Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 7/2018

22.03.2018

PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores

verfasst von: Ron D. Hays, Karen L. Spritzer, Benjamin D. Schalet, David Cella

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0–10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain. This paper describes the development of physical and mental health summary scores for the PROMIS-29 v2.0.

Method

We conducted factor analyses of PROMIS-29 scales on data collected from two internet panels (n = 3000 and 2000).

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a physical health factor defined by physical function, pain (interference and intensity), and ability to participate in social roles and activities, and a mental health factor defined primarily by emotional distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms). Reliabilities for these two summary scores were 0.98 (physical health) and 0.97 (mental health). Correlations of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 physical and mental health summary scores with chronic conditions and other health-related quality of life measures were consistent with a priori hypotheses.

Conclusions

This study develops and provides preliminary evidence supporting the reliability and validity of PROMIS-29 v2.0 physical and mental health summary scores that can be used in future studies to assess impacts of health care interventions and track changes in health over time. Further evaluation of these and alternative summary measures is recommended.
Vorheriger Artikel Importance ratings on patient-reported outcome items for survivorship care: comparison between pediatric cancer survivors, parents, and clinicians
Nächster Artikel The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Young, S., et al. (2010). Initial item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Hinami, K., Smith, J., Deamant, C., DuBeshler, K., & Trick, W. (2015). When do patient-reported outcome measures inform readmission risk? Journal of Hospital Medicine, 10, 294–300.CrossRefPubMed
3.
DeSalvo, K. B., Bloser, N., Reynolds, K., He, J., & Muntner, P. J. (2006). Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(3), 267–275.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Han, P. K. J., Lee, M., Reeve, B. B., Mariotto, A. B., Wang, Z., Hays, R. D., et al. (2012). Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 43, 527–539.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Pilkonis, P. A., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D. (2010). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19, 125–136.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Fries, J. F., & Krishnan, E. (2013). Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the patient-reported outcomes measurement and information system (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short-form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74(1), 104–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Hinchcliff, M. E., Beaumont, J. L., Carns, M. A., Podlusky, S., Thavarajah, K., Varga, et al. (2015). Longitudinal evaluation of PROMIS-29 and FACIT-dyspnea short forms in systemic sclerosis. Journal of Rheumatology, 42(1), 64–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Katz, P., Pedro, S., & Michaud, K. (2017). Performance of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care and Research, 69(8), 1312–1321.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Gandek, B., Bruce, B., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2014). The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 516–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Lai, J.-S., Cella, D., Choi, S., et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10), S20-S27.CrossRefPubMedCentral
12.
13.
Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Hahn, E. A., DeWalt, D. A., Bode, R. K., et al. (2014). New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants. Health Psychology, 33(5), 490–499.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., et al. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33(6), 781–792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Hays, R. D., Alonso, J., & Coons, S. J. (1998). Possibilities for summarizing health-related quality of life when using a profile instrument. In M. Staquet, R. Hays & P. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice (pp. 143–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Farivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 health survey, V. 1. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Hays, R. D., Marshall, G. N., Wang, E. Y. I., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). Four-year cross-lagged associations between physical and mental health in the medical outcomes study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 441–449.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Hays, R. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1990). The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients. Psychological Assessment, 2, 22–30.CrossRef
20.
Carle, A. C., Riley, W., Hays, R. D., et al. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) adult domain framework using item response theory scores. Medical Care, 53, 894–900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
22.
Butt, Z., Peipert, J., Webster, K., Chen, C., & Cella, D. (2013). General population norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-kidney symptoms index (FKSI). Cancer, 119(2), 429–437.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Boyle, M., et al. (1995). Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 490–502.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18, 873–880.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Revicki, D. A., Kawata, A. K., Harnam, N., Chen, W.-H., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D. (2009). Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample. Quality of Life Research, 18, 783–791.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRef
29.
Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
30.
Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70.CrossRef
31.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
32.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
33.
Mosier, C. I. (1943). On the reliability of a weighted composite. Psychometrika, 8(3), 161–168.CrossRef
34.
Hays, R. D., Revicki, D. A., Feeny, D., Fayers, P., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2016). Using linear equating to map PROMIS global health items and the PROMIS-29 V. 2 Profile measure to the health utilities index—mark 3. Pharmacoeconomics, 34, 1015–1022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Hays, R. D., Schalet, B. D., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2017). Two-item PROMIS global physical and mental health scales. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1, 2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Barile, J. P., Reeve, B. B., Smith, A. W., Zack, M. M., Mitchell, S. A., Kobau, R., et al. (2013). Monitoring population health for healthy people 2020: Evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® global health, CDC healthy days, and satisfaction with life instruments. Quality of Life Research, 22(6), 1201–1211.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Simon, G. E., Revicki, D. A., Grothaus, L., et al. (1998). SF-36 summary scores: Are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36, 567–572.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Craig, B. M., Reeve, B. B., Brown, P. M., Cella, D., Hays, R. D., Lipscomb, J., Pickard, A. S., & Revicki, D. A. (2014). US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. Value in Health, 17(8), 846–853.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Hanmer, J., Cella, D., Feeny, D., Fischhoff, B., Hays, R. D., Hess, R., et al. (2017). Selection of key health domains from PROMIS® for a generic preference-based scoring system. Quality of Life Research, 26, 3377–3385CrossRef
42.
Hanmer, J., Feeny, D., Fischoff, B., Hays, R. D., Hess, R., Pilkonis, P., et al. (2015). The PROMIS of QALYs. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores
verfasst von
Ron D. Hays
Karen L. Spritzer
Benjamin D. Schalet
David Cella
Publikationsdatum
22.03.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Quality of Life Research 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Brief Communication

Activity pacing: moving beyond taking breaks and slowing down

OriginalPaper

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D-CHN): a school-based study in China

OriginalPaper

People in states worse than dead according to the EQ-5D UK value set: would they rather be dead?

OriginalPaper

Coping mediates the relationship between sense of coherence and mental quality of life in patients with chronic illness: a cross-sectional study

OriginalPaper

Agreement between retrospectively and contemporaneously collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hip and knee replacement patients

Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)

Measurement invariance, the lack thereof, and modeling change