Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal transmission switching: economic efficiency and market implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, transmission assets for bulk power flow in the electric grid have been modeled as fixed assets in the short run, except during times of forced outages or maintenance. This traditional view does not permit reconfiguration of the transmission grid by the system operators to improve system performance and economic efficiency. The current push to create a smarter grid has brought to the forefront the possibility of co-optimizing generation along with the network topology by incorporating the control of transmission assets within the economic dispatch formulations. Unfortunately, even though such co-optimization improves the social welfare, it may be incompatible with prevailing market design practices since it can create winners and losers among market participants and it has unpredictable distributional consequences in the energy market and in the financial transmission rights (FTR) market. In this paper, we first provide an overview of recent research on optimal transmission switching, which demonstrates the substantial economic benefit that is possible even while satisfying standard N−1 reliability requirements. We then discuss various market implications resulting from co-optimizing the network topology with generation and we examine how transmission switching may affect locational Marginal Prices (LMPs), i.e., energy prices, and revenue adequacy in the FTR market when FTR settlements are financed by congestion revenues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

g :

Generator

g(n):

Set of generators at bus n

k :

Transmission element (line or transformer)

k(n, .), k(., n):

Set of transmission elements with bus n as the to bus and the set with bus n as the from bus respectively

m, n :

Nodes

B k :

Susceptance of transmission element k

c g :

Production cost for generator g

d n :

Real power load at node n

G k :

Conductance of transmission element k

M k :

Big M value for transmission element k

\({P_{g}^{\rm max}, P_{g}^{\rm min}}\) :

Max and min capacity of generator g

\({P_{k}^{\rm max}, P_{k}^{\rm min}}\) :

Max and min rating of transmission element k; typically \({P_{k}^{\rm max}= -P_{k}^{\rm min}}\)

θ max, θ min :

Max and min bus voltage angle difference; typically θ max =  − θ min

P g :

Real power supply from generator g at node n

P k :

Real power flow from node m to node n for transmission element k

Q k :

Reactive power flow from node m to node n for transmission element k

V n :

Bus voltage at node n

z k :

Binary switching variable for transmission element k(0 open/not in service, 1 closed/in service)

\({\phi_{k}}\) :

Bus voltage angle difference across transmission element k

θ n :

Bus voltage angle at node n

References

  • Alsac O., Bright J. M., Brignone S., Prais M., Silva C., Scott B., Vempati N. (2004) The rights to fight price volatility. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 2(4): 47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacher R., Glavitsch H. (1986) Network topology optimization with security constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 1(4): 103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacher R., Glavitsch H. (1988) Loss reduction by network switching. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 3(2): 447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakirtzis A. G., Meliopoulos A. P. S. (1987) Incorporation of switching operations in power system corrective control computations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2(3): 669–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumsack, S. A. (2006). Network topologies and transmission investment under electric-industry restructuring. PhD dissertation, Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Blumsack S., Lave L. B., Ilic M. (2007) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks. Energy JNL 28: 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher E. B., O’Neill R. P., Ferris M. C. (2008) Optimal transmission switching. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23(3): 1346–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliscounakis, S., Zaoui, F., Simeant, G., & Gonzalez, R. (2007). Topology influence on loss reduction as a mixed integer linear programming problem. In IEEE Power Tech 2007 (pp. 1987–1990), July 2007.

  • Glanzmann, G., & Andersson, G. (2005). Using FACTS devices to resolve congestions in transmission grids. In Proceedings of Cigre/IEEE PES Symposium, San Antonio, TX.

  • Glavitsch H. (1985) State of the art review: switching as means of control in the power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 7(2): 92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granelli G., Montagna M., Zanellini F., Bresesti P., Vailati R., Innorta M. (2006) Optimal network reconfiguration for congestion management by deterministic and genetic algorithms. Electric Power Systems Research 76(6–7): 549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribik, P., Hogan, W. W., & Pope, S. L. (2010). Market-clearing electricity prices and energy uplift. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/whogan/Gribik_Hogan_Pope_Price_Uplift_123107.pdf.

  • Hedman K. W., Ferris M. C., O’Neill R. P., Fisher E. B., Oren S. S. (2010) Co-optimization of generation unit commitment and transmission switching with N−1 reliability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 25(2): 1052–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman K. W., O’Neill R. P., Fisher E. B., Oren S. S. (2008) Optimal transmission switching—sensitivity analysis and extensions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23(3): 1469–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman K. W., O’Neill R. P., Fisher E. B., Oren S. S. (2009) Optimal transmission switching with contingency analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 24(3): 1577–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman, K. W., O’Neill, R. P., Fisher, E. B., & Oren, S. S. Smart flexible just-in-time transmission and flowgate bidding.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(1), 93–102.

  • Hogan W. W. (1992) Contract networks for electric power transmission. The Journal of Regulatory Economics 4: 211–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO-NE (2007). ISO New England Operating Procedure no. 19: Transmission operations, pp. 7–8, 13 April 2007.

  • Mazi A. A., Wollenberg B. F., Hesse M. H. (1986) Corrective control of power system flows by line and bus-bar switching. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 1(3): 258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauman, S. (2008). VP, Exelon, Chicago, IL, private communication, July 2008.

  • Northeast Power Coordinating Council. (1997). Guidelines for inter-area voltage control. New York, NY: NPCC Operating Procedure Coordinating Committee and NPCC System Design Coordinating Committee.

  • O’Neill R. P., Baldick R., Helman U., Rothkopf M. H., Stewart W. (2005) Dispatchable transmission in RTO markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 20(1): 171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. P., Hedman, K. W., Krall, E. A., Papavasiliou, A., & Oren, S. S. Economic analysis of the N−1 reliable unit commitment and transmission switching problem using duality concepts. Energy Systems Journal, 1(2), 165–195.

  • O’Neill R. P., Sotkiewicz P. M., Hobbs B. F., Rothkopf M. H., Stewart W. (2005) Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with non-convexities. European Journal of Operational Research 164(1): 269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, A. (2008). VP, PJM, Norristown, PA, private communication, July 2008.

  • PJM. (2009). Manual 3: Transmission operations, Revision: 35, October 5, 2009. Section 5: Index and operating procedures for PJM RTO Operation. http://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/compliance/nerc-standards/~/media/documents/manuals/m03.ashx

  • Power System Test Case Archive (2010). University of Washington, Department of Electrical Engineering. http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/index.html.

  • Schnyder G., Glavitsch H. (1988) Integrated security control using an optimal power flow and switching concepts. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 3(2): 782–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnyder G., Glavitsch H. (1990) Security enhancement using an optimal switching power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 5(2): 674–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W., Vittal V. (2005) Corrective switching algorithm for relieving overloads and voltage violations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 20(4): 1877–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W., Vittal V. (2006a) LP-based OPF for corrective FACTS control to relieve overloads and voltage violations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 21(4): 1832–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, W., & Vittal, V. (2006b). BIP-based OPF for line and bus-bar switching to relieve overloads and voltage violations. In Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 29 October–1 November 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kory W. Hedman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedman, K.W., Oren, S.S. & O’Neill, R.P. Optimal transmission switching: economic efficiency and market implications. J Regul Econ 40, 111–140 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9158-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9158-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation