Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response of soil properties and maize yield to simulated erosion by artificial topsoil removal

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was aimed at identifying the soil properties responsible for maize yield decline on eroded soils and at quantifying their relationship with yield. Topsoil was artificially removed to incremental depths of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm to simulate various degrees of erosion. Maize growth and yield were monitored on the plots and soil physical and chemical properties were determined after two years (4 seasons) of cultivation. Soil pH was significantly higher on the control plot and decreased with increased depth of topsoil removal. Bulk density (BD) increased with depth of topsoil removal from a mean value of 1.38 g cm−3 under control to 1.55 g cm−3 at 20 cm depth of removal, while cone index of penetrometer resistance (CI) correspondingly increased from 1.09 g cm−2 to 1.37 g cm−2. Maize yield significantly decreased in the first year from 3.2 t ha−1 on the control plot to 0.12 t ha−1 where 20 cm of topsoil was removed and correspondingly from 1.85 to 0.09 t ha−1 in the second year of cropping. Maize yield decreased exponentially with increase in depth of topsoil removal (r 2=0.99, P<0.01) with an average of 55% yield loss on the removal of just 5 cm topsoil. Soil organic carbon (SOC), BD, CI, field capacity (FC), pH and exchangeable Mg2+ were significantly correlated to maize yield parameters. However, factor analysis showed that the combination of SOC and exchangeable Mg2+ with soil physical properties (BD, FC, CI and depth of topsoil removal) explained 99% of variation in maize grain yield. The need for conservation farm practices is recommended on the soil to prevent soil degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • JA Adepteu RB Corey (1977) ArticleTitleChanges in N and P availability and from P fractions in Iwo soil from Nigeria under intensive cultivation Plant Soil 46 309–316 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00010087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PO Aina E Egolum (1980) ArticleTitleThe effect of cattle feedlot manure and inorganic fertilizer on the improvement of subsoil productivity Soil Sci 129 212–217 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXktVKrt7w%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FJ Arriaga B Lowery (2003) ArticleTitleCorn production on an eroded soil: effects of total rainfall and soil water storage Soil Till Res 71 87–93 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MM Bakker G Govers MDA Rounsvell (2004) ArticleTitleThe crop productivity-erosion relationship: analysis based on experimental work Catena 57 55–76 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.catena.2003.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AR Bathelder JN Jones (1972) ArticleTitleSoil management factors and growth of Zea mays L. on topsoil and exposed subsoil Agron J 64 648–652 Occurrence Handle10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400050030x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A Bationo F Lompo S Koala (1998) ArticleTitleResearch on nutrient flow and balances in west Africa: state-of-art Agric Ecosyst Environ 71 19–35 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXktFWgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00129-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GJ Bouyocous (1962) ArticleTitleHydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils Agron J 27 738–741 Occurrence Handle10.2134/agronj1935.00021962002700090007x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RB Daniels JW Gilliam DK Cassel LA Nelson (1985) ArticleTitleSoil erosion class and landscape position in the North Carolina Piedmont Soil Sci Soc Am J 49 991–995 Occurrence Handle10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040040x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daddow RL, Warrington GE (1983) Growth limiting soil bulk densities as influenced by soil texture. Watershed Systems development Group Report No. WSDG-TN-00005. USDA For. Serv. Fort Collins, CO

  • P Fahnestock R Lal GF Hall (1996) ArticleTitleLand use and erosional effects on two Ohio Alfisols: II Crop yields J Sust Agric 7 85–100 Occurrence Handle10.1300/J064v07n02_09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TE Fenton M Kazeni MA Lauterbach-Barrett (2005) ArticleTitleErosional impact on organic matter content and productivity of selected Iowa soils Soil Till Res 81 163–171 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.still.2004.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T Gaiser1 I Barros Particlede FM Lange JR Williams (2004) ArticleTitleWater use efficiency of a maize/cowpea intercrop on a highly acidic tropical soil as affected by liming and fertilizer application Soil Plant 263 165–171 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047733.98854.9f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OE Hays CE Bay HH Hull (1948) ArticleTitleIncreasing production in an eroded loess-derived soil J Am Soc Agron 41 1061–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • NR Hulugalle (1986) Effect of topsoil removal on soil physical properties and and grain yield of maize in the Sudan Savannah of Burkina Faso Mimeo. IITA Ibadan, Nigeria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurni H (1985) Erosion-productivity conservation systems in Ethiopia. Soil Conservation Research Project (SCRP). In: Pla Sentis I (ed) Soil conservation and productivity. Proceedings IV International Conference on Soil Conservation, Maracay, Venezuela. Vol 1 &2: 654–674

  • R Lal (1981a) ArticleTitleSoil erosion problems on Alfisols in Western Nigeria. VI. Effects of erosion on experimental plots Geoderma 25 215–230 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0016-7061(81)90037-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Lal (1981b) Deforestation of tropical rainforest and hydrological problems R Lal EW Russel (Eds) Tropical agricultural hydrology J. Wiley & Sons Chichester, U.K 131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • R Lal (1987) ArticleTitleResponse of maize and cassava to removal of surface soil from an alfisol in Nigeria Int J Trop Agric 5 77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • R Lal (1995) ArticleTitleErosion-crop productivity relationship for soils of Africa Soil Sci Soc Am J 59 661–667 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXlvFyqsrk%3D Occurrence Handle10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900030004x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GW Langdale HP Denton AW White JW Gilliam WW Frye (1985) Effects of soil erosion on soil productivity of southern soils RF Follet AB Stewart (Eds) Soil erosion and crop productivity ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Madison, WI 251–270

    Google Scholar 

  • FJ Larney RC Izuarralde HH Janzen BM Olson ED Solberg CW Lindwal M Nyborg (1995) ArticleTitleSoil erosion-crop productivity relationships for six Alberta soils J Soil Water Conserv 50 87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • FJ Larney BM Olson HH Janzen CW Lindwall (2000) ArticleTitleEarly impact of topsoil removal and soil amendments on crop productivity Agron J 92 948–956 Occurrence Handle10.2134/agronj2000.925948x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JSC Mbagwu (1988) ArticleTitlePhysico-chemical properties of and productivity of an Ultisol in Nigeria as affected by long-term erosion Pedology 38 137–154 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXhtFeltr8%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • JSC Mbagwu R Lal TW Scott (1984) ArticleTitleEffects of desurfacing of Alfisols and Ultisols in Southern Nigeria: I. Crop performance Soil Sci Soc Am J 48 828–833 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXlvFSnsLw%3D Occurrence Handle10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040026x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel TA, Hajek BF (1985) Soil erosion effects on crop productivity and soil properties. In: Erosion and soil productivity. Publ. 8-85. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, pp 45–58

  • LN Mielke JS Schepers (1986) ArticleTitlePlant response to topsoil thickness on an eroded loess soil J Soil W Conserv 41 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Soil Erosion-Soil Productivity Research Planning Committee (1981) ArticleTitleSoil erosion effects on soil productivity: a research perspective J. Soil Water Conserv 36 82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon and organic matter. In: Bartels JM (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3, Chemical methods, 3rd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, Book series no. 5, pp 961–1010

  • DJ Oyedele PO Aina (1998) ArticleTitleA study of soil factors in relation to erosion and yield of maize on a Nigerian soil Soil Till Res 48 115–125 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00110-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FJ Pierce WE Larson RH Dowdy WAP Graham (1983) ArticleTitleProductivity of soils: assessing long-term changes due to erosion J Soil Water Conserv 38 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm S (1978) Land development in the humid tropics. Proc. Int. Symp. Agra Mechani-Sierung der Dig. Germany Agency for Technical Development, Frankfurt

  • Rhoades JD (1982) Cation exchange capacity. In Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9:149–157

  • E Roose B Brthes (2001) ArticleTitleOrganic matter management for soil conservation and productivity restoration in Africa: a contribution from Francophone research Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 61 159–170 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013349731671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PA Sanchez (1990) Deforestation reduction initiative: an imperative for word sustainability in the twenty century AE Bouwman (Eds) Soil and Greenhouse effect Wiley NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1985) SAS user’s guide: Statistics version 5th edn. SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA

  • Soil Survey Staff (1992) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 5th edn. SMSS Technical Monograph, vol. 19. Pocahentas Press Blacksburg, Virginia

  • KR Vegh T Szundy K Rajkai T Tischner (1998) ArticleTitleRoots, phosphorus uptake and water use efficiency of maize genotypes Acta Agron Hungarica 46 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • JR Williams CA Jones PT Dykes (1984) ArticleTitleA modelling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity Trans ASAE 27 129–144

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Oyedele.

Additional information

Section Editor: L. Wade

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oyedele, D.J., Aina, P.O. Response of soil properties and maize yield to simulated erosion by artificial topsoil removal. Plant Soil 284, 375–384 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-0041-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-0041-0

Keywords

Navigation