Abstract
Disaster scholars have investigated the nature of organizational resilience, but extant research has not examined various network strategies within hierarchical and horizontal collaboration structures. The question of how the structural arrangements for collaboration within emergency management networks influence disaster resilience remains unanswered. This study begins to fill this lacuna by analyzing a bonding and bridging strategy for interorganizational collaboration to determine how these patterns of organizational relations might enhance the level of organizational resilience in each hierarchical and horizontal emergency management network. Bonding strategies highlight the importance of trust and information redundancy to emergency preparedness and response. Bridging strategies capture the tendency for local actors to seek partners to obtain crucial information and resources across the region. The results support the study hypothesis that bridging strategies in hierarchical emergency management networks have a positive effect on the level of organizational resilience. Neither type of network strategy influenced resilience in horizontal network structures. The findings confirm that the coordinating role of the national and provincial governments is critical to the building of a resilient community in terms of interorganizational collaboration, and demonstrate the steering role of the national and provincial governments with regard to resilience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agranoff, R., McGuire, M.: Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. (2003)
Andrew, S.A., Arlikatti, S., Siebeneck, L., Pongponrat, K., Kraiwuth, J.: Forthcoming). Factors Explaining Organizational Resilience during the Thailand Floods of 2011: A Test of Bonding and Bridging Hypotheses. Disasters. (2014)
Andrew, S., Carr, B.Z.: Mitigating uncertainty and risk in planning for regional preparedness: the role of bonding and bridging relationships. Urban Stud. 50(4), 709–724 (2013). March
Bhamra, R., Dani, S., Burnard, K.: Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49(18), 5375–5393 (2011)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.: UCINET version 6.00. Analytic Technologies. Columbia University, New York (2002)
Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., Labianca, G.: Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916), 892–895 (2009)
Bourdieu, P.: Economic capital, cultural capital, social capital. Soziale-Welt 2, 183–198 (1983)
Brudney, Jeffrey L., Gazley, Beth: Planing to be prepared: an empirical examination of the role of voluntary organizations in county government emergency planning. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 372–399 (2009)
Bruneau, M., Chang, S.E., Eguchi, R.T., Lee, G.C., O’Rourke, T.D., Reinhorn, A.M., von Winterfeldt, D.: A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra 19(4), 733–752 (2003)
Burt, R.S.: Structural holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard Press, Cambridge (1992)
Burt, R.S.: Brokerage and Closure-An Introduction to Social Capital: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Cohn, A.D.: Mutual aid: intergovernmental agreements for emergency prepardness and response. Urban Lawyers 37(1), 1–52 (2005)
Comfort, L.K.: Shared risk: Complex systems in seismic response. Pergamon, Amsterdam (1999)
Comfort, L.K.: Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Adm. Rev. 67(s1), 189–197 (2007)
Comfort, L.K., Sungu, Y., Johnson, D., Dunn, M.: Complex systems in crisis: anticipation and resilience in dynamic environments. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 9(3), 144–158 (2001)
Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., Webb, J.: A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Change 18(4), 598–606 (2008)
Donaldson, L.: The normal science of structural contingency theory. Studying Organizations: Theory and Method. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1999)
Dooley, K.J.: A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dyn. Psychol. Life Sci. 1(1), 69–97 (1997)
Feiock, R.C.: Institutional collective action and local government collaboration. In: Bingham, L., O’Leary, R. (eds.) Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management. M.E. Sharpe, New York (2008)
Feiock, R.C.: Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Aff. Rev. 44(3), 356–377 (2009)
Feiock, R.C.: The institutional collective action framework. Policy Stud. J. 41, 397–425 (2013)
Jung, K.: Community resilience and emergency management networks: following the 2012 Korean typhoons. The Natural Hazards Center (Boulder, CO), Quick Response Report QR237 (2013)
Jung, K., Kim, Y., Song, M., Kim, J. W.: “Social media use for building safe Seoul: focusing on civic engagement in emergency management”. Seoul Institute (Seoul, South Korea), Seoul Research Report 14–06 (2014)
Katz, D., Kahn, R.L.: Organizations and the system concept. Soc. Psychol. Organ. 1, 14–29 (1966)
Kendra, J.M., Wachtendorf, T.: Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: reconstituting New York City’s Emergency Operations Centre. Disasters 27(1), 37–53 (2003)
Korean Meteorological Administration: The analysis report for typhoon effect on Korea. The National Typhoon Center (2013)
Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S., Perry, R.W.: Introduction to Emergency Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)
McEntire, D.A., Dawson, G.: The intergovernmental context. In: Waugh, W.L., Tierney, K.J. (eds.) Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government. International City/County Management Association, Washington, D.C (2007)
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Soc. 27, 415–444 (2001)
Mechanic, D.: Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 7, 349–364 (1962)
Moynihan, D.P.: The network governance of crisis response: case studies of incident command systems. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 19(4), 895–915 (2009)
Owen, W.F.: Metaphor analysis of cohesiveness and small discussion groups. Small Group Behav. 16, 415–424 (1985)
Paton, D., Millar, M., Johnston, D.: Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences. Nat. Hazards 24, 157–169 (2001)
Patton, A.: Collaborative emergency management. In: Waugh, W.L., Tierney, K.J. (eds.) Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government. International City/County Management Association, Washington, D.C (2007)
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R.: The design and management of externally controlled organizations. Pugh, DS Organization Theory, London (1978)
Robinson, M.: Building close-knit collaborative communities in ECE. Pacific Oaks College, CA (2012)
Soh, P.H., Mahmood, I., Mitchell, W.: Dynamic inducements in R&D investment:market signals and network locations. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 727–744 (2004)
Sutcliffe, K.M., Vogus, T.J.: Organizing for resilience. In: Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., Quinn, R.E. (eds.) Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, pp. 94–110. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc, San Francisco (2003)
Vogus, T. J., Sutcliffe, K. M. : Organizational resilience: towards a theory and research agenda. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2007. ISIC. IEEE International Conference, pp. 3418–3422, IEEE (2007)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)
Wenger, D.E.: Community response to disaster: functional and structural alterations. In: Quarantelli, E.L. (ed.) Disasters: Theory and research, pp. 18–47. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1978)
Yoon, D. K. :Disaster Policies and Emergency Management in Korea. In Disaster and Development, pp. 149–164, (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, K., Song, M. Linking emergency management networks to disaster resilience: bonding and bridging strategy in hierarchical or horizontal collaboration networks. Qual Quant 49, 1465–1483 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0092-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0092-x