Skip to main content
Log in

Regulating Service Quality: A Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the major insights of the economics literature regarding the design of service quality regulation in public utility industries. The focus is on generic service quality issues of primary relevance in the industries, which include the electricity, telecommunications, and water industries. The instruments that public utility regulators commonly employ and the manner in which the regulators employ the instruments to secure desirable levels of service quality are emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Abel M. Clements (2001) ArticleTitle“Entry Under Asymmetric Regulation” Review of Industrial Organization 19 IssueID2 227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ai S. Martinez D. Sappington (2004) ArticleTitle“Incentive Regulation and Service Quality in the U.S. Telecommunications Industry”. Journal of Regulatory Economics 26 IssueID3 263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Akerlof (1970) ArticleTitle“The Market for ‘Lemons’: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 IssueID3 488–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, B. 2001. “Price Cap Review and Related Issues”. Direct Testimony Before the Canadian Radio–-Television and Telecommunications Commission in CRTC 2001–37 (August 20).

  • E. Amit (1981) ArticleTitle“On Quality and Price Regulation Under Competition and Under Monopoly” Southern Economic Journal 47 IssueID4 1056–1062

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Aoki T. Prusa (1997) ArticleTitle“Sequential versus Simultaneous Choice with Endogenous Quality” International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 IssueID1 103–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., and D. Sappington. 2005. “Recent Developments in the Theory of Regulation.” In The Handbook of Industrial Organization, edited by M. Armstrong and R. Porter. Elsevier Science Publishers, forthcoming.

  • E. Auriol (1998) ArticleTitle“Deregulation and Quality” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 IssueID2 169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Bagwell M. Riordan (1991) ArticleTitle“High and Declining Prices Signal Product Quality” American Economic Review 81 IssueID1 224–239

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Banerjee (2003) ArticleTitle“Does Incentive Regulation “Cause” Degradation of Retail Telephone Service Quality?” Information Economics and Policy 15 IssueID2 243–269

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Baron (1981) ArticleTitle“Price Regulation, Quality, and Asymmetric Information” American Economic Review 71 IssueID1 212–222

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Baumol (1984) ArticleTitle“Toward a Theory of Public Enterprise” Atlantic Economic Journal 12 IssueID1 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • T. R. Beard D. Kaserman J. Mayo (2001) ArticleTitle“Regulation, Vertical Integration, and Sabotage” Journal of Industrial Economics 49 IssueID3 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Berg J. Lynch (1992) ArticleTitle“The Measurement and Encouragement of Telephone Service Quality” Telecommunications Policy 16 IssueID3 210–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., and R. Willig. 1996. The Scope of Competition in Telecommunications. Monograph prepared for the AEI Studies in Telecommunications Deregulation.

  • D. Besanko S. Donnenfeld L. White (1987) ArticleTitle“Monopoly and Quality Distortion: Effects and Remedies” Quarterly Journal of Economics 52 IssueID4 743–768

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Besanko S. Donnenfeld L. White (1988) ArticleTitle“The Multiproduct Firm, Quality Choice, and Regulation” Journal of Industrial Economics 36 IssueID4 411–430

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Blouin (2003) ArticleTitle“Quality Undersupply and Oversupply” Journal of Economic Theory 109 IssueID1 130–139

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Branco (1997) ArticleTitle“The Design of Multidimensional Auctions” Rand Journal of Economics 28 IssueID1 63–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, A., and A. Galetovic. 2003. “Vertical Integration and Sabotage in Regulated Industries”. Princeton University mimeo.

  • P. Calcott (2004) ArticleTitle“Government Warnings and the Information Provided by Safety Regulation” International Review of Law and Economics 24 IssueID1 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Champsaur J. Rochet (1989) ArticleTitle“Multiproduct Duopolists” Econometrica 57 IssueID3 533–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Che (1993) ArticleTitle“Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions” Rand Journal of Economics 24 IssueID4 668–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. 2001. “Local Telephone Quality of Service: The Impact of Regulation and Competition”. Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University.

  • M. Clements (2004) ArticleTitle“Local Telephone Quality-of-Service: A Framework and Empirical Evidence” Telecommunications Policy 28 IssueID5–6 413–426

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Clements V. Witkind-Davis (1998) ArticleTitle“Recent Developments in Telecommunications Service Quality Regulation” NRRI Quarterly Bulletin 19 IssueID3 269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Constantatos S. Perrakis (1998) ArticleTitle“Minimum Quality Standards, Entry, and the Timing of the Quality Decision” Journal of Regulatory Economics 13 IssueID1 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of European Energy Regulators. 2001. Quality of Electricity Supply: Initial Benchmarking on Actual Levels, Standards and Regulatory Strategies. Report of the Working Group on Quality of Electricity Supply.

  • C. Crampes A. Hollander (1995) ArticleTitle“Duopoly and Quality Standards” European Economic Review 39 IssueID1 71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R. 2003. “Costly Exercises in Futility: Breaking Up Firms to Increase Competition”. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Publication 03–32.

  • R. Crandall J. G. Sidak (2002) ArticleTitle“Is Structural Separation of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Necessary for Competition?” Yale Journal on Regulation 19 IssueID2 335–411

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Crémer M. De Rycke A. Grimaud (1997) ArticleTitle“Service Quality, Competition, and Regulatory Policies in the Postal Sector” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11 IssueID1 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Crémer P. Rey J. Tirole (2000) ArticleTitle“Connectivity in the Commercial Internet” Journal of Industrial Economics 48 IssueID4 433–472

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Crew P. Kleindorfer J. Sumpter (2004) “Bringing Competition to Telecommunications by Divesting the RBOCs” M. A. Crew M. Spiegel (Eds) In Obtaining the Best from Regulation and Competition Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cripps N. Ireland (1994) ArticleTitle“The Design of Auctions and Tenders with Quality Thresholds: The Symmetric Case” Economic Journal 104 IssueID423 316–326

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Dalen (1997) ArticleTitle“Regulation of Quality and the Ratchet Effect: Does Unverifiability Hurt the Regulator?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11 IssueID2 139–155

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Davis (2000) ArticleTitle“Acting on Performance-Based Regulation” The Electricity Journal 13 IssueID4 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraja, G., and A. Iozzi. 2004. “Bigger and Better: A Dynamic Regulatory Mechanism for Optimum Quality”. University of York mimeo.

  • J. Demski D. Sappington (1991) ArticleTitle“Resolving Double Moral Hazard Problems with Buyout Agreements” Rand Journal of Economics 22 IssueID2 232–240

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Deneckere R. P. McAfee (1996) ArticleTitle“Damaged Goods” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 5 IssueID2 149–174

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Ecchia L. Lambertini (1997) ArticleTitle“Minimum Quality Standards and Collusion” Journal of Industrial Economics 45 IssueID1 101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Economides (1998) ArticleTitle“The Incentive for Non-Price Discrimination by an Input Monopolist” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 IssueID(3),(May) 271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Farrell (2003) “Integration and Independent Innovation on a Network” Competition Policy Center Working Paper No. CPC03–37 University of California Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Farrell M. Katz (2000) ArticleTitle“Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Innovation in Systems Markets” Journal of Industrial Economics 48 IssueID4 413–432

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Fieseler T. Kittsteiner B. Moldovanu (2003) ArticleTitle“Partnerships, Lemons, and Efficient Trade” Journal of Economic Theory 113 IssueID2 223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, S., and P. Zimmerman. 2004. “Does Allowing the Bells to Offer InterLATA Long-Distance Service Affect Entry into Local Telephony?” Loyola College - Maryland mimeo.

  • O. Foros H. Kind L. Sorgard (2002) ArticleTitle“Access Pricing, Quality Degradation, and Foreclosure in the Internet” Journal of Regulatory Economics 22 IssueID1 59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gal-Or (1983) ArticleTitle“Quality and Quantity Competition” Bell Journal of Economics 14 IssueID2 590–600

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Gehrig P. Jost (1995) ArticleTitle“Quacks, Lemons, and Self-Regulation: A Welfare Analysis” Journal of Regulatory Economics 7 IssueID3 309–325

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gupta R. Romano (1998) ArticleTitle“Monitoring the Principal with Multiple Agents” Rand Journal of Economics 29 IssueID2 427–442

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Hart A. Shleifer R. Vishny (1997) ArticleTitle“The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 IssueID4 1127–1161

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hausman J. G. Sidak (1999) ArticleTitle“A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Mandatory Unbundling of Telecommunications Networks” Yale Journal on Regulation 109 IssueID3 417–505

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Holmstrom P. Milgrom (1991) ArticleTitle“Multi-Task Principal-Agent Analysis: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership and Job Design” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7 IssueID1 26–52

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Holt (2003) “Utility Service Quality–-Telecommunications, Electricity, Water” Public Utilities Research Center Report University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, M. 2001. “Market Concentration and Incentives to Discriminate Against Rivals in Network Industries”. University of Florida mimeo.

  • Jamison, M. 2002. “Network Externalities, Mergers, and Industry Concentration”. University of Florida mimeo.

  • R. Kihlstrom D. Levhari (1977) ArticleTitle“Quality, Regulation, and Efficiency” Kyklos 30 IssueID2 214–234

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kihlstrom M. Riordan (1984) ArticleTitle“Advertising as a Signal” Journal of Political Economy 92 IssueID3 427–450

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim C. Jung (1995) ArticleTitle“Regulating a Multi-Product Monopolist” Journal of Regulatory Economics 8 IssueID3 299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Kluger (1989) ArticleTitle“Implications of Quality Standard Regulation for Multiproduct Monopoly Pricing” Managerial and Decision Economics 10 IssueID1 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kolstad T. Ulen G. Johnson (1990) ArticleTitle“Ex Post Liability for Harm vs Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements?” American Economic Review 80 IssueID4 888–901

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Kondaurova D. Weisman (2003) ArticleTitle“Incentives for Non-Price Discrimination” Information Economics and Policy 15 IssueID2 147–171

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kridel D. Sappington D. Weisman (1996) ArticleTitle“The Effects of Incentive Regulation in the Telecommunications Industry: A Survey” Journal of Regulatory Economics 9 IssueID3 269–306

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Laffont E. Maskin (1987) ArticleTitle“Monopoly with Asymmetric Information about Quality: Behavior and Regulation” European Economic Review 31 IssueID1,2 483–489

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Laffont J. Tirole (1991) “Provision of Quality and Power of Incentive Schemes in Regulated Industries” J. Gabszewicz A. Mas-Colell. (Eds) Equilibrium Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics Cambridge University Press Cambridge 161–193

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Laffont J. Tirole (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation The MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Laffont J. Tirole (2000) Competition in Telecommunications The MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lee (1997) ArticleTitle“A Note on Regulating a Multiproduct Monopolist” Journal of Regulatory Economics 12 IssueID3 311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Leland (1979) ArticleTitle“Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards” Journal of Political Economy 87 IssueID6 1328–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lewis D. Sappington (1991) ArticleTitle“Incentives for Monitoring Quality” Rand Journal of Economics 22 IssueID3 370–384

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lewis D. Sappington (1992) ArticleTitle“Incentives for Conservation and Quality-Improvement by Public Utilities” American Economic Review 82 IssueID5 1321–1340

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Loeb W. Magat (1979) ArticleTitle“A Decentralized Method for Utility Regulation” Journal of Law and Economics 22 IssueID2 399–401

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lutz T. Lyon J. Maxwell (2000) ArticleTitle“Quality Leadership when Regulatory Standards are Forthcoming” Journal of Industrial Economics 48 IssueID3 331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lynch T. Buzas S. Berg (1994) ArticleTitle“Regulatory Measurement and Evaluation of Telephone Service Quality” Management Science 40 IssueID2 169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ma J. Burgess (1993) ArticleTitle“Quality, Competition, Welfare, and Regulation” Journal of Economics 58 IssueID2 153–173

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Mahenc V. Meunier (2003) ArticleTitle“Forward Markets and Signals of Quality” Rand Journal of Economics 34 IssueID3 478–494

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Mandy (2000) ArticleTitle“Killing the Goose that Laid the Golden Egg: Only the Data Know Whether Sabotage Pays” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17 IssueID2 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandy, D. 2001. “Price and Vertical Control Policies for a Vertically Integrated Upstream Monopolist When Sabotage is Costly”. University of Missouri mimeo.

  • Mandy, D., and D. Sappington. 2004. “Incentives for Sabotage in Vertically-Related Industries”. University of Missouri mimeo.

  • A. Manelli D. Vincent (1995) ArticleTitle“Optimal Procurement Mechanisms” Econometrica 63 IssueID3 591–620

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maxwell (1998) ArticleTitle“Minimum Quality Standards as a Barrier to Innovation” Economics Letters 58 IssueID3 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Milgrom J. Roberts (1986) ArticleTitle“Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality” Journal of Political Economy 94 IssueID4 796–821

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mussa S. Rosen (1978) ArticleTitle“Monopoly and Product Quality” Journal of Economic Theory 18 IssueID2 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (1992) Telephone Service Quality Handbook Prepared for the Committee on Communications by the Staff Subcommittee on Telephone Service Quality. DC, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • National Regulatory Research Institute. 2001 State Public Service Commission Reliability Survey, available at http://www.nrri.ohio-state. edu/programs/reliability/survey/reliability\_print.php.

  • E. Noam (1991) “The Quality of Regulation in Regulating Quality: A Proposal for an Integrated Incentive Approach to Telephone Service Performance” Michael Einhorn (Eds) Price Caps and Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell. MA 167–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat 2003 Levels of Service for the Water Industry in England and Wales 2001–2003 Report available at http://www.ofwat.gov.uk

  • E. Pazner (1975) “Quality Choice and Monopoly Regulation” R. Caves M. Roberts (Eds) Regulating the Product: Quality and Variety Ballinger Publishing Company Cambridge, MA 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Chavolla, L. 2003. “Survey of State Retail Telephone Quality of Service Standards: Organized by Category of Service”. National Regulatory Research Institute Report No. 03–17s.

  • A. M. Polinsky Y. Che (1991) ArticleTitle“Decoupling Liability: Optimal Incentives for Care and Liability” Rand Journal of Economics 22 IssueID4 562–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, M. 2003. “Notes on Competitive Local Exchange Service”. Columbia University mimeo (October).

  • R. Romano (1994) ArticleTitle“Double Moral Hazard and Resale Price Maintenance” Rand Journal of Economics 25 IssueID3 455–466

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Ronnen (1991) ArticleTitle“Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition” Rand Journal of Economics 22 IssueID4 490–504

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Roycroft M. Garcia-Murrilo (2000) ArticleTitle“Trouble Reports as an Indicator of Service Quality: The Influence of Competition, Technology, and Regulation” Telecommunications Policy 24 IssueID10-11 947–967

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Rovizzi D. Thompson (1992) ArticleTitle“The Regulation of Product Quality in the Public Utilities and the Citizen’s Charter” Fiscal Studies 13 IssueID3 74–95

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Salop D. Scheffman W. Schwartz (1984) “A Bidding Analysis of Special Interest Regulation: Raising Rivals’ Costs in a Rent Seeking Society” R. Rogowsky B. Yandle (Eds) The Political Economy of Regulation: Private Interests in the Regulatory Process Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC 102–127

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sappington (2003) ArticleTitle“The Effects of Incentive Regulation on Retail Telephone Service Quality in the United States” Review of Network Economics 2 IssueID4 355–375

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sappington D. Weisman (1996a) ArticleTitle“Potential Pitfalls in Empirical Investigations of the Effects of Incentive Regulation Plans in the Telecommunications Industry” Information Economics and Policy 8 IssueID2 125–140

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sappington D. Weisman (1996b) Designing Incentive Regulation for the Telecommunications Industry MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sappington D. Weisman (2005) ArticleTitle“Self-Sabotage” Journal of Regulatory Economics 27 IssueID2 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Scarpa (1998) ArticleTitle“Minimum Quality Standards with More than Two Firms” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 IssueID5 665–676

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Schmalensee (1979) ArticleTitle“Market Structure, Durability, and Quality: A Selective Survey” Economic Inquiry 17 IssueID2 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Shaked J. Sutton (1982) ArticleTitle“Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation” Review of Economic Studies 49 IssueID1 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Shapiro (1986) ArticleTitle“Investment, Moral Hazard, and Occupational Licensing” Review of Economic Studies 53 IssueID1 843–862

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shavell (1984) ArticleTitle“A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation” Rand Journal of Economics 15 IssueID2 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sheshinski (1976) ArticleTitle“Price, Quality and Quantity Regulation in Monopoly Situations” Economica 43 IssueID170 127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sibley D. Weisman (1998) ArticleTitle“Raising Rivals’ Costs: The Entry of an Upstream Monopolist into Downstream Markets” Information Economics and Policy 10 IssueID4 451–470

    Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Spence (1975) ArticleTitle“Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation” Bell Journal of Economics 6 IssueID2 417–429

    Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Spence (1977) ArticleTitle“Consumer Misperceptions, Product Failure and Product Liability” Review of Economic Studies 44 IssueID138 561–572

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Swan (1970) ArticleTitle“Quality of Consumption Goods” American Economic Review 60 IssueID4 884–894

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Swan (1971) ArticleTitle“The Durability of Goods and Regulation of Monopoly” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 IssueID1 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Symeonidis (2003) ArticleTitle“Quality Heterogeneity and Welfare” Economics Letters 78 IssueID1 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangeras, T. 2003. “Yardstick Competition and Quality”. Research Institute of Industrial Economics (Stockholm) mimeo.

  • J. Tirole (1996) ArticleTitle“A Theory of Collective Reputations with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Quality” Review of Economic Studies 63 IssueID1 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Valletti (2000) ArticleTitle“Minimum Quality Standards under Cournot Competition” Journal of Regulatory Economics 18 IssueID3 235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Valletti C. Cambini (2002) “Investments and Network Competition” Management School Imperial College mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Vasington (2003) ArticleTitle“Incentive Regulation in Practice: A Massachusetts Case Study” Review of Network Economics 2 IssueID4 451–465

    Google Scholar 

  • W. K. Viscusi (1986) ArticleTitle“The Impact of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation, 1973–1983” Rand Journal of Economics 17 IssueID4 567–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. 2001. “The Regulation-Litigation Interaction”. AEI Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Working Paper No. 01–13.

  • I. Vogelsang J. Finsinger (1979) ArticleTitle“A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms” Bell Journal of Economics 10 IssueID1 157–171

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Weisman (1995) ArticleTitle“Regulation and the Vertically Integrated Firm: The Case of RBOC Entry Into InterLATA Long Distance” Journal of Regulatory Economics 8 IssueID3 249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • D.Weisman 2005 “Price Regulation and Quality” Information Economics and Policy forthcoming

  • Weisman, D. 2002. “A Theory of Mergers in Network Industries”. Kansas State University mimeo.

  • D. Weisman J. Kang (2001) ArticleTitle“Incentives for Discrimination When Upstream Monopolists Participate in Downstream Markets” Journal of Regulatory Economics 20 IssueID2 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  • L. White (1972) ArticleTitle“Quality Variation When Prices Are Regulated” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 3 IssueID2 425–436

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Williamson (2001) ArticleTitle“Incentives for Service Quality: Getting the Framework Right” Electricity Journal 14 IssueID5 62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Williamson (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. The Free Press. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Wolinsky (1997) ArticleTitle“Regulation of Duopoly: Managed Competition vs Regulated Monopolies”. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6 IssueID4 821–847

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Wood D. Sappington (2005) ArticleTitle“On the Design of Performance Measurement Plans in the Telecommunications Industry” Telecommunications Policy 28 IssueID11 801–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Woroch, G. 2000. “Competition and Investment in Digital Infrastructure”. University of California - Berkeley mimeo.

  • P. Zimmerman (2003) ArticleTitle“Regional Bell Operating Company Entry Into Long-Distance and Non-Price Discrimination Against Rival Interexchange Carriers: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 19 IssueID4 269–290

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Zweifel R. Eichenberger (1992) ArticleTitle“The Political Economy of Corporatism in Medicine: Self-Regulation or Cartel Management?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4 IssueID1 89–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. M. Sappington.

Additional information

JEL classification: L51, L15

I am grateful to Mark Armstrong, Sanford Berg, Michael Crew, Lynne Holt, Mark Jamison, Lilia Perez-Chavolla, Paul Sotkiewicz, Dennis Weisman, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sappington, D.E.M. Regulating Service Quality: A Survey. J Regul Econ 27, 123–154 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-004-5341-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-004-5341-9

Keywords

Navigation