Skip to main content
Log in

Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Received stochastic frontier analyses with panel data have relied on traditional fixed and random effects models. We propose extensions that circumvent two shortcomings of these approaches. The conventional panel data estimators assume that technical or cost inefficiency is time invariant. Second, the fixed and random effects estimators force any time invariant cross unit heterogeneity into the same term that is being used to capture the inefficiency. Inefficiency measures in these models may be picking up heterogeneity in addition to or even instead of inefficiency. A fixed effects model is extended to the stochastic frontier model using results that specifically employ the nonlinear specification. The random effects model is reformulated as a special case of the random parameters model. The techniques are illustrated in applications to the U.S. banking industry and a cross country comparison of the efficiency of health care delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Abrevaya (1997) ArticleTitle‘‘The Equivalence of Two Estimators of the Fixed Effects Logit Model’‘ Economics Letters 55 IssueID1 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Aigner K. Lovell P. Schmidt (1977) ArticleTitle‘‘Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Function Models’‘ Journal of Econometrics 6 21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Andersen (1970) ArticleTitle‘‘Asymptotic Properties of Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimators’‘ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 32 283–301

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Battese T. Coelli (1992) ArticleTitle‘‘Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India’‘ Journal of Productivity Analysis 3 IssueID1 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Battese T. Coelli (1995) ArticleTitle‘‘A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data’‘ Empirical Economics 20 325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bauer A. Berger D. Humphrey (1993) ‘‘Efficiency and Productivity Growth in U.S. Banking’‘ H. Fried K. Lovell S. Schmidt (Eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Berger L. Mester (1997) ArticleTitle‘‘Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions?’‘ Journal of Banking and Finance 21 895–947

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bhat (1999) ‘‘Quasi-Random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model’‘ Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Chamberlain (1980) ArticleTitle‘‘Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data’‘ Review of Economic Studies 47 225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Cornwell P. Schmidt R. Sickles (1990) ArticleTitle‘‘Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels’‘ Journal of Econometrics 46 IssueID1 185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Econometric Software, Inc. (2002). LIMDEP, Version 8.0, ESI, New York.

  • B. Gong R. Sickles (1989) ArticleTitle‘‘Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontier Models Using Panel Data’‘ Journal of Productivity Analysis 1 229–261

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gourieroux A. Monfort (1996) Simulation Based Econometrics Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Gravelle R. Jacobs A. Jones A. Street (2002) ‘‘Comparing the Efficiency of National Health Systems: Econometric Analysis Should be Handled with Care’‘ University of York, Health Economics UK

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Greene (1997) ‘‘Frontier Production Functions’‘ M. H. Pesaran P. Schmidt (Eds) Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Volume II: Microeconometrics Blackwell Publishers Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2001). ‘‘Fixed and Random Effects in Nonlinear Models’’. Working Paper Number 01–01, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University.

  • Greene, W. (2002). ‘‘The Behavior of the Fixed Effects Estimator in Nonlinear Models’’. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University.

  • W. Greene (2003a) Econometric Analysis Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2000b) ‘‘Distinguishing Between Heterogeneity and Inefficiency: Stochastic Frontier Analysis of the World Health Organization’s Panel Data on National Health Care Systems’’. Working Paper, 03–10, April.

  • Greene, W. (2004). ‘‘Reconsidering Heterogeneity and Inefficiency: Alternative Estimators for Stochastic Frontier Models’’, Journal of Econometrics. (forthcoming).

  • Greene, W. and S. Misra (2002). ‘‘Simulated Maximum Likelihood Estimation of General Stochastic Frontier Regressions’’. Manuscript, Department of Marketing, Simon School of Business, University of Rochester.

  • Habib, M. and A. Ljungqvist. (2002). ‘‘Firm Value and Managerial Incentives: A Stochastic Frontier Approach’’. Manuscript, Department of Finance, Stern School of Business, New York University.

  • Han, C., L. Orea and P. Schmidt. (2002). ‘‘Estimation of a Panel Data Model with Parametric Temporal Variation in Individual Effects’’. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Michigan State University.

  • J. Heckman T. MaCurdy (1981) ArticleTitle‘‘A Life Cycle Model of Female Labor Supply’‘ Review of Economic Studies 47 247–283

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Heshmati S. Kumbhakar (1994) ArticleTitle‘‘Farm Heterogeneity and Technical Efficiency: Some Results from Swedish Dairy Farms’‘ Journal of Productivity Analysis 5 IssueID1 45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Heckman (1981) ‘‘The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-discrete Data Stochastic Process’‘ C. Manski D. McFadden (Eds) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, B. and Wildman, J. (2002). ‘‘The Efficiency of Health Production: Reestimating the WHO Panel Data Using Parametric and Non-parametric Approaches to Provide Additional Information’’. Economics of Health Care Systems, 11 (forthcoming).

  • C. Hsiao (1996) ‘‘Logit and Probit Models’‘ L. Matyas P. Sevestre (Eds) The Econometrics of Panel Data Handbook of Theory and Applications, Second Revised Edition Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Jondrow I. Materov K. Lovell P. Schmidt (1982) ArticleTitle‘‘On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model’‘ Journal of Econometrics 19 IssueID2/3 233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Kim P. Schmidt (2000) ArticleTitle‘‘A Review and Empirical Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Inference on Efficiency Levels in Stochastic Frontier Models with Panel Data’‘ Journal of Productivity Analysis 14 IssueID2 91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kumbhakar (1990) ArticleTitle‘‘Production Frontiers, Panel Data, and Time Vary ing Technical Inefficiency’‘ Journal of Econometrics 46 IssueID1/2 201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. and A. Heshmati. (1995). ‘‘Efficiency Measurement in Swedish Dairy Farms: An Application of Rotating Panel Data, 1976 1988’’. it American Journal of Agricultural Economics 660 674.

  • S. Kumbhakar L. Hjalmarsson (1993) ‘‘Technical Efficiency and Technical Progress in Swedish Dairy Farms’‘ H. Fried K. Lovell S. Schmidt (Eds) The Measurement of Productive EfficiencyTechniques and Applications New York New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kumbhakar K. Lovell (2000) Stochastic Frontier Analysis Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar S.,and L. Orea. (2003). ‘‘Efficiency Measurement Using a Stochastic Frontier Latent Class Model’’. Empirical Economics, University of Oviedo. (forthcoming).

  • S. Kumbhakar M. Tsionas (2002) ‘‘Nonparametric Stochastic Frontier Models’‘ Department of Economics, State University of New York Binghamton

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lancaster (2000) ArticleTitle‘‘The Incidental Parameters Problem Since 1948’‘ Journal of Econometrics 95 391–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Lee P. Schmidt (1993) ‘‘A Production Frontier Model with Flexible Temporal Variation in Technical Inefficiency’‘ H. Fried K. Lovell (Eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Neyman E. Scott (1948) ArticleTitle‘‘Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations’‘ Econometrica 16 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Pitt L. Lee (1981) ArticleTitle‘‘The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in Indonesian Weaving Industry’‘ Journal of Development Economics 9 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. and B. Yoon. (1994). ‘‘Estimating a Two Tiered Earnings Function’’. Working Paper, Department of Economics, State University of New York, Binghamton

  • S. Polachek B. Yoon (1996) ArticleTitle‘‘Panel Estimates of a Two Tiered Earnings Frontier’‘ Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Prentice L. Gloeckler (1978) ArticleTitle‘‘Regression Analysis of Grouped Survival Data with Application to Breast Cancer Data’‘ Biometrics 34 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Rao (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and Its Application John Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Schmidt R. Sickles (1984) ArticleTitle‘‘Production Frontiers with Panel Data’‘ Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2 IssueID4 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Sueyoshi (1993) ‘‘Techniques for the Estimation of Maximum Likelihood Models with Large Numbers of Group Effects’‘ Department of Economics, University of California San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Train (2002) Discrete Choice: Methods with Simulation Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tsionas (2002) ArticleTitle‘‘Stochastic Frontier Models with Random Coefficients’‘ Journal of Applied Econometrics 17 127–147

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Health Organization (2000) ‘‘World Health ReportHealth Systems: Improving Performance’‘ WHO Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2002). ‘‘Simple Solutions to the Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity’’. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Michigan State University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willam Greene.

Additional information

JEL classification: C1, C4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greene, W. Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models. J Prod Anal 23, 7–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1

Keywords

Navigation