Skip to main content
Log in

Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing interest in the use of models that recognise the role of individuals’ attitudes and perceptions in choice behaviour. Rather than relying on simple linear approaches or a potentially bias-inducing deterministic approach based on incorporating stated attitudinal indicators directly in the choice model, researchers have recently recognised the latent nature of attitudes. The uptake of such latent attitude models in applied work has however been slow, while a number of overly simplistic assumptions are also commonly made. In this article, we present an application of jointly estimated attitudinal and choice models to a real-world transport study, looking at the role of latent attitudes in a rail travel context. Our results show the impact that concern with privacy, liberty and security, and distrust of business, technology and authority have on the desire for rail travel in the face of increased security measures, as well as for universal security checks. Alongside demonstrating the applicability of the model in applied work, we also address a number of theoretical issues. We first show the equivalence of two different normalisations discussed in the literature. Unlike many other latent attitude studies, we explicitly recognise the repeated choice nature of the data. Finally, the main methodological contribution comes in replacing the typically used continuous model for attitudinal response by an ordered logit structure which more correctly accounts for the ordinal nature of the indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A linear structural relation (LISREL) model is a special case.

  2. For alternatives that can be labelled it would be usual to include sufficient unit values in X to allow appropriate constants to be estimated. That is, X(J,M) represents the measured variables, both alternative-specific and socio-economic (and compounds of these) that affect choice.

  3. For the present study we have not introduced off-diagonal elements into the covariance matrix E of the distribution, allowing for correlation between different attitudinal responses, but the possibility of doing so is provided within the notation.

  4. However, note that Ben-Akiva and Bolduc are actually both among the authors of both papers.

References

  • Ashok, K., Dillon, W.R., Yuan, S.: Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. J. Mark. Res. 39(1), 31–46 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2006) Extracts from MI5 chief’s speech (Interview of Eliza Manningham-Buller) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6135000.stm. May 2008

  • Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A.T., Gopinath, D.A., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A.: Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y.: A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. B 41(5), 506–526 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolduc D., Daziano R.A.: On the estimation of hybrid choice models. Paper presented at the international choice modelling conference, Harrogate (2008)

  • Bolduc, D., Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Michaud, A.: Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models. In: Lee-Gosselin, M., Doherty, S. (eds.) Integrated land-use and transportation models: behavioural foundations, pp. 275–302. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, S., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice. Transp. Res. A 38, 201–222 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P: DAC Peter Clark’s speech on counter terrorism. Metropolitan Police. http://cms.met.police.uk/news/major_operational_announcements/terrorism/dac_peter_clark_s_speech_on_counter_terrorism. May 2008 (2007)

  • Cozens, P.M., Neale, R.H., Whitaker, J., Hillier, D.: Investigating perceptions of personal security on the valley lines network in South Wales. World Transp. Policy Pract. 8(1), 19–29 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornik, J.A.: Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Language. Timberlake Consultants Press, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T.: Choice map: inferring a product-market maps from panel data. Mark. Sci. 7(1), 21–40 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T., Keane, M.P.: A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. J. Mark. Res. 32(1), 1–16 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T.: Behavioral assumptions overlooked in travel-choice modelling. In: Ortuzar, J., Jara-Diaz, S., Hensher, D. (eds.) Transport Modelling, pp. 3–18. Pergamon, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T.: Joint models of attitudes and behaviour in evaluation of the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project. Transp. Res. A 35, 495–514 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T.F.: Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp. Res. B 37(1), 1–25 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T.F., Bunch, D.S., Brownstone, D.: A vehicle use forecasting model based on revealed and stated vehicle type choice and utilization data. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 31, 69–92 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D.L., Hensher, D.: Modelling Ordered Choices: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, V.M., Heldt, T., Johansson, P.: The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp. Res. A 40(6), 507–525 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L.F.: Privacy Indexes: A Survey of Westin’s Studies. Institute for Software Research International, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis Harris, & Associates, Westin, A.F.: Equifax-Harris Consumer Privacy Survey. Technical Report Conducted for Equifax Inc. 1, 005 Adults of the U.S. Public. Louis Harris & Associates, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, T., Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D.: Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data. In: Franses, P.H., Montgomery, A.L. (eds.) Econometric Models in Marketing. Advances in Econometrics, vol. 16, 16th edn, pp. 29–55. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Potoglou, D., Robinson, N., Kim, C.W., Burge, P., Warnes, R.: Quantifying individuals’ trade-offs between privacy, liberty and security: the case of rail travel in UK. Transp. Res. A 44(3), 169–181 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S., Bhat, C.R., Holguin-Veras, J.: Empirical analysis of the impact of security perception on intercity mode choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 2006, 9–15 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temme, D., Paulssen, M., Dannewald, T.: Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models—a simulation estimation approach using SEM software. Bus. Res. 1(2), 220–237 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Dept. for Transport: Responsibilities of Transport Security’s Land Transport Division http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/security/land/responsibilitiesoftransports4898. Nov 2008 (2006)

  • UK Dept. for Transport: Summary report of the ‘LUNR’ passenger screening trials http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/security/land/lunr. Dec 2008 (2008)

  • Walker, J., Ben-Akiva, M.: Generalized random utility model. Math. Soc. Sci. 43(3), 303–343 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yañez, M.F., Raveau, S., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: modelling and forecasting. Trans. Res. Part A 44, 744–753 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the advice of Moshe Ben-Akiva, particularly concerning the specification of the alternative normalisations of the model. Responsibility for any errors or interpretations remains the responsibility of the authors alone. Stephane Hess also acknowledges the support of the Leverhulme Trust in the form of a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlene Rohr.

Additional information

The author names are arranged alphabetically.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daly, A., Hess, S., Patruni, B. et al. Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour. Transportation 39, 267–297 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z

Keywords

Navigation