Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Landslide susceptibility deterministic approach using geographic information systems: application to Breaza town, Romania

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study is a deterministic-based approach on landslide susceptibility. The purpose of the paper is to create quantitative susceptibility maps by joining the one-dimension infinite slope stability model with a raster-based GIS (ILWIS) and taking into account the spatial distribution of input parameters. A landslide-prone area, with relative homogeneous geology and geomorphology, located in the Subcarpathian sector of the Prahova River, Romania, was selected for the study. There are frequent problems caused by active landslides in the studied area, especially in years with heavy precipitation, often causing destruction of houses and roads situated on the slopes (1992, 1997, and 2005). Detailed surveys covering a 7-year period provided the necessary input data on slope parameters, hydrological components, and the geotechnical background. Two simulations were used: one on dry soil conditions and one on fully saturated soil conditions. A third test was based on the level of the groundwater table mapped in summer 2008. Detailed analyses were particularly focused on landslides to compare predicted results with actual results using field measurements. The model is very suitable for use in raster GIS because it can calculate slope instability on a pixel basis, each raster cell being considered individually. The drawback of the model is the highly detailed data of input parameters. Despite this disadvantage, in conclusion, the usefulness of slope stability models on a large-scale basis was emphasized under infinitely high failure plain conditions and lithological homogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander DE (1991) Applied geomorphology and the impact of natural hazards on the built environment. Nat Hazards 4(1):57–80. doi:10.1007/BF00126559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander DE (1992) The causes of landslides: human activities, perception, and natural processes. Environ Geol Water Sci 20(3):165–179. doi:10.1007/BF01706160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander DE (2008) A brief survey of GIS in mass-movement studies, with reflections on theory and methods. Geomorphology 94:261–267. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armaş I, Damian R (2006) Evolutive interpretation of the Landslides from the Miron Căproiu Street Scarp (Eternităţii Street—V. Alecsandri Street)—Breaza Town. Revista de Geomorfologie 8:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Armaş I, Damian R, Şandric I, Osaci-Costache G (2003) Vulnerabilitatea versanţilor subcarpatici la alunecări de teren (Valea Prahovei), ed. Fundaţiei România de Mâine, Bucharest

  • Avanzi GA, Falaschi EF, Giannecchini ER, Puccinelli EA (2009) Soil slip susceptibility assessment using mechanical–hydrological approach and GIS techniques: an application in the Apuan Alps (Italy). Nat Hazards 50:591–603. doi:10.1007/s11069-009-9357-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsden D, Prior DB (1984) Slope stability. Wiley, New York, 620pp

  • Bozzano F, Cipriani I, Mazzanti P, Prestininzi A (2007) Displacement patterns of a landslide affected by human activities: insights from ground-based InSAR monitoring. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9840-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Capparelli G, Biondi D, De Luca D, Versace P (2009) Hydrological and complete models for forecasting landslides triggered by rainfalls. In: Proceedings of the first Italian workshop on landslides. Versace Università della Calabria, Rende, Napoli, pp 162–173

  • Carrara A, Pike R (2008) GIS technology and models for assessing landslide hazard and risk. Geomorphology 94:257–260. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard. Nat Hazards 20(2–3):117–135. doi:10.1023/A:1008097111310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Kim NK (2004) The evaluation and the sensitivity analysis of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models. Geosci J 8(4):415–423. doi:10.1007/BF02910477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30:451–472. doi:10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007172.62651.2b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Frattini P (2003) Distributed modelling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 81–93. doi:10.5194/nhess-3-81-2003

  • Crosta PB, Frattini P (2008) Preface rainfall-induced landslides and debris flows. Hydrol Process 22(4):473–477. doi:10.1002/hyp.6885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Special report 247: landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

  • Dietrich WE, Bellugi D, Real de Asua R (2001) Validation of the shallow landslide model, SHALSTAB, for forest management. In: Wigmosta MS, Burges SJ (eds) Land use and watersheds: human influence on hydrology and geomorphology in urban and forest areas, American Geophysical Union, Water Science and Applications 2:195–227. doi:10.1029/WS002p0195

  • EM-DAT (Emergency events database) (2006) OFDA/CRED Retrieved from International Disaster Database from http://www.cred.be/emdat, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels. Accessed March 2006

  • Gorsevski PV (2002) Landslide hazard modeling using GIS. Ph.D. thesis, University of Idaho

  • Guzzetti F (2005) Landslide hazard and risk assessment. Dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multiscale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1–4):181–216. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highland LM, Bobrowsky P (2008) The landslide handbook—a guide to understanding landslides, 1325. US Geological Survey Circular, Reston, p 129

  • Hoek E, Bray JW (1997) Rock slope engineering, 3rd edn. IMM E&FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergili M, Fellin W, Moreiras St M, Stotter J (2012) Simulation of debris flow in the Central Andes based on Open Source GIS: possibilities, limitations, and parameter sensitivity. Nat Hazards 61:1051–1081. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9965-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically-based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30:1153–1171. doi:10.1029/93WR02979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntohar AS, Liao HJ (2010) Rainfall infiltration: infinite slope model for landslides triggering by rainstorm. Nat Hazards 54:967–984. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9518-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parichi M, Armaş I, Vartolomei F (2006) Pedological and morphodynamic aspects in Subcarpathian sector of Prahova Valley. Analele Spiru Haret 9:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN (1999) Failure envelopes of mudrocks at high effective stresses. In: Aplin AC, Fleet AJ, Macquaker JHS (eds) Physical properties of mud and mudstones, Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 158

  • Roslee R, Jamaluddin TA, Talip MA (2012) Intergration of GIS Using GEOSTAtistical INterpolation Techniques (Kriging) (GEOSTAINT-K). In: Deterministic models for landslide susceptibility analysis (LSA) at Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, J Geogr Geol 4(1):18–32. doi: 10.5539/jgg.v4n1p18

  • Safaei M, Omar H, Huat BK, Yousof ZBM, Ghiasi V (2011) Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantage and limitation. EJGE:1691–1650, http://www.ejge.com/2011/Ppr11.177/Ppr11.177alr.pdf

  • Schuster RL (1995a) Keynote paper: recent advances in slope stabilization. In: Bell Ed., Landslides, Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Schuster RL (1995b) Socioeconomic significance of landslides. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides, investigation and mitigation, transportation research board special report, 247. National Academy Press, WA

  • Schuster RL, Fleming RW (1986) Economic losses and fatalities due to landslides. Bull Am As Eng Geol 23(1)

  • Sidle RC (1984) Relative importance of factors influencing landsliding in coastal Alaska. 21st Annual engineering geology and soils engineering symposium. University of Idaho, Moscow, pp 311–325

  • Skempton AW, De Lory FA (1957) Stability of natural slopes in London clay. In: Proceedings 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2. pp 378–381

  • Soeters R, van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides, investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, special report 247, National Academy Press, Washington, pp 129–177

  • Stroia F, Armaş I, Damian R (2005) Earth sliding recently revival in Breaza area on Prahova Valley. In: Proceeding of international symposium on latest natural disasters—new challenges for engineering geology, geotechnics and civil protection, Bulgaria National Group of IAEG, Abstract Book p. 93, CD section 20: 6, Sofia

  • Teodorescu A (1984) Proprietatile rocilor, ed. Tehnica, Bucharest

  • Terzaghi K (1925) Erdbaumechanik auf Bodenphysikalischer Grundlage. Franz Deuticke, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thaiyuenwong S, Maireang W (2010) Triggered-rainfall landslide hazard prediction. Res Dev J 21(2):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Travelletti J, Oppikofer T, Delacourt C, Malet JP, Jaboyedoff M (2008) Monitoring landslide displacements during a controlled rain experiment using a long-range terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XXXVII. Part B5. Beijing

  • Ulmer M, Molnar P, Purves R (2009) Influence of DEM and soil property uncertainty on an infinite slope stability model. In: Proceedings of geomorphometry 2009. Zurich

  • US Geological Survey (1997) US geological survey landslide hazards program five-year plan 1998–2002. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • UN/ISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2004) Living with risk. A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. 2004 version. United Nations, Geneva, p. 430. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/about_isdr/bd-lwr-2004-eng.htm. Accessed Jan 2012

  • van Westen CJ (2000) The modelling of landslide hazards using GIS. Surv Geophys 21:241–255. doi:10.1023/A:1006794127521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ. and Terlien, M.T.J. (1996) An approach towards deterministic landslide hazard analysis in GIS: a case study from Manizales, Colombia. In: Earth surface processes and landforms: the journal of the British geomorphological research group, 9, pp 853–868

  • van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MT, Soeters R (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geol Rundsch 86(2):404–414. doi:10.1007/s005310050149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Env 65:167–184. doi:10.1007/s10064-005-0023-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol 102(3–4):112–131. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Special report 176: landslides: analysis and control, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

  • Vartolomei F, Armaş I (2010) The intensification of the anthropic pressure through the expansion of the constructed area in the subcarpathian sector of the Prahova Valley/Romania (1800–2008). Forum Geogr 9:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • WP/WLI (International Geotechnical Societies UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory) (1990) A suggested method for reporting a landslide. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 41:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • WP/WLI (International Geotechnical Societies UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory) (1993) A suggested method for describing the activity of a landslide. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 47:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Sidle RC (1995) A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resour Res 31(8):2097–2110. doi:10.1029/95WR01136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong H, Hiromasa H, Kazuo S, Kyoji S, Akira S, Hiroshi F, Gonghui W (2005) The influence of intense rainfall on the activity of large-scale crystalline schist landslides in Shikoku Island, Japan. Landslides 2(2):97–105. doi:10.1007/s10346-004-0043-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the National Research Council (CNCS) of Romania through the project No. 2916/31 GR, having prof. I. Armas as Principal Investigator. The authors wish to express their thanks to Dr. Martin Mergili from The Institute of Applied Geology in Vienna and to an anonymous reviewer for their valuable support and constructive comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Iuliana Armaş, Florica Stroia & Livioara Braşoveanu

  2. Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania

    Florin Vartolomei

Authors
  1. Iuliana Armaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florin Vartolomei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Florica Stroia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Livioara Braşoveanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iuliana Armaş.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armaş, I., Vartolomei, F., Stroia, F. et al. Landslide susceptibility deterministic approach using geographic information systems: application to Breaza town, Romania. Nat Hazards 70, 995–1017 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0857-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0857-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation