Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quantum Information Processing
Erschienen in: Quantum Information Processing 6/2015

01.06.2015

Quantum private comparison with a malicious third party

verfasst von: Zhiwei Sun, Jianping Yu, Ping Wang, Lingling Xu, Chunhui Wu

Erschienen in: Quantum Information Processing | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, we will show that quantum private comparison protocol is secure when a malicious third party is presented. The security of the protocol is considered in a cheat-sensitive model, in which the TP is kept honest by the possibility of being caught cheating. Besides, we enhance the privacy of the quantum private comparison protocol, where the participants’ inputs and the comparison result can be preserved. Furthermore, in contrast to pervious protocols requiring a large amount of quantum resources, such as entanglement and quantum memory, our protocol is based on BB84 protocol, which is more feasible for practical applications. Finally, we analyze the security of the presented protocol.
Vorheriger Artikel Two-layer quantum key distribution
Nächster Artikel Efficient and faithful remote preparation of arbitrary three- and four-particle -class entangled states

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Yao, A.: Protocols for Secure Computations. In: Proceedings of 23rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’ 82), 160 (1982)
2.
Goldreich, O.: Foundations of Cryptography, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004). Chapter 7CrossRefMATH
3.
Lindell, Y., Pinkas, B.: Secure multiparty computation for privacy-preserving data mining. J. Priv. Confid. 1, 59 (2009)
4.
Chor, B., Goldreich, O., Kushilevitz E., Sudan, M.: Private Information Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, 41 (1995)
5.
Colbeck, R.: Impossibility of secure two-party classical computation. Phys. Rev. A 76, 062308 (2007)ADS
6.
Crépeau, C., Gottesman, D., Smith, A.: Secure Multi-party Quantum Computation, STOC02, 643 (2002)
7.
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India (IEEE, New York, 1984), 175 (1984)
8.
9.
Hillery, M., Bužek, V., Berthiaume, A.: Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999)ADSMathSciNet
10.
Karlsson, A., Koashi, M., Imoto, N.: Quantum entanglement for secret sharing and secret splitting. Phys. Rev. A 59, 162 (1999)ADS
11.
Unruh, D.: Universally composable quantum multi-party computation. Adv. Cryptol. C EUROCRYPT 2010 6110, 486 (2010)CrossRefMathSciNet
12.
Long, G.L., Liu, X.S.: Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum key distribution scheme. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032302 (2002)ADS
13.
Deng, F.G., Long, G.L., Liu, X.S.: Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen pair block. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042317 (2003)ADS
14.
Deng, F.G., Long, G.L.: Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052319 (2004)ADS
15.
Sun, Z.W., Du, R.G., Long, D.Y.: Quantum secure direct communication with quantum identification. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10, 1250008 (2012)MathSciNet
16.
Sun, Z.W., Du, R.G., Long, D.Y.: Quantum secure direct communication with two-photon four-qubit cluster state. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 1946 (2012)MATHMathSciNet
17.
Lo, H.K.: Insecurity of quantum secure computations. Phys. Rev. A 56, 1154 (1997)ADS
18.
Buhrman, H., Christandl, M., Schaffner, C.: Complete insecurity of quantum protocols for classical two-party computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160501 (2012)ADS
19.
Yang, Y.G., Wen, Q.Y.: An efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 42, 055305 (2009)ADSMathSciNet
20.
Jakobsson, M., Yung, M.: Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’96, 1109, 186 (1996)
21.
Chen, X.-B., Xu, G., Niu, X.-X., Wen, Q.-Y., Yang, Y.-X.: An efficient protocol for the private comparison of equal information based on the triplet entangled state and single-particle measurement. Opt. Commun. 283, 1561 (2010)ADS
22.
Liu, W., Wang, Y.-B., Jiang, Z.-T.: An efficient protocol for the quantum private comparison of equality with W state. Opt. Commun. 284, 3160 (2011)ADS
23.
Sun, Z., Long, D.: Cryptanalysis of an efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement, arXiv:​1204.​4587, (2012)
24.
Tseng, H.-Y., Lin, J., Hwang, T.: New quantum private comparison protocol using EPR pairs. Quantum Inf. Process 11, 373 (2012)MATHMathSciNet
25.
Chen, X.-B., Dou, Z., Xu, G., Wang, C., Yang, Y.: A class of protocols for quantum private comparison based on the symmetry of states. Quantum Inf. Process 13, 85 (2014)ADSMATH
26.
Chen, X.-B., Su, Y., Niu, X., Yang, Y.-X.: Efficient and feasible quantum private comparison of equality against the collective amplitude damping noise. Quantum Inf. Process 13, 101 (2014)ADSMATH
27.
Liu, W., Wang, Y.-B., Jiang, Z.-T., Cao, Y.-Z.: A protocol for the quantum private comparison of equality with x-type state. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 69 (2011)MathSciNet
28.
Lin, S., Sun, Y., Liu, X.F., Yao, Z.Q.: Quantum private comparison protocol with d-dimensional Bell states. Quantum Inf. Process 12, 559–568 (2013)ADSMATHMathSciNet
29.
Liu, B., Gao, F., Jia, H., Huang, W., Zhang, W., Wen, Q.: Efficient quantum private comparison employing single photons and collective detection. Quantum Inf. Process 12, 887 (2013)ADSMATHMathSciNet
30.
Gao, F., Qin, S.J., Zhang, J., Wen, Q.Y.: Quantum private comparison protocol based on entanglement swapping of d-level Bell states. Quantum Inf. Process 12, 2793–2802 (2013)ADSMATHMathSciNet
31.
Shor Peter, W., John, P.: Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 441, 85 (2000)
32.
Ben-Or, M., Horodecki, M., Leung, D.W., Mayers, D., Oppenheim, J.: The universal composable security of quantum key distribution. In: Theory of Cryptography: Proceedings of TCC 2005, (Cambridge, MA, USA, Springer, 2005) 386–406 (2005)
33.
He, G.: Quantum protocols for the millionaire problem with a third party are trivial. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 11, 1350025 (2013)MathSciNet
34.
Liu, X., Zhang, B., Wang, J., Tang, C., Zhao, J.: Differential phase shift quantum private comparison. Quantum Inf. Process 13, 71–84 (2014)ADS
35.
Li, Y., Ma, Y., Xu, S., Huang, W., Zhang, Y.: Quantum private comparison based on phase encoding of single photons. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 3191–3200 (2014)MATH
36.
Lin, J., Yang, C., Hweng, T.: Quantum private comparison of equality protocol without a third party. Quantum Inf. Process 13, 239–247 (2014)MATHMathSciNet
Metadaten
Titel
Quantum private comparison with a malicious third party
verfasst von
Zhiwei Sun
Jianping Yu
Ping Wang
Lingling Xu
Chunhui Wu
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Quantum Information Processing / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1570-0755
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1332
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-0956-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Quantum Information Processing 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Correlations in -local scenario

OriginalPaper

Quantum discord for the general two-qubit case

OriginalPaper

Analytical solutions and criteria for the quantum discord of two-qubit X-states

OriginalPaper

Sudden death of distillability in a two-qutrit anisotropic Heisenberg spin model

OriginalPaper

A quantum algorithm for approximating the influences of Boolean functions and its applications

OriginalPaper

Rényi entropy uncertainty relation for successive projective measurements

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise