquake, Turkish Earthquake Foundation, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • Gulkan, P., Yucemen, M. S., Basoz, N., Kocyigit, A., and Doyuran, V.: 1993, Seismic Zoning Map for Turkey Based on the Most Recent Data, METU/EERC; Report No. 93–01, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • Gurpinar, A. and Yucemen, M. S.: 1980, An obligatory earthquake insurance model for Turkey, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering for Protection from Natural Disasters, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 895–906

  • Gurpinar, A., Abali, M., Yucemen, M. S., and Yesilcay, Y.: 1978, Feasibility of Obligatory Earthquake Insurance in Turkey, METU/ EERI Report No.78–05, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • B. Gutenberg C. Richter (1956) ArticleTitleEarthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 46 105–143

    Google Scholar 

  • W. B. Joyner D. M. Boore (1981) ArticleTitlePeak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley California earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 IssueID6 2011–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamei, K.: 1976, Japanese report on outline of earthquake insurance in Japan, In: UNESCO Conference on Assessment and Mitigation of Earthquake Risk, Paris.

  • H. Kunreuther (1996) ArticleTitleMitigating disaster losses through insurance J. Risk Uncertainty 12 171–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, J. E.: 1980, Catastrophes and catastrophe insurances, J. Inst. Actuaries Student Soc. 24, 1980, 91–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Lomnitz (1974) Global Tectonics and Earthquake Risk Elsevier Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. McGuire (2004) Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis EERI MNO-10, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozgur, C. and Yucemen, M. S.: 1997, Assessment of Seismic Hazard for Cyprus, Chamber of Civil Engineers, Report No.: UCCTEA/CCE-97–01, Nicosia.

  • Ozmen, B. and Bagcı, G.: 2000, 12 November 1999 Düzce Earthquake Report, Ministry of Public Works and Resettlement, General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Earthquake Research Department, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • Scawthorn, C., Kunreuther, H., and Roth Jr, R.: 2003, Insurance and financial risk transfer, In: W.-F Chen. and C. Scawthorn (eds.), Earthquake Engineering Handbook, CRC Press, Chapter 32.

  • A. Smolka G. Berz (1989) ArticleTitleThe Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985 – an analysis of the insured loss and implications for risk assessment Earthquake Spectra 5 223–248

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Smolka G. Berz (1989) ArticleTitleThe Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985 -- an analysis of the insured loss and implications for risk assessment Earthquake Spectra 5 223–248

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Steven (1992) ArticleTitleThe earthquake and war damage commission – a look forward (and a look back) Bull. N. Z. Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 25 52–55

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Straub (1973) ArticleTitleEarthquakes and statistics from the insurance point of view, Bull Inter. Statist. Inst. 45 IssueID3 462–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucuoglu, H. and Tokyay, M.: 1992, Engineering Report of 13 March 1992 Erzincan Earthquake, Turkish Society of Civil Engineers, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • M. D. Trifunac A. G. Brady (1975) ArticleTitleOn the correlation of seismic intensity scale with peaks of recorded ground motions Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 45 139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Vere Jones (1973) ArticleTitleThe statistical estimation of earthquake risk N. Z. Stat. 8 7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Wald V. Quitoriano T. H. Heaton H. Kanamori (1999) ArticleTitleRelationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and modified Mercalli intensity in California Earthquake Spectra 15 IssueID3 557–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. R.: 2000, Earthquake engineering and insurance: past, present and future, Aon Re Australia (available on the Internet at: http://www.aon.com.au/reinsurance/knowledge/quake_engineering.asp).

  • Wasti, S. T. and Sucuoglu, H.: 1999, Rehabilitation of Moderately Damaged Reinforced Concrete Buildings after the 1 October 1995 Dinar Earthquake, METU/EERC, Report No. 99–01, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • R. V. Whitman (1973) Damage Probability Matrices for Prototype Buildings Dept. of Civil Engineering MIT, R73–57, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Yucemen (1992) ArticleTitleSeismic hazard maps for Jordan and vicinity Nat. Hazards 6 IssueID3 201–226

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Yucemen (1993) ArticleTitleA random field model for the estimation of seismic hazard Struct. Safety 12 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Yucemen, M. S.: 2002, Prediction of potential seismic damage to reinforced concrete buildings based on damage probability matrices, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Concrete Technology for Developing Countries, Amman, Vol. 3, pp. 951–960.

  • M. S. Yucemen A. Akkaya (Dener) (1996) A comparative study of stochastic models for seismic hazard estimation M. I. El-Sabh S. Venkatesh H. Denis T. S. Murty (Eds) Land-Based and Marine Hazards NumberInSeries7 Kluwer Academic Publishers The Netherlands 5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Yucemen A. Askan (2003) Estimation of earthquake damage probabilities for reinforced concrete buildings S. T. Wasti G. Ozcebe (Eds) Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, NATO Science Series IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences. NumberInSeries29 Kluwer Academic Publishers The Netherlands 149–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Yucemen, M. S. and Bulak, S.: 1997, Assessment of earthquake insurance premiums based on statistical methods, In: Proceedings of the Fourth National Earthquake Engineering Conference, Ankara, pp. 699–707 (in Turkish).

  • M. S. Yucemen S. Bulak (2000) ArticleTitleEstimation of earthquake damage on structures: damage probability matrices Bull. Chamb. Civil Eng. 3 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Yucemen P. Gulkan (1994) ArticleTitleSeismic hazard analysis with randomly located sources Nat. Hazards 9 215–233

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. YUCEMEN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

YUCEMEN, M.S. Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Insurance Rates for Turkey. Nat Hazards 35, 291–313 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-004-6485-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-004-6485-8

Keywords

Navigation