nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.06.2009

Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI)

verfasst von: Deepa Rao, Seung W. Choi, David Victorson, Rita Bode, Amy Peterman, Allen Heinemann, David Cella

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Most measures of stigma are illness specific and do not allow for comparisons across conditions. As part of a study of health-related quality of life for people with neurological disorders, our team developed an instrument to assess the stigma for people with chronic illnesses.

Methods

We based item content on literature review, responses from focus groups, and cognitive interviews. We then administered the items to people with neurological disorders for psychometric testing.

Results

Five hundred eleven participants completed items of the stigma scale. Exploratory factor analysis produced two factors that were highly correlated (r = 0.81). Confirmatory factor analysis produced high standardized loadings on an overall stigma factor (0.68–0.94), with poorer loadings on the two sub-domains (−0.12 to 0.53). These results demonstrated a sufficiently unidimensional scale that corresponded with the bifactor model. Item response theory modeling suggested good model fit, and differential item functioning analyses indicated that the 24-item scale showed potential for measurement equivalence across conditions.

Conclusions

Our efforts produced a stigma scale that had promising psychometric properties. Further study can provide additional information about the SSCI and its benefit in measuring the impact of stigma across conditions.

Vorheriger Artikel Self-rated health in persons with spinal cord injury: relationship of secondary conditions, function and health status

Nächster Artikel Measuring the psychological consequences of breast cancer screening: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc.

Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738.PubMedCrossRef

Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. The American Psychologist, 54(9), 765–776. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.765.PubMedCrossRef

Jones, E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A., Markus, H., Miller, D., & Scott, R. (1984). Social stigma the psychology of marked relationships. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M., & Corrigan, P. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiative to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004.PubMedCrossRef

Sikkema, K., Kalichman, S., Hoffmann, R., Koob, J., Kelly, J., & Heckman, T. (2000). Coping strategies and emotional well-being among HIV-infected men and women experiencing AIDS-related bereavement. AIDS Care, 12(5), 613–624. doi:10.1080/095401200750003798.PubMedCrossRef

Sirey, J. A., Bruce, M. L., Alexopoulos, G. S., Perlick, D. A., Friedman, S. J., & Meyers, B. S. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 52(12), 1615–1620. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1615.

Corrigan, P., Watson, A., & Barr, L. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self esteem and self efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(9), 875–884. doi:10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875.CrossRef

Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53.CrossRef

10.

Steward, W., Herek, G. M., Ramakrishna, J., Bharat, S., Chandy, S., Wrubel, J., et al. (2008). HIV-related stigma: adapting a theoretical framework for use in India. Social Science and Medicine, 67(8), 1225–1235. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.032.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Jacoby, A. (1994). Felt versus enacted stigma: A concept revisited. Social Science and Medicine, 38(2), 269–274. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90396-4.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Link, B., Yang, L., Phelan, J., & Collins, P. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511–541.PubMed

13.

Watson, A., Corrigan, P., Larson, J., & Sells, M. (2007). Self-stigma in people with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(6), 1312–1318.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Berger, B. E., Ferrans, C. E., & Lashley, F. R. (2001). Measuring stigma in people with HIV: Psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 24, 518–529. doi:10.1002/nur.10011.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Sayles, J., Hays, R., Sarkisian, C., Mahajan, A., Spritzer, K., & Cunningham, W. (2008). Development and psychometric assessment of a multidimensional measure of internalized HIV stigma in a sample of HIV-positive adults. AIDS and Behavior, 12(5), 748–758.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Van Brakel, W. H. (2006). Measuring health-related stigma: A literature review. Psychology Health and Medicine, 11(3), 307–334. doi:10.1080/13548500600595160.CrossRef

17.

Nyblade, L. C. (2006). Measuring HIV stigma: Existing knowledge and gaps. Psychology Health and Medicine, 11(3), 335–345. doi:10.1080/13548500600595178.CrossRef

18.

Gagliardi, B. A. (1991). The impact of Duchenne muscular dystrophy on families. Orthopedic Nursing, 10, 41–49. doi:10.1097/00006416-199109000-00009.CrossRef

19.

Weaver, F. M., Giobbie-Hurder, A. G., Hughes, S. L., Smith, G., Kubal, J. D., & Ulasevich, A. (1999). Home medical equipment receipt in a home care appropriate population. Journal of Aging and Health, 11(4), 494–516. doi:10.1177/089826439901100402.PubMedCrossRef

20.

de Boer, A. G., Wijker, W., Speelman, J. D., & de Haes, J. C. (1996). Quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: development of a questionnaire. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 61(1), 70–74. doi:10.1136/jnnp.61.1.70.CrossRef

21.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., & Reeve, B. (2007). The patient reported outcomes measurement informational system (PROMIS) overview and developmental work, 2004–2006. Medical Care, 45(5), S3–S11. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.

23.

Lawrence, J., Fauerbach, J., Heinberg, L., Doctor, M., & Thombs, D. (2006). The reliability and validity of the perceived stigmatization questionnaire (PSQ) and the social comfort questionnaire (SCQ) among an adult burn survivor sample. Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 106–111. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.106.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Cramer, J., Westbrook, L., Devinsky, O., Perrine, K., Glassman, M., & Camfield, C. (1999). Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory for adolescents: The QOLIE-AD-48. Epilepsia, 40, 1114–1121. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00828.x.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Jacoby, A., Baker, G., Smith, D., Dewey, M., Chadwick, D., Jacoby, A., et al. (1993). Measuring the impact of epilepsy: The development of a novel scale. Epilepsy Research, 16(1), 83–88. doi:10.1016/0920-1211(93)90042-6.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Loring, D., Larrabee, G., Meador, K., & Lee, G. (2005). Dimensions of the epilepsy foundation concerns index. Epilepsy & Behavior, 6(3), 348–352. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.02.001.CrossRef

27.

Green, C., Kiebert, G., Murphy, C., Mitchell, J., O′Brien, M., & Burrell, A. (2003). Patients’ health-related quality of life and health state values for motor neurone disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 12, 565–574. doi:10.1023/A:1025052609818.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Cella, D., Dineen, K., Arnason, B., Reder, A., Webster, K., & Karabatsos, G. (1996). Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology, 47, 129–139.PubMed

29.

Ford, H., Gerry, E., Tennant, A., Whalley, D., Haigh, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15, 247–258. doi:10.1191/026921501673658108.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Rotstein, Z., Barak, Y., Noy, S., & Achiron, A. (2000). Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Development and validation of the ‘RAYS’ scale and comparison with the SF-36. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12(6), 511–517. doi:10.1093/intqhc/12.6.511.PubMedCrossRef

31.

DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl 1), S12–S21. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Willis, G. B. (1999). Cognitive interviewing: A “how to” guide, from the short course “reducing survey error through research on the cognitive and decision processes in surveys”. Presented at: Meeting of the American Statistical Association; Dallas, TX, USA.

33.

Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

34.

Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.

35.

Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298. doi:10.1177/0146621603027004004.CrossRef

36.

LaFrance, W. C., Kanner, A. M., & Hermann, B. (2008). Psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy. International Review of Neurobiology, 83, 347–383. doi:10.1016/S0074-7742(08)00020-2.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Alonso, J., Buron, A., Bruffaerts, R., He, Y., Posada-Villa, J., Lepine, J. P., et al. (2008). Association of perceived stigma and mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 118(4), 305–314. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01241.x.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Zubrod, C., Schneiderman, M., & Frei, E. (1960). Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 11, 7–33. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(60)90137-5.CrossRef

39.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRef

40.

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1992). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

41.

Penfield, R. (2005). DIFAS: Differential item functioning analysis system. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 150. doi:10.1177/0146621603260686.CrossRef

42.

Perez, L., Huang, J., Jansky, L., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., et al. (2007). Using focus groups to inform the Neuro-QOL measurement tool: Exploring patient-centered, health-related quality of life concepts across neurological conditions. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 39(6), 342–353. doi:10.1097/01376517-200712000-00005.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.CrossRef

44.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116.CrossRef

45.

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

46.

Lai, J. S., Crane, P. K., & Cella, D. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1179–1190. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Reise, S., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16, 19–31. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI)
verfasst von: Deepa Rao
Seung W. Choi
David Victorson
Rita Bode
Amy Peterman
Allen Heinemann
David Cella
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2009
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9475-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2009

Measuring the psychological consequences of breast cancer screening: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire

Questions never asked. Positive family outcomes of extremely premature childbirth

Are gender-associated differences in quality of life in colorectal cancer patients disease-specific?

Structure of the sense of coherence scale in a nationally representative sample: the Finnish Health 2000 survey

Measurement equivalence of osteoporosis-specific and general quality-of-life instruments in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women

Modification, translation and adaptation of questionnaires should copyright laws be observed?