Skip to main content
Log in

The limits to designed orders: Authority under “distributed knowledge” conditions

  • Article
  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the argument, put forward by modern management writers and, in a somewhat different guise by Austrian economists, that authority is not a viable mechanism of coordination in the presence of “distributed knowledge” We define authority and distributed knowledge and argue that authority is compatible with distributed knowledge. Moreover, it is not clear on theoretical grounds how distributed knowledge impacts on economic organization. An implication is that the Austrian argument that designed orders are strongly constrained by the Hayekian dispersed knowledge (Hayek, Kirzner, Sautet) is less decisive than it has usually been taken to be. The positive flipside of this argument is that Austrians confront an exciting research agenda in theorizing how distributed knowledge impacts economic organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann, R. (1976). Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics, 4, 1236–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. (1989). Comment on Joseph Farrell, Information and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, P., & Joseph, F. (1990). Decentralization, duplication, and delay. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 803–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusoni, S., Andrea, P., & Keith, P. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. In: The Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives in Business and Management, Vol II. N. J. Foss (ed.) 1999. London: Routledge.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., & David, P. (1997). Markets in the Firm: A Market Process Approach to Management. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

  • Foss, N. J. (1999). The Use of Knowledge in Firms. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155, 458–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J. (2001). Misesian ownership and coasian authority in hayekian settings: The case of the knowledge economy. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, K., & Nicolai, J. F. (2003). Authority in the context of distributed knowledge. DRUID Working Paper.

  • Garicano, L. (2000). Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 874–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbrandy, J. D. (1998). Bisimulations on planet kripke. Ph.d.-dissertation, Institute for Logic, Language and Computing, Amsterdam University.

  • Granstrand, O., Pari, P., & Keith, P. (1997). Multitechnology corporations: Why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ capabilities. California Management Review, 39(4), 8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. (1997). Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management and Governance, 1, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. (2002). Cognitive failures’ and combinative failures. Journal of Management and Governance, 6, 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J. Y., & Yoram, M. (1990). Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 37, 549–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, T. H., & Gary, J. M. (1985). A social choice perspective on expertise and authority in bureaucracy. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 611–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995). Firm, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. von (1935). Socialist calculation: the state of the debate. In idem, 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayek, F. A. von (1945). The use of knowledge in society. In idem, 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayek, F. A. von (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1998). Economics and Utopia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & William, H. M. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. in L. Werin and H. Wijkander, (eds.), 1992. Contract Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Kaldor, N. (1934). The Equilibrium of the firm. Economic Journal, 44, 60–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1992). The Meaning of the Market Process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. G. (1996). Economic calculation and the limits of organization. Review of Austrian Economics, 9, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. 1964 reprint. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

  • Langlois, R. N. (1992). Transaction-cost economics in real time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (1995). Do firms plan? Constitutional Political Economy.

  • Langlois, R. N., & Nicolai, J. F. (1999). Capabilities and governance: the rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization. KYKLOS, 52, 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1985). Rivalry and Central Planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Herbert, A. S. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marengo, L. (1995). Structure, competence, and learning in organizations. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 6, 454–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & John, R. (1992). Economics, Organization, and Management. Prentice-Hall.

  • Miller, G. (1992). Managerial Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, A. P. (1993). Knowledge and internal organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 21, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelikan, P. (1988). Can the imperfect innovation system of capitalism be outperformed? in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete, (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (2000). Costly and bounded rationality in individual and team decision making. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 623–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. Economic Journal, 82, 883–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. (1962). Man, Economy, and State. Princeton: van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanié, B. (1997). The Economics of Contracts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautet, F. (2000). An Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1951). A formal theory of the employment relationship. In idem. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, W. E., & James, M. P. (2001). A model of distributed knowledge and action in complex systems. Decision Support Systems, 31, 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1956). Authority and power in identical organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 62.

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Tunzelman, G. N. von (2000). Complexity and the functions of the firm: breadth and depth. Research Policy, 29, 805–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Economic and Social Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1970). Corporate Control and Business Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. J. (2001). The knowledge problem, entrepreneurial discovery, and austrian market process theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 91, 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

JEL Codes B53, L20

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foss, K., Foss, N.J. The limits to designed orders: Authority under “distributed knowledge” conditions. Rev Austrian Econ 19, 261–274 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-9248-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-9248-9

Keywords

Navigation