nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.11.2008

Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice

verfasst von: Jose M. Valderas, Jordi Alonso

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 9/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The umbrella term Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) has been successfully proposed for instruments measuring perceived health outcomes, but its relationship to current conceptual models remains to be established. Our aim was to develop a classification system for PRO measures based on a valid conceptual model.

Methods

We reviewed models and classification schemes of health outcomes and integrated them in a common conceptual framework, based on the models by Wilson and Cleary and the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). We developed a cross-classification system based on the minimum common set of consistent concepts identified in previous classifications, and specified categories based on the WHO International Classifications (ICD-10, and ICF). We exemplified the use of the classification system with selected PRO instruments.

Results

We identified three guiding concepts: (1) construct (the measurement object); (2) population (based on age, gender, condition, and culture); and (3) measurement model (dimensionality, metric, and adaptability). The application of the system to selected PRO measures demonstrated the feasibility of its use, and showed that most of them actually assess more than one construct.

Conclusion

This classification system of PRO measures, based on a valid integrated conceptual model, should allow the classification of most currently used instruments and may facilitate a more adequate selection and application of these instruments.

Vorheriger Artikel A highly significant difference in baseline characteristics: the play of chance or evidence of a more selective game?

Nächster Artikel Reliability across studies from the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and its subscales: a reliability generalization

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Patrick, D. L., & Erickson, P. (1993). Health status and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 324(7351), 1417. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417.CrossRef

Tully, M. P., & Cantrill, J. A. (1999). Subjective outcome measurement—A primer. Pharmacy World & Science, 21(3), 101–109. doi:10.1023/A:1008694522700.CrossRef

Lenderking, W. (2003). Task force report of the patient-reported outcomes harmonization group: Too much harmony, not enough melody? Value in Health, 6(5), 503–504. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65002.x.PubMedCrossRef

Acquadro, C., Berzon, R., Dubois, D., et al. & PRO Harmonization Group. (2003). Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value in Health, 6(5), 522–531. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x.

Taillefer, M. C., Dupuis, G., Roberge, M. A., & Le May, S. (2003). Health-related quality of life models: Systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 64, 293–323. doi:10.1023/A:1024740307643.CrossRef

FDA. (2006). Draft guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medicinal product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register, 71, 5862–5863.

Levine, D. M., Morlock, L. L., Mushlin, A. I., Shapiro, S., & Malitz, F. E. (1976). The role of new health practitioners in a prepaid group practice: Provider differences in process and outcomes of medical care. Medical Care, 14(4), 326–347. doi:10.1097/00005650-197604000-00004.PubMedCrossRef

Schmidt, S., & Bullinger, M. (2003). Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4, Suppl 2), S29–S34. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50244.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Emery, M. P., Perrier, L. L., & Acquadro, C. (2005). Patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database (PROQOLID): Frequently asked questions. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(1), 12. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-12.PubMedCrossRef

11.

McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Osoba, D. (2002). A taxonomy of the uses of health-related quality-of-life instruments in cancer care and the clinical meaningfulness of the results. Medical Care, 40(6, Suppl), III31–III38. doi:10.1097/00005650-200206001-00006.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38(1), 27–36. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Patrick, D. L., & Deyo, R. A. (1989). Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Medical Care, 27(3, Suppl), S217–S232. doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Guyatt, G. H., Veldhuyzen Van Zanten, S. J., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: A taxonomy and review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 140(12), 1441–1448.PubMed

16.

Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118(8), 622–629.PubMed

17.

MacKeigan, L. D., & Pathak, D. S. (1992). Overview of health-related quality-of-life measures. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 49(9), 2236–2245.PubMed

18.

Patrick, D. L., & Chiang, Y. P. (2002). Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations. Medical Care, 38(9, Suppl II), II-14–II-25.

19.

Bowling, A. (1997). Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

20.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). (2007). Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl 1), S3–S11.

21.

Revicki, D. (2007). FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet, 369, 540–542. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60250-5.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2007). Linking measurement to rooted theory models in the PROMIS project. Medical Care, 45(10), 1008.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38(2), 175–186. doi:10.1097/00005650-200002000-00007.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 331(7524), 1064–1065. doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.CrossRef

25.

[25] Patrick DL, Chiang YP. Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations. Medical Care 2002:38 (9, Suppl. II):II14–II25

26.

Cross-classification.WordNet. Princeton University. (2006). Available at http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=cross-classification. Accessed 07 May 2008.

27.

Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205. doi:10.1023/A:1015291021312.CrossRef

28.

Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

29.

Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 59–65. doi:10.1001/jama.273.1.59.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Engel, G. E. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136. doi:10.1126/science.847460.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Sullivan, M. D., Kempen, G. I., Van Sonderen, E., & Ormel, J. (2000). Models of health-related quality of life in a population of community-dwelling Dutch elderly. Quality of Life Research, 9(7), 801–810. doi:10.1023/A:1008987709788.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Orfila, F., Ferrer, M., Lamarca, R., Tebe, C., Domingo-Salvany, A., & Alonso, J. (2006). Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: The role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions. Social Science & Medicine, 63(9), 2367–2380. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.017.CrossRef

33.

Sousa, K. H., & Kwok, O. I. (2006). Putting Wilson and Cleary to the test: Analysis of a HRQOL conceptual model using structural equation modeling. Quality of Life Research, 15, 725–737. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-3975-4.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Hays, R. D., Revicki, D., & Coyne, K. S. (2005). Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(3), 295–309. doi:10.1177/0163278705278277.CrossRef

35.

Hofer, S., Benzer, W., Alber, H., et al. (2005). Determinants of health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients: A prospective study generating a structural equation model. Psychosomatics, 46(3), 212–223. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.46.3.212.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Bickenbach, J., Kostanjsek, N., & Schneider, M. (2003). The international classification of functioning, disability and health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(11–12), 565–571. doi:10.1080/0963828031000137063.PubMed

37.

Post, M. W. M., de Witte, L. P., & Schrijvers, A. J. P. (1999). Quality of life and the ICIDH: Towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 5. doi:10.1191/026921599701532072.PubMedCrossRef

38.

McKenna, S. P., & Doward, L. C. (2004). Integrating patient-reported outcomes. Value in Health, 7(Suppl 1), S9–S12. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.7s103.x.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Kollerits, B., Grimby, G., & Stucki, G. (2007). Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 833–851. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9174-8.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Ustun, B., & Stucki, G. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218. doi:10.1080/16501970510040263.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Tennant, A. (1995). Quality of life—A measure too far? Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 54(6), 439–440. doi:10.1136/ard.54.6.439.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Oxford English Dictionary. (2008). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at http://www.oed.com/. Accessed 7 May 2008.

43.

Starfield, B. (1973). Health services research: A working model. The New England Journal of Medicine, 289(3), 132–136.PubMed

44.

Shikiar, R., & Rentz, A. M. (2004). Satisfaction with medication. An overview of conceptual, methodologic and regulatory issues. Value in Health, 7, 204–215. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.72252.x.PubMedCrossRef

45.

International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th Revision Version for 2006. Accesible at http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/. Accessed 15 May 2008.

46.

International Classification of Functioning.Disability and Health. Accesible at http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/site/onlinebrowser/icf.cfm. Accessed 15 May 2008.

47.

Streiner, D., & Normand, C. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

48.

Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

49.

Wright, J. G., & Feinstein, A. R. (1992). A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 1201–1218. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90161-F.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Ribera, A., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Alonso, J., Cascant, P., Soriano, N., & Brotons, C. (2006). Is psychometric scoring of the McNew quality of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire superior to the clinimetric scoring? A comparison of the two approaches. Quality of Life Research, 15(3), 357–365. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-2291-3.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Kaplan, R. M. (1998). Profile versus utility based measures of outcome for clinical trials. In M. J. Staquet, R. D. Hays & P. M. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. Methods and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Bowling, A. (2005). Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 342–345. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.021204.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Carr, J. A., & Higginson, I. J. (2001). Are quality of life measures patient centered? BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 322, 1357–1360. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1357.CrossRef

54.

Patel, K. K., Veenstra, D. L., & Patrick, D. L. (2003). A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value in Health, 6(5), 595–603. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65236.x.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Gill, T. M., & Feinstein, A. R. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 619–626. doi:10.1001/jama.272.8.619.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Jr., Sullivan, E., & Straus, W. L. (2006). An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(7), 715–723. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.019.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Jette, A.M., & Badley, E. (2000). Conceptual issues in the measurement of work disability. In: N. Mathiowetz & G. S. Wunderlich (Eds), Survey measurement of work disability: Summary of a workshop (pp. 4–27). Washington DC: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/html/work_disability/ch2.html. Accessed 19 July 2008.

58.

Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendívil, J., Garin, O., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., et al. (2008). The scientific committee on “patient-reported outcomes” of the IRYSS network. Development of EMPRO: A tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value in Health, 11(4), 700–708. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.x.

59.

Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., Guyatt, G., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17(2), 179–193. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Valderas, J. M., Alonso, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2008). Measuring patient-reported outcomes: Moving from clinical trials into clinical practice. The Medical Journal of Australia, 189(2), 93–94.PubMed

61.

Krumholz, H. M., Normand, S. T., Spertus, J. A., Shahian, D. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2007). Measuring performance for treating heart attacks and heart failure: The case for outcomes measurement. Health Affairs, 26(1), 75–85. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.75.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Patel, K. K., Veenstra, D. L., & Patrick, D. L. (2003). A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value Health, 6(5), 595–603.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice
verfasst von: Jose M. Valderas
Jordi Alonso
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2008
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9396-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2008

Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis

A highly significant difference in baseline characteristics: the play of chance or evidence of a more selective game?

Mapping the eight-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) to the EQ-5D utility index

Evaluation of the American version of the 30-item Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30)

Reliability across studies from the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and its subscales: a reliability generalization

Personality and EQ-5D scores among individuals with chronic conditions