Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In January 2011, Brisbane, Australia, experienced its first significant flooding in almost four decades. This paper presents the results of a questionnaire conducted in four affected inner western suburbs 7 months after the flood. These locations were specifically chosen as the residents within these communities come from a range of demographic, social, and economic backgrounds. The research utilised a mixed methods approach involving a quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interviews. This paper examines residents’ experience of the flood, their thoughts on risk reduction and insurance, what factors helped or hindered response and adaptation to flood risk, and how to articulate shared responsibility for reducing flood risk. Assessing gender, age, income, and previous flood experience, it finds that those with previous flood experience were more likely to have flood insurance but less likely to have taken precautions to prepare for the flood. While almost three-quarters of respondents said they were aware of the flood risk when they moved to the area, they were nonetheless surprised by and largely unprepared for the 2011 flood. The implications of these findings for future flood risk reduction are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16:268–281. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attorney General’s Department (2009) National Strategy for Disaster Resilience: building our nation’s resilience to disasters. Australian Government, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) QuickStats 2011Census Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/quickstats?opendocument&navpos=220. Accessed 13 Mar 2013

  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2000) Report 7: consumer understanding of flood insurance, Victoria

  • Bird D, King D, Haynes K, Box P, Okada T, Nairn K (2013) Impact of the 2010/11 floods and the factors that inhibit and enable household adaptation strategies: a Report for the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility Synthesis and Integrative Research Program, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility

  • Bligh A (2011) Force insurance companies to pay up. Ministerial Media Statements. http://statements.cabinet.qld.gov.au/MMS/StatementDisplaySingle.aspx?id=76828. Accessed 28 Sept 2011

  • Box P, Thomalla F, van den Honert R, McAneney J (2012) How can residents know their flood risk? a review of online flood information availability in Australia. Aust Plan 49(4):339–348. doi:10.1080/07293682.2012.678871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box P, Thomalla F, van den Honert R (2013) Flood risk in Australia: whose responsibility is it, anyway? Water 5:1580–1597. doi:10.3390/w5041580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisbane City Council (1999) Brisbane river flood study. Brisbane City Council, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisbane City Council (2011) Voluntary home purchase scheme: information for flood affected residents. http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/downloads/community/community_safety/Voluntary_Home_Purchase_Scheme_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2013

  • Brisbane City Council (2013) Fact sheet—Brisbane City Council two year flood recovery update—January 2013. http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/community/community-safety/disasters-and-emergencies/types-of-disasters/flooding/recovering-after-the-floods/2-year-flood-recovery-update/index.htm. Accessed 10 June 2013

  • Brown V, Smith DI, Wiseman R, Handmer J (1995) Risks and opportunities: managing environmental conflict and change. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Meteorology (2013) Known Floods in the Brisbane and Bremer River Basin, Bureau of Meteorology. http://www.bom.gov.au/qld/flood/fld_history/brisbane_history.shtml. Accessed 7 Jan 2013

  • Burn DH (1999) Perceptions of flood risk: a case study of the Red River flood of 1997. Water Resour Res 35(11):3451–3458. doi:10.1029/1999WR900215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burningham K, Fielding J, Thrush D (2008) ‘It’ll never happen to me’: understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters 32:216–238. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1968) The human ecology of extreme geophysical events: natural hazards research working paper 1. Toronto

  • Carter RA (2012) Flood risk, insurance and emergency management in Australia. Aust J Emerg Manag 27(2):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie N (2011) Review of the 2010–11 flood warnings & response interim report. State Government of Victoria, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2011) Natural Disaster Insurance Review: Inquiry into flood insurance and related matters September 2011. Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly C (2011) Natural Disaster Insurance Review: a consumer perspective on the NDIR issues paper. Transia Pty Ltd

  • Council of Australian Governments (2011) National Strategy for Disaster Resilience. Building the resilience of our nation to disasters. Council of Australian Governments. Canberra, Australia

  • Crompton RP, McAneney KJ (2008) Normalised Australian insured losses from meteorological hazards: 1967–2006. Environ Sci Policy 11(5):371–378. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter S (2010) Social science perspectives on hazards and vulnerability science. In: Beer T (ed) Geophysical hazards. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2005) Making space for water: taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Crown copyright, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufty N (2007) Roles and responsibilities for VICSES in Flood Education. Victoria State Emergency Service, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O, Day S, Roberts S (2004) Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards. Geoscience Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Eburn M, Dovers S (2012) Sharing responsibility with governments and their agencies. 3rd Human Dimensions of Wildland Fire, International Association of Wildland Fire, Missoula

    Google Scholar 

  • Emergency Management Australia (2002) Planning safer communities: land use planning for natural hazards. Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillard J. (2011) Transcript of press conference. Brisbane, Prime Minister of Australia. http://www.pm.gov.au/press-office/transcript-press-conference-brisbane. Accessed 21 Jan 2011

  • Gissing A, Keys C, Opper S (2010) Towards resilience against flood risks. Aust J Emerg Manag 25(2):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR, Brody S, Burby R (2003) Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: challenges for comprehensive planning. J Environ Plan Manag 46(5):733–754. doi:10.1080/0964056032000138463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory G, Loveridge A, Gough J (1997) Social and cultural aspects of natural hazards perception and response. N Z Geogr 53:47–54. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7939.1997.tb00476.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg TJ (1977) A comprehensive evaluation of the proposed Wivenhoe Dam on the Brisbane River: an examination of the economic, financial, social and environmental effects: a report prepared for the Co-ordinator General’s Dept. Brisbane, Queensland, Co-ordinator General’s Department

  • Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson RO, Noulles D, Bellovich SJ (1982) Knowledge, warning, and stress: a study of comparative roles in an urban floodplain. Environ Behav 14(2):171–185. doi:10.1177/0013916584142003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes K, Coates L, Leigh R, Handmer J, Whittaker J, Gissing A, McAneney J, Opper S (2009) ‘Shelter-in-place’ vs. evacuation in flash floods. Environ Hazards 8(4):291–303. doi:10.3763/ehaz.2009.0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst D (2011) Mayor bemoans flood web woes. brisbanetimes.com.au. http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/mayor-bemoans-flood-web-woes-20110118-19uxt.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2013

  • Insurance Council of Australia (2011) 10 Point Plan to Tackle Disasters. Media Release. http://www.insurancecouncil.com.au/assets/media/ica-release—ten-point-plan-27th.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2011

  • Johnson CL, Priest SJ (2008) Flood risk management in England: a changing landscape of risk responsibility? Int J Water Resour Dev 24(8):513–525. doi:10.1080/07900620801923146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston E, Needham K, Tovey J (2011) Insurers say no to Brisbane. Sydney Morning Herald, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Flood Taskforce (2011) Joint Flood Taskforce Report, Brisbane City Council National Disaster Insurance Review: Inquiry into flood insurance and related matters Commonwealth of Australia

  • Kellens W, Terpstra T, De Maeyer P (2012) Perception and communication of flood risk: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal 33:24–49. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh D, Apan A, Mushtaq S, King D, Thomas M (2011) Resilience, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of an inland rural town prone to flooding: a climate change adaptation case study of Charleville, Queensland, Australia. Nat Hazards 59(2):699–723. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9791-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King D (2000) You’re on your own: community vulnerability and the need for awareness and education for predictable natural disasters. J Conting Crisis Manag 8:223–228. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.00143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King D (2001) Uses and limitations of socioeconomic indicators of community vulnerability to natural hazards: data and disasters in Northern Australia. Nat Hazards 24:147–156. doi:10.1023/A:1011859507188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh R (2006) An estimate of the number of residential properties in Australia liable to inundation by an ARI 100-year flood: Report Prepared for the Insurance Council of Australia. July 2005 (Revised March 2006), Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University

  • Lo AY (2013) The likelihood of having flood insurance increases with social expectations. Area 45:70–76. doi:10.1111/area.12002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy SS (2004) Definition and experience of flooding: residents’ and officials’ perspectives. University of Surrey, Guildford

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure J (2006) Guidelines for encouraging householders’ preparation for earthquakes in New Zealand, Report for Building Research, Victoria University of Wellington

  • McClure J, Wills C, Johnston D, Recker C (2011) How the 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake affected earthquake risk perception: comparing citizens inside and outside the earthquake region. Aust J Disaster Trauma Stud 2011–12:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan B, Handmer J (2012a) Reframing responsibility-sharing for bushfire risk management in Australia after Black Saturday. Environ Hazards 11(1):1–15. doi:10.1080/17477891.2011.608835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan B, Handmer J (2012b) Changing the rules of the game: mechanisms that shape responsibility-sharing from beyond Australian fire and emergency management. Aus J Emerg Manag 27(2):7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson HJ, Saarinen TF (1977) Flood plain dwellers’ perception of the flood hazard in Tucson, Arizona. Ann Reg Sci 11(2):25–40. doi:10.1007/BF01287852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (2011) Council salutes mud army. brisbanetimes.com.au. http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/council-salutes-mud-army-20110208-1altl.html. Accessed 1 Mar 13

  • Nicholls S (2012) The resilient community and communication practice. Aust J Emerg Manag 27(1):46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2003) Disaster preparedness: a social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prev Manag 12(3):210–216. doi:10.1108/09653560310480686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 28(2–3):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest M, Ludlow M, Bajkowski J, Cleary A, Mather J (2011) Insurance shake-up looms. The Australian Financial Review

  • Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry (2011) Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry. Interim Report, Brisbane

  • Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry (2012) Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry. Final Report

  • Queensland Reconstruction Authority (2011) Planning for stronger, more resilient floodplains Part 1—interim measures to support floodplain management in existing planning schemes (Draft). Queensland Government, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez R (1999) Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. In: Buckles D (ed) Cultivating peace: conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. IDRC, Ottawa, pp 101–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan G, Renouf G (2006) Risk and reality: access to general insurance for people on low incomes. Brotherhood of St Laurence, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2008) Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: people cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Anal 28:771–778. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh-Peterson L, Salmon P, Baldwin C, Goode N (2015) Deconstructing the concept of shared responsibility for disaster resilience: a Sunshine Coast case study, Australia. Nat Hazards 79:755–774. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1871-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SLI 2012 No. 116 Insurance Contracts Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1), (2012)

  • Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19(4):689–701. doi:10.1023/A:1007041821623

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DI, Handmer JW (2002) Residential Flood Insurance: The Implications for Floodplain Management Policy. Water Research Foundation of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr J (2011) Floods, earthquakes and insurance coverage: issues, problems and solutions. Aust Bus Law Rev 39(2):111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra T, Gutterling JM (2008) Household’s perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. Int J Water Resour Dev 24(4):555–565. doi:10.1080/07900620801923385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieken AH, Petrow T, Kreibich H, Merz B (2006) Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany. Risk Anal 26:383–395. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Ollenburger JC (1992) Natural hazards and the elderly. FMHI Publications, Paper 16. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/fmhi_pub/16

  • van den Honert RC, McAneney J (2011) The 2011 Brisbane floods: causes, impacts and implications. Water 3(4):1149–1173. doi:10.3390/w3041149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan E (1995) The significance of socioeconomic and ethnic diversity for the risk communication process. Risk Anal 15(2):169–180. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00311.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker K, Bickerstaff G (2002) Risk, responsibility, and blame: an analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses. Environ Plan A 34(12):2175–2192. doi:10.1068/a3521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker G, Burningham K (2011) Flood risk, vulnerability, and environmental justice: evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context. Crit Soc Policy 31:216–240. doi:10.1177/0261018310396149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein ND (1989) Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychol Bull 105(1):31–50. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker J, Haynes K, Handmer J, McLennan J (2013) Community safety during the 2009 Australian ‘Black Saturday’ bushfires: an analysis of household preparedness and response. Int J Wildland Fire. doi:10.1071/WF12010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was part of a larger NCCARF-funded study on the 2010–2011 floods in three locations. The Brisbane fieldwork was completed by Pamela Box and Kate Nairn. Assistance in statistical analysis was provided by Robin van den Honert. Figure 1 was created by Keping Chen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Box.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Box, P., Bird, D., Haynes, K. et al. Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Nat Hazards 81, 1549–1568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2145-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2145-z

Keywords

Navigation