Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transport system management under extreme weather risks: views to project appraisal, asset value protection and risk-aware system management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until recently, research on potential economic impacts of climate change and extreme weather events on transport infrastructure was scarce, but currently this area is rapidly expanding. Indeed, there is a growing international interest, including the European area, regarding the impacts of extreme weather and climate change on the management of various transportation modes. This paper reviews briefly the present status regarding the knowledge of financial aspects of extreme weather impacts on transportation, using recent research findings from Europe, and proposes some new views in cost-benefit analysis, project appraisal and asset value protection for the management of transport systems under extreme weather risks. Quite often, risk management is understood as a response to truly extreme impacts, but this constitutes a misunderstanding. Some values are more extreme than others, and in the context of extreme weather, some weather phenomena are more extreme in their intensity and resulting impacts. An analysis of the level of costs and risks to societies, as a result of extreme weather, reveals that the risks in different European Union member states deviate substantially from each other. Also, the preparedness of different societies to deal with extreme weather events is quite variable. Extreme weather and climate change costs and risks represent a new type of item, which has to be dealt with in project appraisal. Although a fully established procedure does not exist, some fundamental ideas of cost-benefit analysis under extreme weather scenarios are presented in this paper, considering accident costs, time costs and infrastructure-related costs (comprising physical damages to infrastructures and increased maintenance costs). Cost-benefit analysis is usually associated with capital investments, but the original idea of cost-benefit analysis is not restricted to investment appraisal. Therefore, activities such as enhanced maintenance, minor upgrades, adoption of new designs, improved information services and others may be subject to cost-benefit analysis. Extreme weather and climate change costs and risks represent a new type of item, which apparently has to be dealt with also in project appraisal. A fully established procedure does not exist, although some basic principles have been introduced in analytical format. There is a lack of models to estimate extreme weather impacts and consequences and how to adapt to those costs. Optimising the efforts in maintenance and new design standards is even further away, but constitutes an overwhelming task. In this respect, new approaches and ways of thinking in preserving asset’s residual value, return periods, sustainability and equity and formal methods supplementing cost-benefit analysis are put forward. The paper concludes with a call for the need for more integrated management of transport systems. In particular, it is recognised that the different stages of transport system planning pose their own challenges when assessing the costs and benefits of policy measures, strategies and operational decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Residual value is usually treated as “a cash inflow” for the project (Van Horne and Wachowicz 2001). But alternatively it could be used by subtracting it from the investment cost C. The end result of both approaches is similar, provided that the chosen manner of application is uniform across the calculus.

  2. http://www.investopedia.com/university/advancedbond/advancedbond4.asp#ixzz2DbXU7lhP.

  3. One of the basic definitions of an investment is the following: investment is reducing today’s consumption in order to enhance future consumption. In other words, an investment is an economic sacrifice done today in order to be better off later.

References

  • Andrey J, Mills B, Leahy M, Suggett J (2003) Weather as a chronic hazard for road transportation in Canadian cities. Nat Hazards 28:319–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasatos S, Michaelides S, Papadakis M (2013) Identification of weather trends for use as a component of risk management for port operations. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-12-491-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Bläsche J, Kreuz M, Mühlhausen T, Schweighofer J, Leviäkangas P, Molarius R, Nokkala M, Athanasatos S, Michaelides S, Papadakis M, Ludvigsen J (2012) Consequences of extreme weather. http://ewent.vtt.fi/Deliverables/D3/EWENT_D34_v12_20120209.pdf

  • Botzen WJW, van den Bergh JCJM, Bouwe LM (2010) Climate change and increased risk for the insurance sector: a global perspective and an assessment for the Netherlands. Nat Hazards 52:577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin K, Delink R, Agrawala S (2009) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: integrated assessment modelling of adaptation costs and benefits. OECD Environment Working papers No. 6. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/225282538105

  • Eijgenraam CJJ, Koopmans CC, Tang PJG, Verster ACP (2000) Evaluation of infrastructural projects; guide for cost-benefit analysis. Section I: main report. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis and Netherlands Economic Institute

  • Florio M, Maffii S, Atkinson G, De Rus G, Evans D, Ponti M, Genco M, Parolin R, Vignetti S, Bollati J, Giglio M, Panza M, Sartori D (2008) Guide to cost benefit analysis of investment projects. European Commission

  • Frankhauser S, Smith JB, Tol RSJ (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol Econ 30:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hector D, Christensen C, Petrie J (2009) A problem-structuring method for complex societal decisions: its philosophical and psychological dimensions. Eur J Oper Res 193:693–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government (2011) Climate resilient infrastructure: preparing for a changing climate. Report presented to UK Parliament by the Secretary of the State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by the Command of Her Majesty, UK

  • HM Treasury (2012) The stern review on the economics of climate change. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sternreview_index.html

  • Keeney RL (2007) Developing objectives and attributes. In: Edwards W, Miles RF, von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Gregory RS (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper Res 53:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviäkangas P, Lähesmaa J (2002) Profitability evaluation of intelligent transport system investments. J Transp Eng ASCE 128:276–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leviäkangas P, Tuominen A, Molarius R, Kojo H (eds) (2011) Extreme weather impacts on transport systems. EWENT Deliverable D1. VTT Working Papers No. 168. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/workingpapers/2011/W168.pdf

  • Leviäkangas P, Saarikivi P, Nurmi P, Nurmi V, Perrels A, Vajda A, Mühlhausen T, Nokkala M, Molarius R, Ludvigsen J, Schweighofer J, Groenemeijer P, Tuomenvirta H, Juga I, Kreuz M, Bläsche J, Zulkarnain Rönty J, Könönen V, Hietajärvi A-M, Askola H, Auvinen H, Tuominen A, Siedl N, Michaelides S, Athanasatos A, Papadakis M, Ivanov D, Dotzek N (2012) European extreme weather risk management: needs, opportunities, costs and recommendations. EWENT project deliverable, VTT. http://ewent.vtt.fi/Deliverables/D6/Ewent_D6_SummaryReport_V07.pdf

  • Maibach M, Schreyer C, Sutter D, van Essen HP, Boon BH, Smokers R, Schroten A, Doll C, Pawlowska B, Bak M (2008) Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector. Internalisation measures and policies for all external costs of transport (IMPACT). Version 1.1, Delft, CE. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/sustainable/doc/2008_costs_handbook.pdf

  • Makkonen L (2006) Plotting positions in extreme value analysis. J Appl Meteorol Clim 45:334–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen L (2008) Problems in the extreme value analysis. Struct Saf 30:405–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • McBean G (2004) Climate change and extreme weather: a basis for action. Nat Hazards 31:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molarius R, Leviäkangas P, Rönty J, Oiva K (eds) (2012) Weather hazards and vulnerabilities for the European transport system: a risk panorama. VTT Technology 43. http://ewent.vtt.fi/Deliverables/D5/Ewent_RiskPanorama_www.pdf

  • Mühlhausen T, Kreuz M, Bläsche J, Schweighofer J, Leviäkangas P, Molarius R, Nokkala M, Athanasatos S, Michaelides S, Papadakis M (2011) Consequences of extreme weather. EWENT Deliverable D3. http://ewent.vtt.fi/Deliverables/D3/EWENT_D34_v12_20120209.pdf

  • Munich Re (2012) Severe weather in North America: perils; risks; insurance. Executive summary. Munich Re Knowledge Series—Natural Hazards publication

  • Nokkala M, Leviäkangas P, Oiva K, Hietajärvi A-M, Schweighofer J, Siedl N, Vajda A, Athanasatos S, Michaelides S, Papadakis M, Kreuz M, Mühlhausen T, Ludvigsen J, Klæboe R (2012) The costs of extreme weather for the European transport system: EWENT project D4. In: Nokkala M, Leviäkangas P, Oiva K (eds) VTT Technology 36, Espoo, p 92. http://ewent.vtt.fi/Deliverables/D4/T36.pdf

  • Pearce D, Atkinson G, Mourato S (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. OECD, p 314

  • Przyluski V, Hallegatte A, Nadaud F, Tomozeiu R, Cacciamani C, Pavan V, Doll C (2012) Weather extremes: assessment of impacts on transport systems and hazards for European regions: deliverable 1: weather trends and economy-wide impacts. Version: 2.0 (unapproved revised draft), Fraunhofer. http://www.weather-project.eu/weather/downloads/Deliverables/WEATHER_D1_Scenarios-Impacts_v2-0_unapproved-revision.pdf

  • Sanchez A, Doll C, Heyndrickx C, Nokkala M, Leviäkangas P (2012) Transport services and infrastructure. In: Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012: an indicator-based report. Report No 12/2012, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, pp 205–208, ISBN 978-92-9213-346-7, ISSN 1725-9177. doi:10.2800/66071

  • Schweighofer J (2013) The impact of extreme weather and climate change on inland waterway transport. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0541-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair P (2011) Describing the elephant: a framework for supporting sustainable development processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:2990–2998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1994) Discount rates: the rate of discount for benefit-cost analysis and the theory of second best. In: Layard R, Glaister S (eds) Cost-benefit analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–159

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Time (2011) Sticker shock: what extreme weather costs the US? http://science.time.com/2011/06/27/sticker-shock-what-extreme-weather-costs-the-u-s/

  • Vajda A, Tuomenvirta H, Jokinen P, Luomaranta A, Makkonen L, Tikanmäki M, Groenemeijer P, Saarikivi P, Michaelides S, Papadakis M, Tymvios F, Athanasatos S (2011) Probabilities of adverse weather affecting transport in Europe: climatology and scenarios up to the 2050s. Report No. 2011:9, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/28592

  • Van Horne JC, Wachowicz JM (2001) Fundamentals of financial management, 11th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston JF, Brigham EF (1976) Managerial finance, 4th edn. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) 4° Turn down the heat: why a 4 °C warmer world must be avoided. A report for the World Bank by the Potsdam Institute for climate impact research and climate analysis. http://climatechange.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Turn_Down_the_heat_Why_a_4_degree_centrigrade_warmer_world_must_be_avoided.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

The EWENT project consortium is acknowledged for successful cooperation and delivering path-breaking results. EWENT was co-funded by the European Commission under its 7th Framework Programme, Transport, Horizontal activities (Grant No. 233919). The OECD’s International Transport Forum working group on Climate Change, Extreme Weather and Transport Infrastructures is acknowledged for stimulating further consideration of EWENT’s results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Michaelides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leviäkangas, P., Michaelides, S. Transport system management under extreme weather risks: views to project appraisal, asset value protection and risk-aware system management. Nat Hazards 72, 263–286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0970-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0970-x

Keywords

Navigation