Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences 1/2010

01.03.2010

The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe

verfasst von: Reinhard Steurer

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) aims to better integrate social and environmental concerns into business routines on a voluntary basis. The present article is concerned with the political side of the management approach. By systematically characterising the public policies on CSR throughout Europe, it first complements the existing, often unsystematic, accounts of how governments address CSR (mostly provided in management journals). Second, it also brings the issue closer to political science. After explaining why governments show interest in CSR, the article introduces CSR as a voluntary contribution to sustainable development. It then develops a typology of CSR policies that distinguishes five types of policy instruments (legal, economic, informational, partnering and hybrid) and four thematic fields of action (raise awareness, improve transparency, foster socially responsible investment and lead by example). Based on this systematic description of CSR policies, the article explores what CSR and the respective public policies imply for business–government relations as well as the changing patterns of regulation. It concludes that CSR started out as a neo-liberal concept that helped to downscale government regulations, but that it has in turn matured into a more progressive approach of societal co-regulation in recent years. Regarding the effectiveness and the opportunity costs of this new pattern of governance, the article emphasises that the respective assessment gaps should be filled by case study research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The URL of the former CSR website was http://​www.​csr.​gov.​uk/​policy.​shtml. Similar statements can be found on the contemporary CSR website of the UK government at http://​www.​berr.​gov.​uk/​whatwedo/​sectors/​sustainability/​what/​CR/​page46727.​html).
 
2
Albareda et al. (2007), e.g. describe CSR policies not by categorising policy instruments and themes but rather by relating all sorts of government activities to target groups from the government, civil society and business domain of society. The activities listed under the domain of ‘administration/governments’ are, e.g. (i) participation in international events, (ii) transfer of international debate on CSR to the national and local context, (iii) fostering international instruments and agreements, (iv) external policy, trade and development co-operation policy. Obviously, these categories do not explain which policy instruments that governments actually use to promote CSR, and many of the activities (such as the transfer of the international debate on CSR to the national and local context) reach well beyond the domain that they are related to, in turn questioning the fundamentals of the typology altogether.
 
3
The stocktaking of public policies on three of the four fields of action that were identified here was conducted on behalf of the Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (DG Employment) between 2006 and 2008 through telephone surveys with public administrators working on CSR. The results were presented to, and discussed with, the EU High Level Group on CSR (a group of Member State representatives responsible for CSR in their country, chaired by DG Employment) at several occasions. All of the presentations and study reports can be accessed at http://​www.​sustainability.​eu/​csr-policies. For a summary report, see Steurer et al. (2008a).
 
4
The analyses of the themes of the CSR policy field were guided by three rules. First, the typology should distinguish as few themes as possible to remain lucid, and as many as necessary to be adequately differentiated. Second, themes (or contents) and instruments (or tools to achieve the contents, including partnering and hybrid ones) must not be mixed. Third, except for the basic distinction of policy themes and instruments, the characterisation of CSR policies must not apply a particular concept or logic, such as the relational state perspective (Albareda et al. 2006, 2007), which would in turn filter or distort the empirical stock-taking.
 
5
If not stated otherwise, the following paragraphs are based on Berger et al. (2007)
 
6
If not stated otherwise, the following paragraphs are based on Steurer et al. (2008a, b).
 
7
If not stated otherwise, the following paragraphs are based on Steurer et al. (2007).
 
10
I owe this thought (and its wording) to one of the three reviewers of ‘Policy Sciences’.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Albareda, L., et al. (2006). The government’s role in promoting corporate responsibility: A comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 386–400.CrossRef Albareda, L., et al. (2006). The government’s role in promoting corporate responsibility: A comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 386–400.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses, in: business ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 17, 347–363. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses, in: business ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 17, 347–363.
Zurück zum Zitat Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9514-1.CrossRef Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407. doi:10.​1007/​s10551-007-9514-1.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barth, R., Wolff, F., & Schmitt, K. (2007). CSR between rhetoric and reality: Analysing the contribution of CSR to the achievement of EU policy goals. Ökologisch Wirtschaften, 4, 30–34. Barth, R., Wolff, F., & Schmitt, K. (2007). CSR between rhetoric and reality: Analysing the contribution of CSR to the achievement of EU policy goals. Ökologisch Wirtschaften, 4, 30–34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bemelmans-Videc, M., Rist, R., & Vedung, E. (1997). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New York: Transaction Publishers. Bemelmans-Videc, M., Rist, R., & Vedung, E. (1997). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New York: Transaction Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003a). Comparative governance: Prospects and lessons. Public Administration, 81(1), 191–210.CrossRef Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003a). Comparative governance: Prospects and lessons. Public Administration, 81(1), 191–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003b). Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1–17.CrossRef Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003b). Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clarkson, M. B. E. (1998). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. In: M. B. E. Clarkson (Ed.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 243–273). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; also in: Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 92–117. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1998). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. In: M. B. E. Clarkson (Ed.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 243–273). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; also in: Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 92–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00274.CrossRef Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140. doi:10.​1111/​1540-6210.​00274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Croci, E. (Ed.). (2008). The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements: Design, implementation and evaluation issues. Berlin: Springer. Croci, E. (Ed.). (2008). The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements: Design, implementation and evaluation issues. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Cuesta, G. M., & Martinez, V. C. (2004). Fostering corporate social responsibility through public initiative: From the EU to the Spanish case. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 275–293.CrossRef de la Cuesta, G. M., & Martinez, V. C. (2004). Fostering corporate social responsibility through public initiative: From the EU to the Spanish case. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 275–293.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141. doi:10.1002/bse.323.CrossRef Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141. doi:10.​1002/​bse.​323.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 122–126. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 122–126.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamble, A. (2000). Economic governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 110–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gamble, A. (2000). Economic governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 110–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington: Brookings Institution. Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington: Brookings Institution.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson, D. (2001a). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs. Henderson, D. (2001a). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson, D. (2001b). The case against ‘corporate social responsibility’. Policy, 17(2), 28–32. Henderson, D. (2001b). The case against ‘corporate social responsibility’. Policy, 17(2), 28–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Holgaard, J. E., & Jørgensen, T. H. (2005). A decade of mandatory environmental reporting in Denmark. European Environment, 15(6), 362–373.CrossRef Holgaard, J. E., & Jørgensen, T. H. (2005). A decade of mandatory environmental reporting in Denmark. European Environment, 15(6), 362–373.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.CrossRef Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. doi:10.2307/258852.CrossRef Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. doi:10.​2307/​258852.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., Zito, A. R., & Brückner, L. (2003). European governance and the transfer of‚ ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union. Public Administration, 81(3), 555–574. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00361.CrossRef Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., Zito, A. R., & Brückner, L. (2003). European governance and the transfer of‚ ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union. Public Administration, 81(3), 555–574. doi:10.​1111/​1467-9299.​00361.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph, E. (2002). Promoting corporate social responsibility: Is marked-based regulation sufficient? New Economy, 9/2, 96–101.CrossRef Joseph, E. (2002). Promoting corporate social responsibility: Is marked-based regulation sufficient? New Economy, 9/2, 96–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance, Governance, 15(1), 41–63.CrossRef Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance, Governance, 15(1), 41–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A., & Steurer, R. (2008). When business associations and a Federal Ministry jointly consult civil society: A CSR policy case study on the development of the CSR Austria guiding vision. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 270–280.CrossRef Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A., & Steurer, R. (2008). When business associations and a Federal Ministry jointly consult civil society: A CSR policy case study on the development of the CSR Austria guiding vision. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 270–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance. London: Sage. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Liston-Heyes, C., & Ceton, G. C. (2007). Corporate social performance and politics. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Spring, 95–108. Liston-Heyes, C., & Ceton, G. C. (2007). Corporate social performance and politics. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Spring, 95–108.
Zurück zum Zitat Lozano, J. M., Albareda, L., & Ysa, T. (2008). Governments and corporate social responsibility: Public policies beyond regulation and voluntary compliance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Lozano, J. M., Albareda, L., & Ysa, T. (2008). Governments and corporate social responsibility: Public policies beyond regulation and voluntary compliance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathis, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and public policy-making: Perspectives, instruments and consequences. Twente: University of Twente. Mathis, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and public policy-making: Perspectives, instruments and consequences. Twente: University of Twente.
Zurück zum Zitat McCrudden, C. (2007). Buying social justice: Equality, procurement, and legal change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McCrudden, C. (2007). Buying social justice: Equality, procurement, and legal change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398.CrossRef McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. doi:10.​2307/​259398.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The role and potential of stakeholders in hollow participation: Conventional stakeholder theory and institutional alternatives. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 183–202. doi:10.1111/1467-8594.00160.CrossRef Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The role and potential of stakeholders in hollow participation: Conventional stakeholder theory and institutional alternatives. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 183–202. doi:10.​1111/​1467-8594.​00160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5, 159–174.CrossRef Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5, 159–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., et al. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 369–385.CrossRef Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., et al. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 369–385.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R. K., et al. (1998). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. In M. B. E. Clarkson, et al. (Eds.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 275–303). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Mitchell, R. K., et al. (1998). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. In M. B. E. Clarkson, et al. (Eds.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 275–303). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mol, A. P. J., Lauber, V., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.). (2000). The voluntary approach to environmental policy: Joint environmental policy-making in Europe: Joint environmental approach to environmental policy-making in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mol, A. P. J., Lauber, V., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.). (2000). The voluntary approach to environmental policy: Joint environmental policy-making in Europe: Joint environmental approach to environmental policy-making in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon, J. (2005). An explicit model of business-society relations. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 51–66). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Moon, J. (2005). An explicit model of business-society relations. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 51–66). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 296–306.CrossRef Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 296–306.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility, government and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility, government and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat OECD. (2008). Overview of selected initiatives and instruments relevant to corporate social responsibility. OECD-ILO Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility, Paris. OECD. (2008). Overview of selected initiatives and instruments relevant to corporate social responsibility. OECD-ILO Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility, Paris.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasche, A., et al. (2008). Corporations as political actors—a report on the First Swiss Master Class in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 151. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9418-0.CrossRef Rasche, A., et al. (2008). Corporations as political actors—a report on the First Swiss Master Class in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 151. doi:10.​1007/​s10551-007-9418-0.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin, A. (2008). Political views and corporate decision making. The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility, 43, 337–360. Rubin, A. (2008). Political views and corporate decision making. The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility, 43, 337–360.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmiedeknecht, M., & Wieland, J. (2007). ISO 26000 as a network discourse. In J. Wieland (Ed.), Governanceethik und Diskursethik—ein zwangloser Diskurs. Marburg: Metropolis. Schmiedeknecht, M., & Wieland, J. (2007). ISO 26000 as a network discourse. In J. Wieland (Ed.), Governanceethik und Diskursethik—ein zwangloser Diskurs. Marburg: Metropolis.
Zurück zum Zitat Scholtens, B., Cerin, P., et al. (2008). Sustainable development and socially responsible finance and investing. Sustainable Development, 16(3), 137–140CrossRef Scholtens, B., Cerin, P., et al. (2008). Sustainable development and socially responsible finance and investing. Sustainable Development, 16(3), 137–140CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steurer, R. (forthcoming). Soft instruments, few networks: How ‘new governance’ materialises in public policies on CSR across Europe. Steurer, R. (forthcoming). Soft instruments, few networks: How ‘new governance’ materialises in public policies on CSR across Europe.
Zurück zum Zitat Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0.CrossRef Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281. doi:10.​1007/​s10551-005-7054-0.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steurer, R., & Martinuzzi, A. (Eds.) (2007). Sustainable development strategies in Europe: Taking stock 20 years after the Brundtland Report. European Environment Special Issue, 17(3), 147–214. Steurer, R., & Martinuzzi, A. (Eds.) (2007). Sustainable development strategies in Europe: Taking stock 20 years after the Brundtland Report. European Environment Special Issue, 17(3), 147–214.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchell, J. (Eds.). (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks: The coordination of social life. London: Sage. Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchell, J. (Eds.). (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks: The coordination of social life. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat van Asselt, H., van der Grijp, N., & Oosterhuis, F. (2006). Greener public purchasing: opportunities for climate-friendly government procurement under WTO and EU rules. Climate Policy, 6, 217--229.CrossRef van Asselt, H., van der Grijp, N., & Oosterhuis, F. (2006). Greener public purchasing: opportunities for climate-friendly government procurement under WTO and EU rules. Climate Policy, 6, 217--229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Werder, A., Talaulicar, T., & Kolat, G. L. (2005). Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: An empirical analysis of the compliance statements by German listed companies. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 178–187.CrossRef von Werder, A., Talaulicar, T., & Kolat, G. L. (2005). Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: An empirical analysis of the compliance statements by German listed companies. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 178–187.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ward, H. (2004). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: Taking stock. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Ward, H. (2004). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: Taking stock. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadek, S. (2001). Third generation corporate citizenship: Public policy and business in society. London: AccountAbility. Zadek, S. (2001). Third generation corporate citizenship: Public policy and business in society. London: AccountAbility.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December, 125–132. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December, 125–132.
Metadaten
Titel
The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe
verfasst von
Reinhard Steurer
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2010
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9084-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Policy Sciences 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe