Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A fuzzy model to assess disaster risk reduction maturity level based on the Hyogo Framework for Action

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Hyogo Framework for Action was conceived to help nations build resilience against disasters. This framework was negotiated and approved by the United Nations at the World Conference on Disaster Reduction, held in Hyogo, Japan, in 2005. Disaster risk reductions systems are multi-agency integrated environment needing clear goals and ways to assess their evolution for planning purposes. The assessment of risk reduction maturity levels in countries/cities is difficult due to the large amount of data that must be collected and integrated to assess what is being done within each action indicated by the Hyogo Framework. Most indicators dependent on human perception are used in this assessment, making it highly dependent on the evaluators’ perceptions. The objective of this work is to propose a participatory fuzzy model able to assess the maturity level of disaster risk reduction using indicators in line with the Hyogo Framework. We apply the model and the evaluation method in an exploratory study in the city of Rio de Janeiro where there are several communities at risk of landslides due heavy rains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dolif G, Engelbrecht A, Jatobá A, Silva AJD, Gomes JO, Borges MRS, Nobre CA, Carvalho PVR (2013) Resilience and brittleness in the ALERTARIO system: a field study about the decision-making of forecasters. Nat Hazards 65(3):1831–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grecco CHS, Vidal M, Cosenza CAN, Santos IJAL, Carvalho PVR (2014) HFA 5 maturity assessment: a fuzzy model for improving safety performance in a radioactive installation. Prog Nucl Energy 70:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2008) Safety management e looking back or looking forward. In: Hollnagel E, Nemeth CP, Dekker S (eds) Resilience engineering perspectives, remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure, vol 1. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu H, Chen C (1996) Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović B, Filipovi J (2016) ISO 50001 standard-based energy management maturity model—proposal and validation in industry. J Clean Prod 112(4):2744–2755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HM (1996) Group decision making using fuzzy theory for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Fuzzy Sets Syst 80:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsona D, Wu D (2013) Extreme-event risk management: a review of “Lee, B., Preston, F., 2012. Preparing for high-impact, low-probability events: lessons from Eyjafjallajőkull, London: Chatham House. J Clean Prod 53(15):67–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W (1994) Why triangular membership functions? Fuzzy Sets Syst 64:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen W (2007) A public sector HPT maturity model. Perform Improv 46(4):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thabrew L, Wiek A, Ries R (2009) Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. J Clean Prod 17(1):67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2007) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. UNISDR, Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/

  • UNISDR (2008) Indicators of progress: guidance on measuring the reduction of disaster risks and the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action. UNISDR, Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/2259_IndicatorsofProgressHFA.pdf

  • Yager R, Filev D (1993) On the issue of defuzzification and selection based on a fuzzy set. Fuzzy Sets Syst 55:255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 3rd edn. Kluwer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Carvalho, P.V.R., dos Santos Grecco, C.H., de Souza, A.M. et al. A fuzzy model to assess disaster risk reduction maturity level based on the Hyogo Framework for Action. Nat Hazards 83, 309–326 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2316-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2316-y

Keywords

Navigation