nach oben

Political Behavior

Erschienen in:

01.12.2014 | Original Paper

The Determinants of US Public Opinion Towards Democracy Promotion

verfasst von: Dawn Brancati

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this paper, I evaluate two competing perspectives regarding what underlies the public’s support for democracy promotion—a democratic values-based perspective positing that the public’s support for democracy promotion is based on a principled desire to spread American values, beliefs, and ideologies to other countries, and a national interests-based perspective claiming that it is based on a rational desire of Americans to advance the US’ political and economic interests abroad. Using a survey experiment, I find that, in general, Americans are not driven by either democratic values or national interests to support democracy promotion even though they believe that democracy promotion is in the interests of both the recipient country and the United States. Only a subset of the population is motivated to support democracy promotion for the sake of democratic values. This subset of the population is driven by cosmopolitanism—that is, a sense of concern for the welfare of those living in other countries and a sense of moral responsibility to promote democracy abroad derived from the US’ position as a world leader, not national pride.

Nächster Artikel Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Woodrow Wilson: Address at Boston, Massachusetts, February 24, 1919. Available from The Woodrow Wilson Presidential Library and Museum.

The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations and the German Marshall Fund,Worldviews 2002, June 1–30, 2002.

Pew Research Center America’s Place in the World, December 2009. A 2005 poll by The Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and the CCFR found that only 27 % of those polled said “helping to bring a democratic form of government to other nations,” was “very important” and 19 % said that it was “not at all important”. See: PIPA/CCFR “Americans on Promoting Democracy,” September 2005.

Pew Center Research, “Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels”, June 17, 2013.

PIPA/CCFR“Americans on Promoting Democracy” September 2005.

German Marshall Fund, “Transatlantic Trends”, June 6–24, 2006.

Pew Research Center,“Public Wary of Military Intervention in Libya,” March 14, 2011.

Pew Research Center, “Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels,” June 17, 2013.

See: America’s Place in the World“; Worldviews 2002.

PIPA/CCFR “Americans on Promoting Democracy,” September 2005; Pew Research Center “Public Wary of Military Intervention in Libya,” March 14, 2011; Megan Thee-Brenan, “Poll Shows Isolationist Streak in Americans,” New York Times, April 30, 2013.

Examples: (Haiti): Gallup, September 23–25, 1994; (Kosovo): Gallup/CNN/USA Today Poll, March 30–31,1999; (Iraq): CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, March 22–23, 2003 and Libya (2011) Gallup, March 21, 2011. (Syria): Pew, June 12–16, 1993.

Woodrow T. Wilson. “U.S. Declaration of War with Germany,” April 2, 1917. See: http://firstworldwar.com. Date Accessed: September 13, 2011.

George W. Bush. “Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union,” January 28, 2003. See: The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/. Date Accessed: September 13, 2011.

Richard M. Nixon. Cambodian Incursion Address, Washington DC, April 30, 1970. See: The American Rhetoric, http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/richardnixoncambodia.html. Date Accessed: September 13, 2011.

William J. Clinton. “Address to the Nation on Haiti”, Washington, DC. September 15, 1994. See: The American Presidency Project http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ Date Accessed: September 13, 2011.

George W. Bush. Inaugural Address, Washington, DC, January 20, 2005. See: The American Presidency Project http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ Date Accessed: September 13, 2011.

Pew Global Attitudes Project: Spring 2007, June 27, 2007. Question 34: “And which comes closer to describing your view? The United States promotes democracy wherever it can, or the United States promotes democracy where it serves its interests.”

Democracy is defined here as countries scoring a five or above on the Polity II Index. See: Monty G. Marshall, Keith Jaggers, and Ted Robert Gurr. 2011. Polity IV Project: Dataset Users Manual. Center for Systemic Peace: Polity IV Project.

Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on Libya, National Defense University, Washington, D.C., March 28, 2011.

TAPS is administered by Knowledge Networks on behalf of Washington University in St. Louis. The American Panel Survey (TAPS). Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1027, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899. http://taps.wustl.edu/.

The number of participants in each of the experimental conditions was as follows: treatment 1 (recipient country benefit) = 392; treatment 2 (moral responsibility) = 384; treatment 3 (national interests) = 434; control = 392. See below for a description of the experimental conditions.

People’s responses to these questions were not significantly different across experimental conditions according to χ² tests.

A chi-square test is a goodness-of-fit test, which compares observed frequency distributions with the theoretical or expected frequency distribution to determine whether the deviations between the observed and the expected counts are too large to be attributed to chance. It generalizes the Z test, which is appropriate when only two proportions are being compared in the data.

If I interact these demographic characteristics with each of the treatment conditions, the interaction effects do not have statistically significant effects on support for democracy promotion.

People can recommend more than one type of action.

Pew Center Polls. Pew Global Attitudes Project: Spring 2007, June 27, 2007.

The public opinion polls on which this statement is based are as follows: (1): “As a rule US foreign policy should pursue US interests, which sometimes means promoting democracy and sometimes means supporting non-democratic governments.” Responses: 54 % agree, 38 % disagree and 8 % no answer; (2) “Do you think the US should or should not support a country becoming a democracy if there is a high likelihood that the people will elect an Islamic fundamentalist leader?” Responses: 54 % should not; 32 % should; 15 % no answer. See: PIPA/Chicago Council Polls, September 15–21, 2005.

Berinsky, A. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from world war II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Berinsky, A. J., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). The polls—Review public opinion research and support for the Iraq war. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(1), 126–141.CrossRef

Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRef

Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Downs, G. W. (2006). Intervention and democracy. International Organization, 60(3), 627–649.

Carothers, T. (2006). The backlash against democracy promotion. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 55–68.CrossRef

Davis, T. R., & Lynn-Jones, S. M. (1987). Citty upon a hall. Foreign Policy, 66(Spring), 20–38.CrossRef

DeBartolo, D. M. (2008). Perceptions of US democracy promotion, part two: American views. Washington DC: Project on Middle East Democracy.

Desch, M. C. (2008). America’s liberal illiberalism: The ideological origins of overreaction in U.S. foreign policy. International Security, 7–43.CrossRef

Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4):1151–1169.CrossRef

Drezner, D. W. (2008). The realist tradition in American public opinion. Perspectives on Politics, 6(1), 51–70.CrossRef

Dunning, T. (2004). Conditioning the effects of aid: Cold war politics, donor credibility, and democracy in Africa. International Organization, 58(Spring), 409–423.

Eckles, D. L., & Schaffner, B. F. (2011). Risk tolerance and support for potential military intervention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 533–545.CrossRef

Eichenberg, R. C. (2003). Gender differences in public attitudes toward the use of force by the United States, 1990-2003. International Security, 2(1), 110–141.CrossRef

Farber, H. S., & Gowa, J. (1995). Politices and peace. International Security, 20(2), 123–146.CrossRef

Finkel, S. E., Green, A., Pérez-Liñán, A., Seligson, M., & Tate, C. N. (2008). Cross-national research on USAID’s democracy and governance programs: Codebook (phase ii). http://www.pitt.edu/politics/democracy/.../Codebook_Phase_2.pdf.

Fite, D., Genest, M., & Wilcox, C. (1990). Gender differences in foreign policy attitudes: A longitudinal analysis. American Politics Research, 18(4), 492–513.CrossRef

Gause III, F. G. (2005) Can democracy stop terrorism? Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 62–76.CrossRef

Gelpi, C., Feaver, P. D., & Reifler, J. (2005/2006). Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security, 30(3), 7–46.

Gibson, J. (1998). A sober second thought: An experiment in persuading Russians to tolerate. American Journal of Political Science, 42(July), 819–850.CrossRef

Gore, A. (1992). Earth in balance: Ecology and the human spirit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2010). Attitudes towards highly skilled and low skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 61–84.CrossRef

Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S., & Gleditsch, P. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace: Democracy, political change and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 33–48.

Hiscox, M. J. (2006). Through a glass and darkly: Framing effects and individuals’ attitudes towards international trade, international organization. International Organization, 60(3), 755–780.CrossRef

Jensen, N. M., & Young., D. J. (2008). A violent future? Political risk insurance markets and violence forecasts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(4), 527–547.CrossRef

Katzenstein, P. J., & Keohane, R. O. (2007). Anti-Americanisms in world politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kaufmann, C. (2004). Threat inflation and the failure of the marketplace of ideas: The selling of the Iraq war. International Security, 29(1), 5–48.CrossRef

Knack, S. (2004). Does foreign aid promote democracy?. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 251–266.CrossRef

Koh, H. H. (2002/2003). On American exceptionalism. Stanford Law Review, 55, 1479–1527.

Kohut, A., & Stokes, B. (2006). America against the world: How we are different and why we are disliked. New York: Owl Books.

Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816.CrossRef

Lipset, S. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.CrossRef

Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000). Free to trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 305–321.CrossRef

Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. L. (1995). Democratization and the danger of war. International Security, 20(1), 5–38.CrossRef

McFaul, M. (2004). Democracy promotion as a world value. The Washington Quarterly, 28(1), 147–163.CrossRef

Midlarsky, M. (1998). Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment. Journal of Peace Research, 35(3), 341–361.CrossRef

Milner, H. V., & Kubota, K. (2005). Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in developing countries. International Organization, 50(1), 107–143.

Mueller, J. (2005). The Iraq syndrome. Foreign Affairs, 84, 44–54.CrossRef

Mueller, J. E. (1971). Trends in popular support for the wars in Korea and Vietnam. The American Political Science Review, 65(2), 358–375.CrossRef

Narang, V., & Nelson, R. M. (2009). Who are these belligerent democratizers? Reassessing the impact of democratization on war. International Organization, 63(2), 357–379.CrossRef

Peffley, M., Hurwitz, J., & Sniderman, P. M. (1997). Racial stereotypes and whites’ political views of blacks in the context of welfare and crime. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 30–60.CrossRef

Pei, M. (2003). The paradoxes of American nationalism. Foreign Policy, 136, 31–37.

Pickering, J., & Peceny, M. (2006). Forging democracy at gunpoint. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 539–560.CrossRef

Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theory and facts. World Politics, 49(2), 155–183.CrossRef

Ross, M. (2006). Is democracy good for the poor? American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 860–874.CrossRef

Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Scheve, K., Lu, X., & Slaughter, M. (2012). Inequity aversion and the international distribution of trade protection. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 638–654.CrossRef

Scott, J. M., & Steele, C. A. (2011). Sponsoring democracy? The United States and democracy aid to the developing world 1988–2001. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 47–69.CrossRef

Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2005). Partisan conflict, public opinion and US foreign policy. Paper presented at the Inequality and Social Policy Seminar, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Snyder, J. L. (2000). From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

Sobel, R. (2000). To intervene or not to intervene in Bosnia: That was the question for the United States and Europe. In R. Y. S. Brigette Lebens Nacos, & P. Isernia (Eds.), Decisionmaking in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st century (pp. 111–132). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Stokes, S., & Boix, C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55(4), 517–549.CrossRef

Thrall, T. A., & Cramer, J. K., (Eds.) (2009). American foreign policy and the politics of fear: Threat inflation since 9/11. London: Routledge.

Tomz, M. (2007). Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach. International Organization, 61(4), 821–840.CrossRef

Tures, J. (2007). The democracy-promotion gap in American public opinion. Journal of American Studies, 41(3), 557–579.CrossRef

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 207–233.CrossRef

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Weber, S., & Jentleson, B. W. (2010). The end of arrogance: America in the global competition of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wollack, K. (2008). Democracy promotion: Serving U.S. values and interests. Northwestern University Law Review, 102(1), 433–436.

Yankelovich, D. (2005). Poll positions: What Americans really think about US foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 2–16.CrossRef

Titel: The Determinants of US Public Opinion Towards Democracy Promotion
verfasst von: Dawn Brancati
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Political Behavior / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9256-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Basic Personal Values Underlie and Give Coherence to Political Values: A Cross National Study in 15 Countries

Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

Social Context and Information Seeking: Examining the Effects of Network Attitudinal Composition on Engagement with Political Information

Political Participation and Civic Courage: The Negative Effect of Transparency on Making Small Campaign Contributions

Ideological Proximity and Support for The Supreme Court

Decomposing the Relationship Between Candidates’ Facial Appearance and Electoral Success