nach oben

Review of Accounting Studies

Erschienen in:

01.03.2007

Valuation of loss firms in a knowledge-based economy

verfasst von: Masako Darrough, Jianming Ye

Erschienen in: Review of Accounting Studies | Ausgabe 1/2007

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Recent research in accounting has documented a substantial increase in the number of loss firms. Existing theories on the valuation of loss firms are based on adaptation/abandonment options or limited liability, assuming that these firms are operationally distressed. In this paper, we show that many loss firms do not fit this stereotype and identify the primary value drivers of this new type of loss firms. Our analysis helps resolve the puzzling negative relation between earnings and market value documented in prior research. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of “hidden assets” or intangibles in the study of loss firms.

Vorheriger Artikel Underwriter choice and earnings management: evidence from seasoned equity offerings

Nächster Artikel Asymmetric timeliness tests of accounting conservatism

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Based on income before extraordinary items (item #18 in Compustat).

To be precise, we mean by a “loss firm” a firm that posts a negative earning in a particular year (i.e., firm-year observation).

In fact, Collins, Maydew, and Weiss (1997) document that the value relevance of earnings in general has declined (while that of book values has increased) over time due, among others, to the increasing frequency of losses. See also Basu (1997); Elliott and Hanna (1996); and Hayn (1995).

See Hayn (1995), Berger, Ofek, and Swary (1996), Collins et al. (1999), Core and Schrand (1999), and Wysocki (2003).

Hand (2003) documents a similar “nonlinear” relation for Internet stocks.

Firms with positive profits have survived for 6.33 years on average.

A similar observation was made by Joos and Plesko (2005). They document that firms with “persistent” losses have become more numerous and show that these persistent losses are increasingly caused by large R&D outlays.

Hillegeist, Keating, Cram, and Lundstedt (2004) report that the overall corporate bankruptcy rate fluctuate with business cycles, but ranged from .48% to 2.25% for the period 1980 to 2000. There is, however, a substantial variation across industries.

Because total assets are less sensitive to current losses than BVE, the effect of scaling for loss firms is less severe.

If and when the bias reverses in the future, the numbers will be biased upward.

In an excellent discussion on conservative accounting, Zhang (2000) uses simulation to show that such a phenomenon is possible.

Of course, from the second year on, we need to consider the impact of amortization of capitalized R&D expenditures (Kothari, Laguerre, & Leone, 2002; Lev & Sougiannis, 1996, 1999). Capitalization, however, requires one to use a long history of data and to specify capitalization rates. Since loss firms tend to be younger, the data requirement would reduce the sample substantially. For these reasons, we simplify our approach by using the linear specification (8).

See the discussion of big bath in Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) and Kirschenheiter and Melumad (1998). Francis, Hanna, and Vincent (1996) examine the issue of earnings management through discretionary asset write-offs. Another possible motive for taking a large write-off is top management’s desire to increase their bonuses (Healy, 1985).

See Bartov, Mohanram, and Seethamraju (2001) for valuation of internet firms. Since they often do not have profits, investors tend to rely on sales in valuing these firms.

The cost of developing a new drug has become more expensive over time. DiMasi, Hansen, and Grabowski (2003) estimate that the average R&D cost of a new drug increased from $231 million in 1987 to $802 million in 2000.

For example, Celgene states in their 2002 annual report: “We have sustained losses in each year since our inception as an independent biopharmaceutical company in 1986.” Their operation has been sustained partially by product sales, research contracts, and license payments, but mostly by the proceeds from an IPO in 1987, an SEO in 2000, and licensing agreements, such as the one with Novartis, for the development of new drugs.

We do not use measures such as Altman’s Z-score, since they are designed to predict a firm’s probability of bankruptcy in the future and moreover contain price and earnings. The analysis containing other variables of Altman’s Z produced coefficient estimates that are insignificant.

Table 1 partitions firms by beginning book values, while Table 2 Panels A, B by ending BVE. Therefore, the number of firms in each BVE category is similar but not identical.

The R&D expenditures for 1973 and 1974 are not comparable to those for other years, since the R&D expensing requirement became effective in 1975.

The two largest industries, but with few loss firms and low RDI, are depository institutions (SIC 60) and electric, gas, and sanitary services (49), both of which have been highly regulated.

Although we do not report the details, we also carry out our analysis using capitalized R&D (Lev & Sougiannis, 1996). The results are essentially the same.

Because Eq. 9 is scaled by beginning total assets, SGR in (9) is multiplied by A _t-1.

We do not include dividends since loss firms rarely pay dividends.

Another difference is that CPX includes dividends in earnings. However, since loss firms pay few dividends, this difference in definition does not materially affect the result.

Empirically, it can be shown that the number of shares is approximately proportional to the square root of market values.

The coefficients are significant at 10% for firms with BVE > $10 million and at 1% for firms with BVE ≤ $10 million, respectively.

Controlling for firms with special items implies that the regression coefficient is determined by the firms without special items. Thus, it must be the case that the firms that do not have special items have more negative relation.

The t-ratio (untabulated) for testing that ${\gamma_{42}=1}$ of our regression equation is 2.20 for Model 5 and 3.93 for Model 7 for firms with BVE > $10 million.

These researchers have used the relative-pricing-error (RPE) method. The SPRE is the symmetrized version of RPE so that the estimate is independent of the direction of price deviation.

Barth, M., Beaver, W., & Landsman, W. (1998). Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(1), 1–34.CrossRef

Barth, M., & Kallapur, S. (1996). The effects of cross-sectional scale differences on regression results in empirical accounting research. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 527–567.CrossRef

Bartov, E., Mohanram, P., & Seethamraju, C. (2001). Valuation of internet stocks – An IPO perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(2), 321–346.CrossRef

Beaver, W., & Ryan, S. (2005). Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2–3), 269–309.CrossRef

Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37.CrossRef

Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., & Swary, I. (1996). Investor valuation of the abandonment option. Journal of Financial Economics, 42, 257–287.CrossRef

Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings, adaptation, and firm value. The Accounting Review, 72, 187–215.

Chandra, U., Wasley, E., & Waymire, G. (2004). Income conservatism in the U.S. technology sector. Simon School Working Paper No. FR 04–01.

Collins, D. W., Maydew, E., & Weiss, I. (1997). Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 38–67.

Collins, D. W., Pincus, M., & Xie, H. (1999). Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book value of equity. The Accounting Review, 74, 29–61.

Core, J., & Schrand, C. (1999). The effect of accounting-based covenants on equity valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27, 1–34.CrossRef

DiMasi, J., Hansen, R., & Grabowski, H. (2003). The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 151–185.CrossRef

Elliott, J., & Hanna, D. (1996). Repeated accounting write-offs and information content of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 135–155.CrossRef

Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607–636.CrossRef

Feltham, G., & Ohlson, J. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 689–731.

Francis, J., Hanna, D., & Vincent, L. (1996). Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(Suppl.), 117–134.CrossRef

Francis, J., Olsson, P., & Oswald, D. (2000). Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 45–70.CrossRef

Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows, and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287–320.CrossRef

Hand, J. (2003). Profits, losses, and the nonlinear pricing of internet stocks. In J. Hand & B. Lev (Eds.), Intangible assets: Values, measures, and risks, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

Hayn, C. (1995). The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 125–153.CrossRef

Healy, P. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85–107.CrossRef

Hillegeist, S., Keating, E., Cram, D., & Lundstedt, K. (2004). Assessing the probability of bankruptcy. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 5–34.CrossRef

Joos, P., & Plesko, G. (2005). Valuing loss firms. The Accounting Review, 80(3), 847–870.

Kaplan, S., & Ruback, R. (1995). The valuation of cash flow forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1059–1093.CrossRef

Kirschenheiter, M., & Melumad, N. (1998). Can big bath and earnings smoothing co-exist as equilibrium financial reporting strategies? Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 761–796.CrossRef

Klein, A., & Marquardt, C. (2006). Fundamentals of accounting losses. The Accounting Review, 81(1), 179–206.

Kothari, S., Laguerre, T., & Leone, A. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies, 7, 355–382.CrossRef

Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107–139.CrossRef

Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1999). Penetrating the book-to-market black box: The R&D effect. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(3/4), 419–450.CrossRef

Lev, B., Nissim, D., & Thomas, J. (2007). On the informational usefulness of R&D capitalization and amortization. In S. Zambon, & G. Marzo (Eds.), Visualising intangibles: Measuring and reporting in the knowledge economy. Ashgate Publishing: Aldershot, UK.

Nakamura, L. (2003). The rise in gross private investment in intangible assets since 1978. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

Nissim, D., & Penman, S. (2001). Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(1), 109–154.CrossRef

Ohlson, J. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687.CrossRef

Penman, S., & Sougiannis, T. (1998). Theodore a comparison of dividend, cash flow, and earnings approaches to equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(3), 343–383.

Penman, S., & Zhang, X. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237–255.

Pope, P., & Walker, M. (1999). International differences in the timeliness, conservatism and classification of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(3), 53–87.CrossRef

Watts, R. (2003a). Conservatism in accounting Part II: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 287–301.

Watts, R. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting Part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 207–221.

Wysocki, P. (2003). Real options and the informativeness of segment disclosures. Working Paper, MIT.

Ye, J. (2006). Price models and the value relevance of accounting information. Working Paper, Baruch College.

Zhang, X. (2000). Conservative accounting and equity valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 125–149.CrossRef

Titel: Valuation of loss firms in a knowledge-based economy
verfasst von: Masako Darrough
Jianming Ye
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2007
Verlag: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Erschienen in: Review of Accounting Studies / Ausgabe 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1380-6653
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7136
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9022-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2007

Underwriter choice and earnings management: evidence from seasoned equity offerings

Demand for the truth in principal–agent relationships

Managerial discretion and the economic determinants of the disclosed volatility parameter for valuing ESOs

Asymmetric timeliness tests of accounting conservatism

Performance measurement for investment decisions under capital constraints