Abstract
This paper seeks to establish the role of absorptive capacity in technology transfer from acquisition FDI in U.K. manufacturing. It finds that the rate of productivity change following a foreign take-over is higher the higher the pre-acquisition productivity level of the acquired firm, indicating the importance of absorptive capacity. However, beyond some critical level of initial productivity, the rate of technology transfer due to foreign acquisition starts to decline. It seems that U.K. acquisition targets that had been operating nearer the domestic technology frontier have less to gain from their association with foreign multinationals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T. and C. Hsiao (1982) “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 18:67–82.
Arellano, M and S. Bond (1991) “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economics Studies 58:277–297.
Baltagi, B.H. (1995) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons Limited.
Blomström, M and A. Kokko (1998) “Multinational Corporations and Spillovers.” Journal of Economic Surveys 12:247–277.
Blundell, R. and M. Costa Dias (2000) “Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data.” Fiscal Studies 21:427–468.
Caves, R.E. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1989) “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.” Economic Journal 99:569–596.
Conyon, M., S. Girma, S. Thompson and P. Wright (2002) “The Impact of Foreign Acquisition on Wages and Productivity in the U.K.” Journal of Industrial Economics L:85–102.
Dunning, J (1977) “Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: A Search for an Eclectic Approach.” In B. Ohlin, P.O. Hesselborn and P.M. Wijkman (eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity. London: Macmillan, pp. 935–418.
Findlay, R. (1978) “Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 92:1–16.
Gomes, L. and K. Ramaswamy (1999) “An Empirical Examination of the form of the Relationship Between Multinationality and Performance.” Journal of International Business Studies 30:173–188.
Görg, Holger and D. Greenaway (2004) “Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?” World Bank Research Observer 19:171–197.
Görg, H. and E. Strobl (2001) “Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta-Analysis.” Economic Journal 111:F723–F739.
Harris, R. and C. Robinson (2002) “The Effect of Foreign Acquisitions on Total Factor Productivity: Plant-Level Evidence from U.K. Manufacturing, 1987–1992.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 84:562–568.
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. and Todd, P. (1997) “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64:605–654.
Kogut, B. (1985) “Designing Global Strategies: Profiting from Operational Flexibility.” Sloan Management Review 26:27–38.
Lapan, H. and P. Bardhan (1973) “Localised Technical Progress and the Transfer of Technology and Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Theory 6:585–595.
Nickell, S. (1996) “Competition and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Political Economy 104:724–746.
Rosenbaum, P. and D.B. Rubin (1983) “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70:41–55.
Sianesi, Barbara (2001) “Implementing Propensity Score Matching Estimators with Stata.” Program available at http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/usug2001/psmatch.pdf
Wang, J.-Y. and M. Blomström (1992) “Foreign Investment and Technological Transfer: A Simple Model.” European Economic Review 36:137–155.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girma, S. Technology Transfer from Acquisition FDI and the Absorptive Capacity of Domestic Firms: An Empirical Investigation. Open Econ Rev 16, 175–187 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-005-5874-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-005-5874-2