nach oben

Political Behavior

Erschienen in:

01.03.2015 | Original Paper

Ricochet: How Elite Discourse Politicizes Racial and Ethnic Identities

verfasst von: Efrén O. Pérez

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Political elites often discuss racial/ethnic outgroups in a critical light. I claim this discourse raises the salience of group identity while impugning its worth, thus inducing differential political reactions among high and low identifying group members. Specifically, high identifiers will engage in political efforts that restore their identity’s positive value by displaying ingroup favoritism and challenging the source of their group’s devaluation. In contrast, low identifiers will actively decline political opportunities to bolster their group’s devalued status. Using a national survey experiment, I randomly assigned eligible but unregistered Latino voters to a control group without elite discourse; a non-devaluing condition with elite discourse focused on illegal immigration; or, a devaluing condition with elite discourse focused on illegal immigration and critical of illegal immigrants. High identifying Latinos in the devaluing condition expressed greater pro-Latino political attitudes and a stronger intention to register and vote in a pending presidential election. This dynamic was absent in the other conditions and unrelated to Latinos’ partisan identity. These results suggest an identity-to-politics link is robustly forged among high identifying group members when they sense a devaluation of their group.

Vorheriger Artikel The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization: Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design

Nächster Artikel Learning Citizenship? How State Education Reforms Affect Parents’ Political Attitudes and Behavior

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

I use identification, commitment, and attachment interchangeably throughout the paper (cf. Ellemers et al. 2002).

My use of social identity theory and self-categorization theory emphasizes the synergy between both lines of work. This does not mean there are no differences between them (Huddy 2001).

This is not to say that “Reluctants” and “Recruits” are not worthy of systematic study. However, time and resource constraints limited my ability to simultaneously examine all three of these Latino sub-electorates within a single study. For example, studying “Reluctants” would require items (e.g., decision to naturalize) that could not be added without removing other questions essential to my hypothesis tests (i.e., Latino identity).

Besides age and citizenship status, prior criminal history can bar people from voting, though there is wide variation in how states apply this last criterion (Uggen et al. 2012). Given this topic’s sensitivity, I did not ask about criminal history to avoid affecting data quality through lower cooperation rates and/or attrition. Using available data, I assess some of the tradeoffs of my decision (Table B, in Supporting Information). Those results suggest the effects I uncover are, at worst, conservative estimates of the phenomenon I am interested in.

In the full sample, the distribution of identity strength is: 26 %-(strongly agree); 27 %-(somewhat agree); 21 %-(somewhat disagree); and 26 %-(strongly disagree), with no reliable difference in identity levels between unregistered Latinos (M = 2.42) and all other Latinos in the survey (M = 2.48) (t = 0.68, p = 0.50).

Beyond Garcia Bedolla (2005), others have shown that the association between Latinos and illegal immigration is regularly transmitted by news media. For example, in other research, I show that news reports on Latino illegal immigration outweigh reports on Latino legal immigration by a ratio of about 90–10 % (Pérez 2013a). This pattern is part of a larger trend in contemporary U.S. immigration news coverage, which often focuses on Latino rather than non-Latino groups (Valentino et al. 2013).

The polychoric correlation between both items is robust and reliable (ρ = 0.42, P < 0.001). This index originally ran continuously from 2 to 8 in 1-point increments. I transform this scale to run continuously from 0 to 1 to facilitate the interpretation of my pending interactive results (Kam and Franzese 2007, p. 20–21; Achen 1982, p. 77).

Due to rounding, these percentages sum to 99 %, rather than 100 %.

That is, individuals in each experimental condition are alike in all observable and unobservable characteristics, chance variations aside (Mutz 2011). Hence, there is less need to control for attributes that do not vary between individuals.

Given the directional nature of my hypothesis—i.e., a positive interaction between identity and devaluing rhetoric—and the fact that this type of dynamic has been observed in independent lab studies done by social psychologists (Ellemers et al. 2002; Branscombe et al. 1999b), I use one-tailed significance tests when interpreting the pending interactive results. However, using two-tailed tests of significance leaves my conclusions unchanged.

This proposed test is especially relevant here because ethnic and partisan identities are not randomly assigned, as it is difficult to experimentally manipulate identity levels in a way deemed externally valid by political scientists. Thus, consistent with prior studies utilizing SIT (e.g., Doosje et al. 1995, 1999), I examine the extent to which observed levels of Latino and partisan identity condition the response to my randomly assigned treatment.

In fact, ancillary analyses reveal that this conclusion does not change if we compare Mexican Latinos to non-Mexican Latinos (Table C, in Supporting Information).

Once again, ancillary analyses reveal that this conclusion does not change if we compare Mexican Latinos to non-Mexican Latinos (Table C, in Supporting Information)..

Indeed, for pro-Latino attitude and register to vote, the interaction between ethnic identity and devaluing rhetoric yields effect sizes that are on the strong side. Cohen’s d values around 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80 are considered small, medium, and large, respectively (Cohen 1988). Both of my analyses yield Cohen’s d ≥ 0.75. For further information, see Table A (in Supporting Information)..

One might wonder whether the dynamic I have unearthed explains other aspects of politics among all Latinos—not just those that are unregistered to vote. It appears to. In a separate study that examines registered and unregistered Latinos (Pérez 2013b), I find that devaluing rhetoric produces greater ethnocentrism among high identifying Latinos. Statistically, this pattern is no different among unregistered Latinos than among the fuller sample of Latinos (Table D, in Supporting Information). I thank reviewer 2 for constructive advice on this point.

Abrajano, M. A., & Alvarez, R. M. (2010). New faces, new voices: The Hispanic electorate in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Achen, C. H. (1982). Interpreting and using regression. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Armenta, B. E., & Hunt, J. S. (2009). Responding to societal devaluation: Effects of perceived personal and group discrimination on the ethnic group identification and personal self-esteem of Latino/Latina adolescents. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 23–29.CrossRef

Arvizu, J.R. (1994). National origin based variation of Latino voter turnout in 1988: Findings from the Latino National Political Survey. Working paper series no. 21. Tucson: Mexican American Studies and Research Center, University of Arizona.

Arvizu, J. R., & Garcia, F. C. (1996). Latino voting participation: Explaining and differentiating Latino voting turnout. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(2), 104–128.CrossRef

Barreto, M. A., Manzano, S., Ramirez, R., & Rim, K. (2009). Mobilization, participation, and solidaridad: Latino participation in the 2006 immigration protest rallies. Urban Affairs Review, 44(5), 736–764.CrossRef

Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959–978.CrossRef

Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999a). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity context, commitment, content (pp. 35–59). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999b). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135–149.CrossRef

Branton, R. (2007). Latino attitudes toward various areas of public policy. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 293–303.CrossRef

Calvo, M. A., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1989). Hispanic political participation. San Antonio: Southwest Voter Research Institute Inc.

Census Bureau. (2011). The Hispanic population in the United States: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Chang, G. H. (2001). Asian Americans and politics: Some perspectives from history. In G. H. Chang (Ed.), Asian Americans and politics: Perspectives, experiences, prospects (pp. 13–38). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Chavez, L. R. (2001). Covering immigration: Popular images and the politics of the nation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chong, D., & Rogers, R. (2005). Racial solidarity and political participation. Political Behavior, 27(4), 347–374.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cronin, T. J., Levin, S., Branscombe, N. R., van Laar, C., & Tropp, L. R. (2012). Ethnic identification in response to perceived discrimination protects well-being and promotes activism: A longitudinal study of Latino college students. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(3), 393–407.CrossRef

Cruz, T. H., Marshall, S. W., Bowling, J. M., & Villaveces, A. (2008). The validity of a proxy acculturation scale among U.S. Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30(4), 425–446.CrossRef

Danigelis, N. L. (1978). Black political participation in the United States: Some recent evidence. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 756–771.CrossRef

Dawson, M. C. (1994). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

DeSipio, L. (1996). Counting on the Latino vote: Latinos as a new electorate. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.CrossRef

Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and intergroup behaviour. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity context, commitment, content (pp. 84–106). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57–76.CrossRef

Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘narrow data base’. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41–57). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Ellemers, N., Barreto, M., & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and strategic responses to social context. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity context, commitment, and content (pp. 127–146). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626.CrossRef

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186.CrossRef

Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 243–251.CrossRef

Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827.CrossRef

Fraga, L. R., Garcia, J. A., Hero, R. E., Jones-Correa, M., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Segura, G. M. (2006). Latino National Survey (LNS), 2006. Ann Arbor: Inter University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Fry, R., & Passel, J. S. (2009). Latino children: A majority are U.S.-born offspring of immigrants. Washington: Pew Hispanic Center.

García, J. A. (2012). Latino politics in America: Community, culture, and interests (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Garcia Bedolla, L. (2005). Fluid borders: Latino power, identity, and politics in Los Angeles. Berkeley: UC Press.

Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Gilliam, F. D., Jr. (1999). The welfare queen experiment. Nieman Reports, 53(2), 49–53.

Grier, P. (2010). Sharron angle ad: Is it racist?. Washington: Christian Science Monitor.

Hancock, A. (2004). The politics of disgust: The public identity of the welfare queen. New York: New York University Press.

Hero, R. E., & Campbell, A. G. (1996). Understanding Latino political participation: Exploring evidence from the Latino National Political Survey. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(2), 129–141.CrossRef

Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.CrossRef

Hutchings, V. L., Jardina, A. A., Walton, H., & Mickey, R. (2011). The politics of race: How threat cues and group position can activate white identity. Working paper. University of Michigan.

Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 241–254.CrossRef

Jones-Correa, M., & Leal, D. L. (1996). Becoming “Hispanic”: Secondary panethnic identification among Latin American-Origin populations in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(2), 214–254.CrossRef

Junn, J. (2006). Mobilizing group consciousness: When does ethnicity have political consequences? In T. Lee, S. K. Ramakrishnan, & R. Ramírez (Eds.), Transforming politics, transforming America: The political and civic incorporation of immigrants in the United States (pp. 32–47). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

Junn, J. (2007). From coolie to model minority: U.S. immigration policy and the construction of racial identity. Du Bois. Review, 4(2), 355–373.

Junn, J., & Masuoka, N. (2008). Asian American identity: Shared racial status and political context. Perspectives on Politics, 6(4), 729–740.CrossRef

Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & L. Gardner (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kinder, D. R., & Dale-Riddle, A. (2012). The end of race? Obama, 2008, and racial politics in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Knoll, B. R., Redlawsk, D. P., & Sanborn, H. B. (2011). Framing labels and immigration policy attitudes in the Iowa caucuses: ‘Trying to out-Tancredo Tancredo’. Political Behavior, 33(3), 433–454.CrossRef

Leach, C. W., Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Vliek, M. L. W., & Hirt, E. (2010). Group devaluation and group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 535–552.CrossRef

Lee, R. G. (1999). Orientals: Asian Americans in popular culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Lee, T. (2008). Race, immigration, and the identity-to-politics link. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 457–478.CrossRef

Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114.CrossRef

Lien, P. (1994). Ethnicity and political participation: A comparison between Asian and Mexican Americans. Political Behavior, 16(2), 237–264.CrossRef

Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318.CrossRef

Manzano, S., & Sanchez, G. R. (2010). Take one for the team? Limits of shared ethnicity and candidate preferences. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 568–580.CrossRef

Marschall, M. (2001). Does the shoe fit? Testing models of participation for African American and Latino behavior in local politics. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 227–248.CrossRef

McClain, P. D., Johnson Carew, J. D., Walton, E., Jr, & Watts, C. S. (2009). Group membership, group identity, and group consciousness: Measures of racial identity in American politics? Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 471–485.CrossRef

Merolla, J. L., Pantoja, A. D., Cargile, I. A. M., & Mora, J. (2012). From coverage to action: The immigration debate and its effects on participation. Political Research Quarterly,. doi:10.1177/1065912912443313.

Michelson, M. R. (2005). Meeting the challenge of Latino voter mobilization. Annals of Political and Social Science, 601, 85–101.CrossRef

Miller, A. H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G., & Malanchuk, O. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 494–511.CrossRef

Miller, L., Polinard, J., & Wrinkle, R. (1984). Attitudes toward undocumented workers: The Mexican American perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 6, 482–494.

Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055–1078.CrossRef

Olsen, M. (1970). Social and political participation of blacks. American Sociological Review, 35, 682–697.CrossRef

Pantoja, A., Ramirez, R., & Segura, G. M. (2001). Citizens by choice, voters by necessity: Patterns in political mobilization by naturalized Latinos. Political Research Quarterly, 54(4), 729–750.CrossRef

Pantoja, A. D., & Segura, G. M. (2003). Fear and loathing in California: Contextual threat and political sophistication among Latino voters. Political Behavior, 25(3), 265–286.CrossRef

Pérez, E. O. (2013a). Unspoken: Implicit attitudes and political thinking. Vanderbilt University (unpublished manuscript).

Pérez, E. O. (2013b). Xenophobic rhetoric and its political effects on immigrants and their co-ethnics. Working paper. Vanderbilt University.

Ramírez, R. (2005). Giving voice to Latino voters: A field experiment on the effectiveness of a national nonpartisan mobilization effort. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 66–84.CrossRef

Ramírez, R., & Fraga, L. (2008). Continuity and change: Latino political incorporation in California since 1990. In S. Bass & B. E. Cain (Eds.), Racial and ethnic politics in California: Continuity and change. Berkeley: Berkeley Public Policy Press.

Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42.CrossRef

Sanchez, G. R. (2006). The role of group consciousness in political participation among Latinos in the United States. American Politics Research, 34(4), 427–450.CrossRef

Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Sears, D. O., Van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of White Americans opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 16–53.CrossRef

Sears, D. O., & Victoria, S. (2006). The political color line in America: Many “peoples of color” or Black exceptionalism? Political Psychology, 27(6), 895–924.CrossRef

Shadish, W., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Shaw, D., de la Garza, R. O., & Lee, J. (2000). Examining Latino turnout in 1996: A three-state, validated survey approach. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 338–346.CrossRef

Shingles, R. D. (1981). Black consciousness and political participation: The missing link. American Political Science Review, 75(1), 76–91.CrossRef

Sniderman, P. M., & Hagendoorn, L. (2007). When ways of life collide: Multiculturalism and its discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 538–553.CrossRef

Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1999). Commitment and the context of social perception. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity context, commitment, content (pp. 59–83). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.CrossRef

Taber, C. S. (2000). Information processing and public opinion. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 433–476). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flamente, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.CrossRef

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

Tate, K. (1991). Black political participation in the 1984 and 1988 presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 85, 1160–1176.CrossRef

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Re-discovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Uggen, C., Shannon, S., & Manza, J. (2012). State-level estimates of felon disenfranchisement in the United States, 2020. Washington: The Sentencing Project.

Uhlaner, C., Cain, B., & Kiewiet, D. R. (1989). Political participation of ethnic minorities in the 1980s. Political Behavior, 11(3), 195–231.CrossRef

Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., & Jardina, A. (2013). Immigration opposition among U.S. whites: General ethnocentrism or media priming of attitudes about Latinos? Political Psychology, 34(2), 149–166.CrossRef

Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. New York: Harper.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Race, ethnicity, and political resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 453–497.CrossRef

Wong, C., & Cho, G. E. (2005). Two-headed coins or kandinskys: White racial identification. Political Psychology, 26(5), 699–720.CrossRef

Zolberg, A. R., & Woon, L. L. (1999). Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics and Society, 27, 5–38.CrossRef

Titel: Ricochet: How Elite Discourse Politicizes Racial and Ethnic Identities
verfasst von: Efrén O. Pérez
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Political Behavior / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9262-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Explaining Group Influence: The Role of Identity and Emotion in Political Conformity and Polarization

The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization: Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design

Editor’s Introduction

Party Identification and Vote Choice in Partisan and Nonpartisan Elections

Call Your Legislator: A Field Experimental Study of the Impact of a Constituency Mobilization Campaign on Legislative Voting

“Simply un-American”: Nativism and Support for Health Care Reform