Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Liming to remediate Ni contaminated soils with diverse properties and a wide range of Ni concentration

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historic emissions from a Ni refinery at Port Colborne, Ontario, caused Ni contamination of regional soils and raised concerns about potential Ni phytotoxicity. Previous tests revealed that if these soils were made alkaline and fertilized with Mn and other common nutrients as needed to maintain fertility of such alkaline soils, full remediation (prevention of Ni phytotoxicity) would be obtained. This experiment was conducted to test this method of remediation on diverse soils from Port Colborne, and to evaluate chemical extraction tests which would be predictive of plant uptake and potential for Ni phytotoxicity in Ni-contaminated soils. Ten soils with varied levels of Ni contamination and varied soil properties were amended with limestone or nitric acid to raise or lower pH so that a wide pH range could be examined for the soils. For lower Ni organic and mineral soils near the Ontario remediation limit (200 mg/kg), neither crop suffered Ni phytotoxicity at any pH tested. Only when more highly contaminated soils were strongly acidic did Ni phytotoxicity occur. Phytotoxic soils were fully remediated by making soils alkaline even for these Ni-sensitive crop species. Only the most contaminated organic soil remained slightly toxic – but this soil was remarkably contaminated (over 1.1% of Ni). The Sr nitrate extraction method was much more effective in predicting plant Ni concentrations than the DTPA method. This test provides an inexpensive soil extraction result highly predictive of potential for Ni phytotoxicity across soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson AJ, Mayer DR, Mayer FK (1973) Heavy metals toxicities: levels of nickel, cobalt and chromium in the soil and plants associated with visual symptoms and variation in growth of an oat crop. Aust J Agric Res 24:557–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CS, Johnston RW (1986) Manganese in soybean and small grain production. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Basta NT, Ryan JA, Chaney, RL (2005) Trace element chemistry in residual-treated soil: Key concepts and metal bioavailability. J Environ Qual 34:49–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bisessar S (1989) Effects of lime on nickel uptake and toxicity in celery grown on muck soil contaminated by a nickel refinery. Sci Total Environ 84:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton J (1975) Liming effects on the toxicity to perennial ryegrass of a sewage sludge contaminated with zinc, nickel, copper and chromium. Environ Pollut 9:295–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brallier S, Harrison RB, Henry CL, Dongsen X (1996) Liming effects on availability of Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn in a soil amended with sewage sludge 16 years previously. Water Air Soil Pollut 86:195–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruemmer GW, Gerth J, Tiller KG (1988) Reaction kinetics of the adsorption and desorption of nickel, zinc, and cadmium by goethite. I. Adsorption and diffusion of metals. J Soil Sci 39:37–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers DB, Chaney RL, Conard BR, Garisto NC, Kukier U, Phillips HA, Fernandes S (1998) Risk assessment for nickel in soil, with a critical review of soil–nickel phytotoxicity. White Paper Report to Ontario Ministry of the Environment for Inco Ltd, pp 72

  • Chang AC, Granato TC, Page AL (1992) A methodology for establishing phytotoxicity criteria for chromium, copper, nickel and zinc in agricultural land application of municipal sewage sludges. J Environ Qual 21:521–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crooke WM, Knight AH (1955) The relationship between nickel-toxicity symptoms and the absorption of iron and nickel. Ann Appl Biol 43:454–464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crooke WM (1956) Effect of soil reaction on uptake of nickel from a serpentine soil. Soil Sci 81:269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R, Stonefield KI, Suda P, Potter JW (1982) Impact of nickel contamination on the production of vegetables on an organic soil, Ontario, Canada, 1980–1981. Sci Total Environ 26:41–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle size analysis. In: Klute A et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Schulz R, Marschner H (1995) Genotypic differences in uptake and distribution of cadmium and nickel in plants. Angew Bot 69:42–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haq AU, Bates TE, Soon YK (1980) Comparison of extractants for plant-available zinc, cadmium, nickel, and copper in contaminated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:772–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haq AU, Miller MH (1972) Prediction of available soil Zn, Cu, and Mn using chemical extractants. Agron J 64:779–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JG, Vergnano O (1952) Nickel toxicity in plants. Ann Appl Biol 39:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JG, Vergnano O (1953) Trace-element toxicities in oat plants. Ann Appl Biol 40:761–777

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukier U, Chaney RL (2000) Remediating Ni-phytotoxicity of contaminated quarry muck soil using limestone and hydrous iron oxide. Can J Soil Sci 80:581–593

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukier U, Chaney RL (2001) Amelioration of nickel phytotoxicity in muck and mineral soils. J Environ Qual 30:1949–1960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukier U, Chaney RL (2004) In situ remediation of Ni-phytotoxicity for different plant species. J Plant Nutr 27:465–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YM, Chaney RL, Siebielec G, Kershner BA (2000) Response of four turfgrass cultivars to limestone and biosolids compost amendments of a zinc and cadmium contaminated soil at Palmerton, PA. J Environ Qual 29:1440–1447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL (2001) Chemical equilibria in soils. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ, p 449

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loeppert RH, Inskeep WP (1996) Iron. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 649–650

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNicol RD, Beckett PHT (1985) Critical tissue concentrations of potentially toxic elements. Plant Soil 85:107–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madden MS (1988) Adapting the Sr(NO3)2 method for determining available cations to a routine soil testing procedure. M.Sc. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison

  • McIlveen WD, Negusanti JJ (1994) Nickel in the terrestrial environment. Sci Total Environ 148:109–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNear DH Jr, Chaney RL, Sparks DL (2007) The effects of soil type and chemical treatment on nickel speciation in refinery enriched soils: a multi-technique investigation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2190–2208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K, Kirkby EA (1982) Manganese. In: Principles of Plant Nutrition. 3rd edn, Chapter 14. International Potash Institute, Bern/Switzerland, pp 491–498

  • O’Connor GA (1988) Use and misuse of the DTPA test. J Environ Qual 17:715–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Environment (1989) Ontario Ministry of the Environment “upper limit of normal” contaminant guidelines for phytotoxicology samples. Phytotoxicology Section, Air Resources Branch, Technical Support Sections, NE and NW Regions. ARB_138-88-Phyto

  • Ontario Ministry of Environment (1996) Guidelines for use at contaminated sites in Ontario, June

  • Roth JA, Wallihan EF, Sharpless RG (1971) Uptake by oats and soybean of copper and nickel added to a peat soil. Soil Sci 112:338–342

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders JR, Adams TM (1987) The effects of pH and soil type on concentration of zinc, copper and nickel extracted by calcium chloride from sewage sludge-treated soils. Environ Pollut 43:219–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT™ User’s guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC

  • Sauerbeck DR, Hein A (1991) The nickel uptake and from different soils and its prediction by chemical extractions. Water Air Soil Pollut 57–58:861–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheckel KG, Sparks DL (2001) Dissolution kinetics of nickel surface precipitates on clay mineral and oxide surfaces. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:685–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siebielec G, Chaney RL (2006) Mn fertilizer requirement to prevent Mn deficiency when liming to remediate Ni-phytotoxic soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 37:163–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temple PJ, Bisessar S (1981) Uptake and toxicity of nickel and other metals in crops grown on soil contaminated by a nickel refinery. J Plant Nutr 3:473–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uren NC (1992) Forms, reactions, and availability of nickel in soils. Adv Agron 48:141–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1995) Test methods for evaluating soils and wastes, vol. IA: Laboratory manual physical/chemical methods. SW 846 3rd edn. US Government Pront. Office, Washington, DC

  • Weng LP, Temminghoff EJ, Van Riemsdijk WH (2001) Contribution of individual sorbents to the control of heavy metal activity in sandy soil. Environ Sci Technol 35:4436–4443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitby LM, Hutchinson TC (1974) Heavy-metal pollution in the Sudbury mining and smelting region of Canada, II. Soil toxicity tests. Environ Conserv 1:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by Viridian Resources LLC, Houston, TX, and Inco Ltd., Toronto, Canada. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Carrie Green for assistance with sample analysis by ICP; and Eric Brewer for advice and assistance with growing the crops in the greenhouse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100, Pulawy, Poland

    Grzegorz Siebielec

  2. Animal Manure & By-products Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA

    Rufus L. Chaney

  3. Department of Crop and Environmental Soil Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Urszula Kukier

Authors
  1. Grzegorz Siebielec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rufus L. Chaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Urszula Kukier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grzegorz Siebielec.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Juan Barcelo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siebielec, G., Chaney, R.L. & Kukier, U. Liming to remediate Ni contaminated soils with diverse properties and a wide range of Ni concentration. Plant Soil 299, 117–130 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9369-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9369-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation