Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Severity–duration–frequency curves in the mitigation of drought impact: an agricultural case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Severity–duration–frequency (SDF) curves are very useful in the analysis of drought phenomena. Station-level information obtained from SDF curves can be interpolated to obtain severity maps for fixed return period, in order to jointly analyse the spatial variability of drought characteristics (e.g. severity, duration and frequency). This approach is limited because the severity is usually quantified through indices that use hydrological and meteorological data, depending on the type of requirements. Therefore, drought indices can only reflect hydrological conditions, but are unable to quantify economic losses associated with droughts. In other words, SDF curves do not allow effective quantification of the impact expected with a certain return period. This paper proposes the methodology drought economic risk assessment (DERA) as an approach that emphasizes the importance of the relationship between a generic drought index (which quantifies water deficit) and the economic impact of the failure to meet water demand. Using integrated SDF curves, this relationship enables drought severity and corresponding impacts to be mapped. This procedure was applied to agricultural droughts (sunflower crop) in Umbria Region (central Italy). The agricultural drought impact variable was identified by sunflower yield (Y); the economic impact variable by net benefit depletion (EL); and the drought index by Relative Severity Index (RSI), which is quantifiable by a soil–water balance model. The relationships Y = g(RSI) and EL = f(Y) were specifically determined. Using DERA, it was possible to derive curves for SDF, impact–duration–frequency, and economic losses–duration–frequency (ELDF), which were then used to map severity, impact and economic losses for the assigned return period and duration. From the ELDF curves, further information was obtained by mapping critical drought durations for the assigned return period and economic loss threshold. The case study supports the potential of the proposed approach, both in the planning and real-time management of drought effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome

  • Alley W (1985) The palmer Drought Severity Index as a measure of hydrological drought. J Am Water Resour As 21(1):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalezios NR, Papazafiriou ZG, Papamichail DM, Karakostas TS (1991) Drought assessment for the potential of precipitation enhancement in Northern Greece. Theoret Appl Climatol 44:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalezios NR, Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Liiakopoulos E (2000) Severity–duration–frequency analysis of droughts and wet periods in Greece. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):751–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTar WR (2008) Yield and growth characteristics for cotton under various irrigation regimes on sandy soil. Agr Water Manage 95:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper 33, FAO, Rome

  • Embrechts P, Lindskog F, McNeil AJ (2001) Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. Switzerland

  • Favre A-C, Adlouni SE, Perreault L, Thiemonge N, Bobée B (2004) Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resour Res 40:W01101

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez B, Vergara A (1998) Risk of scarcity of monthly precipitation and streamflows in semiarid regions. Hydrol Sci J 43(5):759–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hexem RW, Heady EO (1978) Water production functions for irrigated agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao SC, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl T, Quinlan F, Ezell DZ (1987) Drought termination and amelioration: its climatological probability. J Clim Appl Meteorol 26:1198–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP, Burnell DG, Everson DO, Thomson A (1983) Estimating missing daily maximum and minimum temperatures. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22:1587–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lana X, Serra C, Burgueňo A (1998) Spatial and temporal characterization of annual extreme droughts in Catalonia (Northern Spain). Int J Clim 18:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makris I (1995) Severity–duration–frequency relationship of drought periods for agroclimatic design. Diploma thesis. Department of Agriculture, University of Thessaly, Greece (in Greek)

  • Mannocchi F, Mecarelli P (1987) A mathematical model to define regional agricultural droughts. In: Proceedings of 18th Pittsburgh conference on modelling and simulation 23–24 April, 18 (5) pp 1803–1807

  • Mannocchi F, Todisco F, Casadei S, Crea R (2001) La modellazione matematica e l’utilizzo dei GIS nella gestione ottimale della risorsa idrica. In: Ingegneria Agraria per lo sviluppo dei paesi del Mediterraneo Vieste (Italy), 11–14 settembre (in Italian)

  • Mannocchi F, Todisco F, Vergni L (2009) A new methodology for the risk analysis and economic impact assessment of agricultural droughts. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 135(5):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time steps. In: Preprints, 8th conference on applied climatology. AMS, Anaheim, CA, pp 179–184

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391(1–2):202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monotti M, Conti D, Laureti D et al (2004) Girasole: conferme e novità della sperimentazione varietale 2003. L’Informatore Agrario 10:47–55 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsiakos B (1995) The mountain communities of North Pindos: in the aftermath of long endurance. Plethron Press, Athens (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought research paper. 45. U.S. Weather Bureau, Washington, DC

  • Prout N, Dalezios NR, Manore M, Tracey J, Brown R, Walker GR (1986) Agricultural drought: precipitation deficiency and NOA-AVHRR index comparisons. In: Proceedings of Canadian Hydrol Symp (GHS:86), Regina Saskatchewan, 3–6 Jube, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council, Canada: 91–100

  • Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron J 101:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghafian B, Shokoohi A, Raziei T (2003) Drought spatial analysis and development of severity–duration–frequency curves for an arid region. Hydrol Mediterr Semiarid Reg IAHS Publ 278:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z (1998) Probabilistic formulation of spatio-temporal drought pattern. Theor Appl Climatol 61:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resour Manage 20:795–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Modarres R (2009) Copula-based drought severity–duration–frequency analysis in Iran. Meteorol Appl 16:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl K, Demuth S (1999) Linking streamflow drought to the occurrence of atmospheric circulation patterns. Hydrol Sci J 44(3):467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Raes D, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron J 101:426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (1983) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, USA

  • Teegavarapu RSV, Chandramouli V (2005) Improved weighting methods, deterministic and stochastic data-driven models for estimation of missing precipitation records. J Hydrol 312:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todisco F, Vergni L, Mannocchi F (2009) An operative approach to the agricultural droughts risk management. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 135(5):654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic M, Albrizio R, Zivotic L, Abi Saab M, Stöckle C, Steduto P (2009) Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron J 101:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergni L, Todisco F (2011) Spatio-temporal variability of precipitation, temperature and agricultural drought indices in Central Italy. Agric For Meteorol 151:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yevjevich V (1967) An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. Hydrol Pap 23, Colo. State University, Fort Collins

  • Yoo C, Dahea K, Tae-Woong K, Kyu-Nam H (2008) Quantification of drought using a rectangular pulses poisson process model. J Hydrol 355:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Chen YD, Chen YD, Li J (2011) Copula-based analysis of hydrological extremes and implications of hydrological behaviors in the Pearl river basin, China. J Hydrol Eng 16(7):598–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li J, Singh VP (2012a) Application of Archimedean copulas in the analysis of the precipitation extremes: effects of precipitation changes. Theoret Appl Climatol 107(1–2):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Singh VP, Li J, Jiang F, Bai Y (2012b) Spatio-temporal variations of precipitations extremes in Xinjiang, China. J Hydrol 434–435:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy

    F. Todisco, F. Mannocchi & L. Vergni

Authors
  1. F. Todisco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Mannocchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Vergni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Vergni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Todisco, F., Mannocchi, F. & Vergni, L. Severity–duration–frequency curves in the mitigation of drought impact: an agricultural case study. Nat Hazards 65, 1863–1881 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0446-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0446-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation