Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A cross-cultural comparative study of teacher effectiveness: Analyses of award-winning teachers in the United States and China

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a richer understanding of teacher effectiveness through cross-cultural analyses of the practices and beliefs of selected China and US teachers who have received national awards for their teaching. This study was based upon a phenomenological design that used semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and artifacts for data generation/collection. Sixteen China teachers and 16 US teachers participated in this study. This study revealed similarities and differences between US teachers and China teachers in their patterns of instructional practices and professional thinking. The major similarities found between them were (a) using a variety of instructional activities which spanned across different cognitive levels, (b) being opportunistic planners to maximize meaningful student learning, (c) having high student engagement, (d) presenting effective classroom management skills, and (e) maintaining a learning environment that was conducive to optimal learning. Primary differences between US and China teachers’ classrooms included the types of instructional activities used and their beliefs and practices in the areas of (a) instructional planning, (b) differentiation, (c) assessment, (d) classroom management, (e) relationships with students and parents, and (f) professional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. J. (2002). Dichotomous pedagogies and the promise of comparative research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, 3 April.

  • Algozzine, R., & Engelmann, S. (1986). In search of excellence: Instruction that works in special education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 52, 487–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, S., Kulm, G., Wu, Z., Ma, F., & Wang, L. (2002). The impact of cultural differences on middle school mathematics teachers’ beliefs in the U.S. and China. In: Pre-conference Proceedings (Supplement) of the ICMI Comparative Study Conference, 20th–25th October, 2002, Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). Taxonomy of learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y. (2000). Practices and characteristics of highly effective teachers. Educational Research and Experiment, 4, 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman–Loxley Effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, J. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning Culture. In D. Watkins & J. Briggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual (pp. 45–67). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Cassady, J. C., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., Cross, T. L., Dixon, F. A., & Pierce, R. L. (2004). The Differentiated Classroom Observation Scale. Roeper Review, 26(3), 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K., & Rao, N. (2010). The paradoxes revisited: The Chinese learner in changing educational contexts. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 315–349). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre/Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed., pp. 203–242). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. B. (2001). Parents’ attitudes and expectations regarding science education: Comparisons among American, Chinese-American, and Chinese families. Adolescence, 36, 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, V. M. Y. (2004). Progress from traditional to creativity education in Chinese societies. In Lau, S., Hui, A. H. H., Ng, G. Y. C. (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west (pp. 137–168). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.

  • Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. F. (2009). National income, income inequality, and the importance of schools: A hierarchical cross-national comparison. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 626–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, S., Muncy, D. E., & You, S. (2005). Standards-based evaluation and teacher career satisfaction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2001). Large classes in China: “Good” teachers and interaction. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 115–134). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M., & Waston, K. (2003). Comparative and international research in education: Globalization, context, and difference. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y., & Wang, S. (2005). Conceptualizing and constructing effective instruction. Curriculum and Instruction: Elementary and Secondary Education, 182, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Building a system for powerful teaching and learning. In. B. Wehling and C. Schneider (Eds), Building a 21st century education system (pp. 65–74). Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R., Caplan, R., Costanza, D., Brubaker, T., Cloud, D., Harris, N., et al. (1999). New estimates of working time for elementary school teachers. Monthly Labor Review, 122(4), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R., & Burney, D. (1999). School variation and systemic instructional component in community school district #2, New York City. University of Pennsylvania: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., & Gurcharn, K. (2000). The influence of textbooks on teaching strategies: An empirical study. Midwestern Educational Researcher, 13(4), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., & Gopinathan, S. (2009). Teachers and teaching in Eastern and Western schools: A critical review of cross-cultural comparative studies. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 557–572). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., Hooghart, A., Song, J., & Choi, J. (2003). Roles in context—Examine staffrooms as sites for teacher learning in three cultures: China, Japan, and South Korea. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1995). Cracking open the IQ box. In S. Fraser (Ed.), The bell curve war: Race, intelligence, and the future of America (pp. 23–35). New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses on achievement. New York: Routledge.

  • Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (1991). Structure and semantic differential placement of specific causes: Academic causal attributions by Chinese students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries. Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., & Leung, F. K. S. (2004). Cracking the paradox of the Chinese learners—Looking into the mathematics classrooms in Hong Kong and Shanghai. In L. Fan, N. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2004). Models of teaching (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K., & Lee, J. (2008). The changing role of schools in Asian societies: Schools for the knowledge society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, E., & Liut, V. (2004). Effectiveness of explicit and constructivist mathematics instruction for low achieving students in the Netherlands. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1999). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Akar, H., Guitierrez, C., Jenkins-Gunn, E., & Rosebrock, K. (2005). Classroom management. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 327–357). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. K. S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 297–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2003). US and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Shimizu, Y. (2009). Exemplary mathematics instruction and its development in selected education systems in East Asia. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(3), 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2006). School effectiveness research in China. Unpublished dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

  • Luiselli, J. K., Putnam, R. F., & Sunderland, M. (2002). Longitudinal evaluation of behavior support intervention in a public middle school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangin, M. M. (2005). Distributed leadership and the culture of schools: Teacher leaders’ strategies for gaining access to classrooms. Journal of School Leadership, 15, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J., Fisher, J., & Hoover, G. (2003). The key elements of classroom management: Managing time and space, student behavior, and instructional strategies. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendro, R. L., Jordan, H. R., Gomez, E., Anderson, M. C., & Bembry, K. L. (1998, April). Longitudinal teacher effects on student achievement and their relation to school and project evaluation. Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2003). Student background and teacher effects on achievement and attainment in Mathematics: A longitudinal study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong performers and successful reformers in education. doi: 10.1287/9789264096660-en.

  • Paine, L. W. (1990). The teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke, C. S., Lane, S., & Stone, C. A. (2006). Impact of a state performance assessment program in reading and writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(3), 239–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preus, B. (2007). Educational trends in China and the United States: Proverbial pendulum or potential for balance? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(5), 262–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Stevens. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (2nd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D., & Feldman, S. (1991). The influence of perceived family and personal factors on self-reported school performance of Chinese and Western high school students. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salili, F., & Hau, K. T. (1994). The effect of teachers’ evaluative feedback on Chinese students’ perception of ability: A cultural and situational analysis. Educational Studies, 20(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. C. (2006). Institutionalizing educational ideologies: Curriculum reform and the transformation of teaching practice in rural China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

  • Schwerdt, G., Wuppemann, A. C. (2009). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. CESifo Working Paper No. 2634. Retrieved from http://www.eale.nl/Conference2009/PapersB/Schwerdt_Wuppermann_452.pdf.

  • Schwille, J., Dembele, M., & Schubert, J. (2007). Global perspectives on teacher learning: Improving policy and practice. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszenthmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspectives of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., & Zha, Z. (2000). Psychological research on the education of gifted and talented children in China. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 757–764). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. J., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J., & Stevenson, H. W. (1991). How Asian teaches polish each other to perfection. American Educator, 15(1), 12–21. 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H. (2010). Teacher effectiveness = student achievement: What the research says. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. (2004). A study on teacher instructional effectiveness. Unpublished dissertation, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

  • Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2/3), 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, B., & DeFranco, C. (2008). Elementary students’ retention of environmental science knowledge: Connected science instruction versus direct instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Ontario, Canada: The State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, The College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA

    Leslie W. Grant, James H. Stronge & Xianxuan Xu

Authors
  1. Leslie W. Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James H. Stronge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianxuan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie W. Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, L.W., Stronge, J.H. & Xu, X. A cross-cultural comparative study of teacher effectiveness: Analyses of award-winning teachers in the United States and China. Educ Asse Eval Acc 25, 251–276 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9170-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9170-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation