Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 7/2015

01.07.2015

Relationship between socioeconomic status and quality of life in older adults: a path analysis

verfasst von: A. Bielderman, M. H. G. de Greef, W. P. Krijnen, C. P. van der Schans

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The main objective of this study was to determine the relationship between quality of life, social functioning, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, physical function, and socioeconomic status (SES) in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional design was used to examine the relationships. A sample of 193 community-dwelling older adults completed the measurements. Structural equation modeling with full information maximum likelihood in LISREL was used to evaluate the relationships between the latent variables (SES, social functioning, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, physical function, and quality of life).

Results

The path analysis exhibited significant effects of SES on physical function, social functioning, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy (γ = 0.42–0.73), and significant effects in regard to social functioning, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy on quality of life (γ = 0.27–0.61). There was no direct effect of SES on the quality of life. The model fit indices demonstrated a reasonable fit (χ 2 = 98.3, df = 48, p < 0.001), matching the relative Chi-square criterion and the RMSEA criterion. The model explained 55.5 % of the variance of quality of life.

Conclusions

The path analysis indicated an indirect effect of SES on the quality of life by social functioning, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy in community-dwelling older adults. Physical function did not have a direct effect on the quality of life. To improve the quality of life in older adults, additional focus is required on the socioeconomic psychosocial differences in the community-dwelling older population.
Vorheriger Artikel Health status and quality of life: results from a national survey in a community-dwelling sample of elderly people
Nächster Artikel Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(7), 891–901.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Barcaccia, B., Esposito, G., Matarese, M., Bertolaso, M., Elvira, M., & De Marinis, M. G. (2013). Defining quality of life: A wild-goose chase? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 185–203.
3.
Holmes, S. (2005). Assessing the quality of life: Reality or impossible dream? A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(4), 493–501.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Brown, J., Bowling, A., & Flynn, T. (2004). Models of quality of life: A taxonomy, overview and systematic review of the literature. Bristol, London: European Population Forum for Ageing Research
5.
Farquhar, M. (1995). Elderly people’s definitions of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1439–1446.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Gasper, D. (2010). Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 351–360.CrossRef
7.
WHOQOL group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.
8.
Wilhelmson, K., Andersson, C., Waern, M., & Allebeck, P. (2005). Elderly people’s perspectives on quality of life. Ageing and Society, 25(4), 585–600.CrossRef
9.
Gabriel, Z., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing and Society, 24(5), 675–691.CrossRef
10.
Netuveli, G., & Blane, D. (2008). Quality of life in older ages. British Medical Bulletin, 85, 113–126.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Ruta, D., Camfield, L., & Donaldson, C. (2007). Sen and the art of quality of life maintenance: Towards a general theory of quality of life and its causation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 397–423.CrossRef
12.
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2), 267–276.CrossRef
13.
George, L. K. (2010). Still happy after all these years: Research frontiers on subjective well-being in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(3), 331–339.CrossRef
14.
Huguet, N., Kaplan, M. S., & Feeny, D. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among elderly people: Results from the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health. Social Science and Medicine, 66(4), 803–810.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187–224.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zaninotto, P., Falaschetti, E., & Sacker, A. (2009). Age trajectories of quality of life among older adults: Results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Quality of Life Research, 18(10), 1301–1309.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Brett, C. E., Gow, A. J., Corley, J., Pattie, A., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Psychosocial factors and health as determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 505–516.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Bowling, A., Seetai, S., Morris, R., & Ebrahim, S. (2007). Quality of life among older people with poor functioning. The influence of perceived control over life. Age and Ageing, 36(3), 310–315.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Netz, Y., Wu, M., Becker, B. J., & Tenenbaum, G. (2005). Physical activity and psychological well-being in advanced age: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 272.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Garatachea, N., Molinero, O., Martínez-García, R., Jiménez-Jiménez, R., González-Gallego, J., & Márquez, S. (2009). Feelings of well being in elderly people: Relationship to physical activity and physical function. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48(3), 306–312.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Olivares, P. R., Gusi, N., Prieto, J., & Hernandez-Mocholi, M. A. (2011). Fitness and health-related quality of life dimensions in community-dwelling middle aged and older adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 117.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Chang, M., Kim, H., Shigematsu, R., Nho, H., Nishijima, T., & Tanaka, K. (2001). Functional fitness may be related to life satisfaction in older Japanese adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 53(1), 35–50.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Takata, Y., Ansai, T., Soh, I., Awano, S., Yoshitake, Y., Kimura, Y., et al. (2010). Quality of life and physical fitness in an 85-year-old population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 50(3), 272–276.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Spirduso, W. W., & Cronin, D. L. (2001). Exercise dose–response effects on quality of life and independent living in older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(6), S598–S608.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Brydon, L., Edwards, S., Mohamed-Ali, V., & Steptoe, A. (2004). Socioeconomic status and stress-induced increases in interleukin-6. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 18(3), 281–290.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Cohen, S., & Janicki-Deverts, D. (2012). Who’s stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1320–1334.CrossRef
27.
Broese van Groenou, M. I., & Van Tilburg, T. (2003). Network size and support in old age: Differentials by socio-economic status in childhood and adulthood. Ageing and Society, 23(05), 625–645.CrossRef
28.
Stringhini, S., Berkman, L., Dugravot, A., Ferrie, J. E., Marmot, M., Kivimaki, M., et al. (2012). Socioeconomic status, structural and functional measures of social support, and mortality: The British Whitehall II Cohort Study, 1985–2009. American Journal of Epidemiology, 175(12), 1275–1283.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
Savikko, N., Routasalo, P., Tilvis, R. S., Strandberg, T. E., & Pitkälä, K. (2005). Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 41(3), 223–233.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Kubzansky, L. D., Subramanian, S., Kawachi, I., Fay, M. E., Soobader, M., & Berkman, L. F. (2005). Neighborhood contextual influences on depressive symptoms in the elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162(3), 253–260.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Mair, C., Roux, A. D., & Galea, S. (2008). Are neighbourhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A review of evidence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(11), 940–946.PubMed
32.
Stimpson, J. P., Ju, H., Raji, M. A., & Eschbach, K. (2007). Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(2), 215–222.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Koster, A., Bosma, H., van Groenou, M. I. B., Kempen, G. I., Penninx, B. W., van Eijk, J. T., et al. (2006). Explanations of socioeconomic differences in changes in physical function in older adults: Results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. BMC Public Health, 6(1), 244.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
Broese van Groenou, M. I., Deeg, D. J., & Penninx, B. W. (2003). Income differentials in functional disability in old age: Relative risks of onset, recovery, decline, attrition and mortality. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 15(2), 174–183.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
36.
Thomas, S., Reading, J., & Shephard, R. J. (1992). Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 17(4), 338–345.PubMed
37.
Statistics Netherlands. (1989). Health interview survey in the Netherlands. Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.
38.
Ruwaard, D., Kramers, P., Van den Berg Jeths, A., & Achterberg, P. (1993). Public health status and forecasts. The health status of the Dutch population over the period 1950–2010. The Hague, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
39.
Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & Mental Health, 7(3), 186–194.CrossRef
40.
Bowling, A. (2009). The psychometric properties of the older people’s quality of life questionnaire, compared with the CASP-19 and the WHOQOL-OLD. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2009, 298950.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
41.
Gierveld, J. D. J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582–598.CrossRef
42.
Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., von Renteln Kruse, W., Beck, J. C., et al. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503–513.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Kempen, G., & Van Eijk, L. (1995). The psychometric properties of the SSL12-I, a short scale for measuring social support in the elderly. Social Indicators Research, 35(3), 303–312.CrossRef
44.
Bouma, J., Ranchor, A. V., Sanderman, R., & Van Sonderen, E. (2012). Assessment of symptoms of depression by means of the CES-D: A manual. Groningen: Stichting Drukkerij Regenboog.
45.
Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., & Allen, N. B. (1997). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12(2), 277.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671.CrossRef
47.
Bosscher, R. J., & Smit, J. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the general self-efficacy scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(3), 339–343.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7, 129–161.
49.
Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. (1991). The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39(2), 142.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Brown, A. F., Ettner, S. L., Piette, J., Weinberger, M., Gregg, E., Shapiro, M. F., et al. (2004). Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: A conceptual framework and review of the literature. Epidemiologic Reviews, 26(1), 63–77.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457.CrossRef
53.
Allison, P. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. (paper 312-2012).
54.
Wheaton, D. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136.CrossRef
55.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education, Allyn & Bacon.
56.
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824.CrossRef
57.
Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898.CrossRef
58.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
59.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.PubMedCrossRef
60.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130.CrossRef
61.
Ahuvia, A. C. (2002). Individualism/collectivism and cultures of happiness: A theoretical conjecture on the relationship between consumption, culture and subjective well-being at the national level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 23–36.CrossRef
62.
Schenk, L., Meyer, R., Behr, A., Kuhlmey, A., & Holzhausen, M. (2013). Quality of life in nursing homes: results of a qualitative resident survey. Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2929–2938.PubMedCrossRef
63.
White, S. M., Wójcicki, T. R., & McAuley, E. (2009). Physical activity and quality of life in community dwelling older adults. Health and Quality of life outcomes, 7(10).
64.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
65.
Gallo, L. C., Bogart, L. M., Vranceanu, A., & Matthews, K. A. (2005). Socioeconomic status, resources, psychological experiences, and emotional responses: A test of the reserve capacity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 386.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Relationship between socioeconomic status and quality of life in older adults: a path analysis
verfasst von
A. Bielderman
M. H. G. de Greef
W. P. Krijnen
C. P. van der Schans
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0898-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Quality of Life Research 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Health perceptions and symptom burden in primary care: measuring health using audio computer-assisted self-interviews

Erratum

Erratum to: Living with orofacial conditions: psychological distress and quality of life in adults affected with Treacher Collins syndrome, cherubism, or oligodontia/ectodermal dysplasia—a comparative study

OriginalPaper

Valuing EQ-5D health states for Sri Lanka

Brief Communication

Future orientation and health quality of life in primary care: vitality as a mediator

OriginalPaper

Do health preferences contradict ordering of EQ-5D labels?

OriginalPaper

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) among patients with chronic constipation