Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disaster vulnerability and evacuation readiness: coastal mobile home residents in Florida

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines disaster preparedness in a highly vulnerable population, mobile home park residents in hurricane-prone areas. The vulnerabilities of this population mandate evacuation as the only viable disaster response strategy, but this does not always happen. In order to explore evacuation decision making, interviews were conducted with 75 mobile home park residents in Ruskin, Florida. Descriptive results build on a conceptualization of physical, structural, socio-economic, and “residual” disaster vulnerability; the latter is defined as a combination of experiences, perceptions, and preparations that inhibit the willingness and abilities of respondents to protect themselves. While residents generally prepared for disasters, evacuation plans were troubling. Barriers to evacuation based on measured vulnerabilities remained unclear, and analysis of responses failed to explain respondents’ varying evacuation preparations. Future research needs to address differential evacuation behaviors among mobile home park residents. We further conclude that disaster preparation and education need to address the special risks of this and other vulnerable populations better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In accordance with the United States Census Bureau and to reflect residents’ preferences, we use the term “mobile home” to refer to the variety of housing that is not built on site, ranging from “manufactured homes” (the preferred term by the manufactured housing industry) to “trailers.”

  2. The research site markers on the map are placed at the center of the parks. Many parks fall into two or even three flood zones which creates additional disparate vulnerability within parks.

  3. According to the 2007/2008 APPA National Pet Owners Survey, 63% of U.S. households own a pet, which equates to 71.1 million homes. Thirty-four percent of US households have at least one cat, while 39% have at least one dog (APPA 2008).

  4. Schmidlin et al. (2009) discuss the “dubious” quality of evacuation destinations of mobile home residents following a tornado warning.

References

  • Allman JW (2006, February 20) Building against the odds: developing disaster. The Tampa tribune. www2.tbo.com/content/2007/aug/11/building-against-odds/. Accessed 23 Jan 2009

  • Always J, Belgrave LL, Smith KJ (1998) Back to normal: gender and disaster. Symb Interact 21:175–195. doi:10.1525/si.1998.21.2.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Community Survey (2007) US census. Factfinder.census.gov. Accessed 23 Jan 2009

  • American Pet Products Association (APPA) (2008) Industry statistics and trends: pet ownership. http://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp. Accessed 15 Dec 2008

  • Arlikatty S, Lindell MK, Prater CS et al (2006) Risk area accuracy and hurricane evacuation expectations of coastal residents. Environ Behav 38:226–247. doi:10.1177/0013916505277603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9:287–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Blendon RJ, Buhr T, Benson JM et al. (2008) Hurricane readiness in high risk areas. Harvard School of Public Health, Project on the Public and Biological Security. www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/files/hurricane_2008_total_release_topline.doc. Accessed 23 Jan 2009

  • Bolin R, Stanford L (1991) Shelter, housing and recovery: a comparison of US disasters. Disasters 15:24–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedliz A et al (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40:72–95. doi:10.1177/0013916506298800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty J, Tobin GA, Montz BE (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geo-physical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6:23–33. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:1(23)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Meaker JW, Zhan FB (2006) Agent-based modeling and analysis of hurricane evacuation procedures for the Florida Keys. Nat Hazards 38:321–338. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-0263-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2301–2306. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710375105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell J, Scott M (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:713–737. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.8402002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash N, Gladwin H (2007) Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses: individual and household. Nat Hazards Rev 8:69–77. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra W, Smit JH, Comijs HC (2001) Using social desirability scales in research among the elderly. Qual Quant 35:107–115. doi:10.1023/A:1004816210439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow K, Cutter SL (1998) Crying wolf: repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders. Coast Manag 26:237–252. doi:10.1080/08920759809362356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot JR, Pais J (2006) Race, class, and hurricane Katrina: social differences in human responses to disaster. Soc Sci Res 35:295–321. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enarson E, Scanlon J (1999) Gender patterns in flood evacuation: a case study in Canada’s Red River Valley. Appl Behav Sci Rev 7:103–124. doi:10.1016/S1068-8595(00)80013-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruntfest E, Carsell K (2000) The warning process: toward an understanding of false alarms. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

  • Gruntfest E, Handmer J (2001) Where do we go from here: policy and research recommendations. In: Gruntfest E, Handmer J (eds) Coping with flash flood. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney TJ, Elliot JR, Fussell E (2007) Families and hurricane response: evacuation, separation, and the emotional toll of hurricane Katrina. In: Brunsma DB, Overfelt D, Picou JS (eds) The sociology of Katrina: perspectives on a modern catastrophe. Rowman & Littlefield, New York, pp 71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman C, Squires GD (eds) (2006) There is no such thing as a natural disaster: race, class and Hurricane Katrina. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz Center (2000) The hidden costs of coastal hazards: Implications for risk assessment and mitigation. Island Press, The H. John Heinz III Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (1983) The Idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In: Hewitt K (ed) Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology. Allen and Unwin, Boston, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman SM, Oliver-Smith A (eds) (2002) Catastrophe & culture: the anthropology of disaster. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum A (2004) Generic sources of disaster communities: social network approach. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 24:94–129. doi:10.1108/01443330410791073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusenbach M, Taylor C (2009) Hurricane evacuation among mobile home residents in Florida: the role of social networks. In: Ersing RL, Kost KA (eds) Surviving disasters: the role of social networks. Lyceum, Chicago (forthcoming)

  • Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007) A hurricane evacuation management decision support system (EMDSS). Nat Hazards 40:627–634. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9013-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montz BE, Tobin GA (2005) Socio-economic patterns of vulnerability: senior living developments and hurricane Charley. Pap Appl Geogr Conf 28:216–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Montz BE, Blackman V, Halupke L (2005) Hurricane Charley and changing vulnerability: an analysis of spatial and temporal changes. Fla Geogr 36:6–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow BH (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters 23:1–18. doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof AJ (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psychol 15:263–280. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith A, Hoffman SM (2002) Why anthropologists should study disasters. In: Hoffman SM, Oliver-Smith A (eds) Catastrophe & culture: the anthropology of disaster. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2003) Disaster preparedness: a social cognitive perspective. Disaster Prev Manag 12(3):210–216. doi:10.1108/09653560310480686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Johnston D (2001) Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience, preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag 10(4):270–277. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold T (2008) What you should expect to happen to your structure. Presentation at 30th National Hurricane Conference, Orlando, FL, April

  • Riad J, Norris FH (1998) Hurricane threat and evacuation intentions: an analysis of risk perception, preparedness, social Influence, and resources. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlin TW, Hammer OB, Ono Y et al (2009) Tornado shelter-seeking behavior and tornado shelter options among mobile home residents in the United States. Nat Hazards 48(2):191–201. doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9257-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel JM, Shoaf KI, Afifi AA et al (2003) Surviving two disasters: does reaction to the first predict response to the second? Environ Behav 35:637–654. doi:10.1177/0013916503254754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons KM, Sutter D (2008) Manufactures home building regulations and the February 2, 2007 Florida tornadoes. Nat Hazards 46:415–425. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9192-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SK, House M (2006) Snowbirds, sunbirds, and stayers: seasonal migration of elderly adults in Florida. J Gerontol 61B:S232–S239

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JH (2000) Warning systems review hazard warning systems: review of 20 years of progress. Nat Hazards Rev 1:119–125. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E et al (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30:39–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Montz BE (1997) Natural hazards: explanation and integration. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Raulerson AE (2007) Hurricane warning, forecasting and response: public perceptions in Lake Wales, Florida. Fla Geogr 38:67–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Bell HM, Montz BE et al (2005) Hurricane Charley: the aftermath: impacts and responses. University of South Florida, Department of Geography, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Bell HM, Whiteford LM et al (2006) Vulnerability of displaced persons: relocation park residents in the wake of hurricane Charley. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 24:77–109

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census (2000) Census data. factfinder.census.gov. Accessed 23 Jan 2009

  • United States Landfalling Hurricane Project (2008) Electronic document. http://www.e-transit.org/hurricane/welcome.html

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T et al (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu SY, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey. Clim Res 22:255–270. doi:10.3354/cr022255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Carylanna Taylor, Daniel Carpenter, Amanda F. Houlis, Arteisha M. Hughes, Alexis M. McLaughlin, Ryan K. Morris, and Wanda Sloan for their research assistance. Data collection was, in part, supported by National Science Foundation grant SES-0649060 and the 2007 “Graduate Field Studies in Sustainable Communities Research” program at the University of South Florida. Also, thanks to two anonymous reviewers who provided valuable insights and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarethe Kusenbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kusenbach, M., Simms, J.L. & Tobin, G.A. Disaster vulnerability and evacuation readiness: coastal mobile home residents in Florida. Nat Hazards 52, 79–95 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9358-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9358-3

Keywords

Navigation