Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Robustness of road systems to extreme flooding: using elements of GIS, travel demand, and network science

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to study the robustness of road networks to extreme flooding events that can negatively affect entire regional systems in a relatively unpredictable way. Here, we adopt a deterministic approach to simulate extreme flooding events in two cities, New York City and Chicago, by removing entire sections of road systems using U.S. FEMA floodplains. We then measure changes in the number of real trips that can be completed (using travel demand data), Geographical Information Systems properties, and network topological indicators. We notably measure and discuss how betweenness centrality is being redistributed after flooding. Broadly, robustness in spatial systems like road networks is dependent on many factors, including system size (number of nodes and links) and topological structure of the network. Expectedly, robustness also depends on geography, and cities that are naturally more at risk will tend to be less robust, and therefore the notion of robustness rapidly becomes sensitive to individual contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abowd JM, Haltiwanger J, Lane J (2004) Integrated longitudinal employer-employee data for the United States. Am Econ Rev 94:224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási A-L (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406:378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atun F (2014) Understanding effects of complexity in cities during disasters. In: Understanding complex urban systems: multidisciplinary approaches to modeling. Springer, pp 51–65

  • Ayyub BM (2014) Systems resilience for multihazard environments: definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Anal 34:340–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási A-L, Frangos J (2014) Linked: the new science of networks science of networks. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2013) The new science of cities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniston M, Stephenson DB, Christensen OB et al (2007) Future extreme events in European climate: an exploration of regional climate model projections. Clim Change 81:71–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP (1995) Centrality and AIDS. Connections 18:112–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Borlace S, Lengaigne M et al (2014) Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming. Nat Clim Change 4:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway DS, Newman ME, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ (2000) Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. Phys Rev Lett 85:5468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R, Erez K, Ben-Avraham D, Havlin S (2001) Breakdown of the Internet under intentional attack. Phys Rev Lett 86:3682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill CD, Derrible S (2015) Leveraging big data for the development of transport sustainability indicators. J Urban Technol 22:45–64. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.942094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel L (2003) Ripple effects: population and coastal regions. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Crucitti P, Latora V, Marchiori M (2004) Model for cascading failures in complex networks. Phys Rev E 69:045104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. Inter J Complex Syst 1695:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrible S (2012) Network centrality of metro systems. PLoS ONE 7:e40575. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrible S (2016a) Urban infrastructure is not a tree: integrating and decentralizing urban infrastructure systems. Environ Plan B Plan Des. http://epb.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/05/12/0265813516647063.abstract

  • Derrible S (2016b) Complexity in future cities: the rise of networked infrastructure. Int J Urban Sci. doi:10.1080/12265934.2016.1233075

  • Derrible S, Ahmad N (2015) Network-based and binless frequency analyses. PLoS ONE 10:e0142108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrible S, Kennedy C (2010) The complexity and robustness of metro networks. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl 389:3678–3691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrible S, Saneinejad S, Sugar L, Kennedy C (2010) Macroscopic model of greenhouse gas emissions for municipalities. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. doi:10.3141/2191-22

  • Duan Y, Lu F (2013) Structural robustness of city road networks based on community. Comput Environ Urban Syst 41:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C et al (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erath A, Birdsall J, Axhausen KW, Hajdin R (2009) Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2137:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk P, McEntarfer E, Moffitt R (2008) Trends in the transitory variance of male earnings in the US, 1991–2003: Preliminary Evidence from LEHD data. Boston College WP, 696

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

  • Holme P, Kim BJ, Yoon CN, Han SK (2002) Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Phys Rev E 65:056109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Gao J, Buldyrev SV et al (2011) Robustness of interdependent networks under targeted attack. Phys Rev E 83:065101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenelius E, Petersen T, Mattsson L-G (2006) Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 40:537–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B (2007) A topological pattern of urban street networks: universality and peculiarity. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl 384:647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karduni A, Kermanshah A, Derrible S (2016) A protocol to convert spatial polyline data to network formats and applications to world urban road networks. Sci Data. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.46

  • Kermanshah A, Derrible S (2016) A geographical and multi-criteria vulnerability assessment of transportation networks against extreme earthquakes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermanshah A, Karduni A, Peiravian F, Derrible S (2014) Impact analysis of extreme events on flows in spatial networks. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on Big Data. IEEE, pp 29–34

  • Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J et al (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koç Y, Warnier M, Van Mieghem P et al (2014) The impact of the topology on cascading failures in a power grid model. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl 402:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Carr R, Faulon J-L (2006) Random removal of edges from scale free graphs. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl 371:870–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AT, Matisziw TC, Grubesic TH (2008) A methodological overview of network vulnerability analysis. Growth Change 39:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peiravian F, Kermanshah A, Derrible S (2014) Spatial data analysis of complex urban systems. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE, pp 54–59

  • Perrings C (1998) Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems. Environ Resour Econ 11:503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DM, Novak DC, Aultman-Hall L, Guo F (2006) Network robustness index: a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks. J Transp Geogr 14:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez P, Anderson W, Mahal V, Lakshmanan T (2005) Impacts of flooding and climate change on urban transportation: a systemwide performance assessment of the Boston Metro Area. Transp Res Part Transp Environ 10:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable fragility. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MA (2008) Critical transport infrastructure in Urban Areas: impacts of traffic incidents assessed using accessibility-based network vulnerability analysis. Growth Change 39:593–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2012) How to make cities more resilient—a handbook for mayors and local government leaders. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2013) TIGER products. http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger.html. Accessed 25 May 2015

  • US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies (2015) US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Publications and Reports Page. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/. Accessed 24 Sep 2015

  • Wang X, Pournaras E, Kooij RE, Van Mieghem P (2014) Improving robustness of complex networks via the effective graph resistance. Eur Phys J B 87:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ (2002) A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5766–5771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (2015) Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering

  • Zhang G-Q, Wang D, Li G-J (2007) Enhancing the transmission efficiency by edge deletion in scale-free networks. Phys Rev E 76:017101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor Street (M/C 246), Chicago, IL, 60607-7023, USA

    Amirhassan Kermanshah & Sybil Derrible

Authors
  1. Amirhassan Kermanshah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sybil Derrible
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhassan Kermanshah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kermanshah, A., Derrible, S. Robustness of road systems to extreme flooding: using elements of GIS, travel demand, and network science. Nat Hazards 86, 151–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2678-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2678-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation