Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Student Experiences With Information Technology And Their Relationship To Other Aspects Of Student Engagement

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colleges and universities have made considerable effort to get students to use information technology productively. This study uses data from the 2003 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to investigate the relationships between student uses of information technology and other forms of student engagement. There appears to be a strong positive relationship between using information technology for educational purposes and involvement in effective educational practices such as active and collaborative learning and student–faculty interaction. The results also point to the prospect that particular areas of involvement with information technology could be viewed as forms of engagement in and of themselves. In addition, when students use information technology it may increase their opportunities for other types of engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Alavi (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly June: 159–174

  • R. M. Carini J. H. Hayek G. D. Kuh J. M. Kennedy J. A. Ouimet (2003) ArticleTitleCollege student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education 44 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • A. W. Chickering Z. F. Gamson (1987) ArticleTitleSeven principles for food practice in undergraduate education AAHE Bulletin 39 IssueID7 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Dillon R. Gabbard (1998) ArticleTitleHypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style Review of Educational Research 68 322–349

    Google Scholar 

  • M. G. Dolence D. M. Norris (1995) Transforming higher education: A vision for learning in the 21st century Society for College and University Planning Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Flowers E. T. Pascarella C. T. Pierson (2000) ArticleTitleInformation technology use and cognitive outcomes in the first year of college Journal of Higher Education 71 IssueID6 637–667

    Google Scholar 

  • L. E. Gladieux W. S. Swail (1999) The virtual university and educational opportunity: Issues of equity and access for the next generation College Board Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • K. C. Green (1996) ArticleTitleThe coming ubiquity of information technology Change 28 IssueID2 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • HuS., and KuhG. D. (2001). Computing experience and good practices in undergraduate education: Does the degree of campus ΓÇ£wirednessΓÇ¥ matter? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(49). Retrieved January 26, 2004 from http://epaa. asu.edu/epaa/v9n49.html..

  • Institute for Higher Education Policy (1999). Distance learning in higher education, Washington, DC: Author.

  • Kennedy, C. (2000). Implications for new pedagogy in higher education: Can online technology enhance student engagement and learning? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443382).

  • G. D. Kuh (2001a) ArticleTitleAssessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement Change 33 IssueID3 10–17, 66

    Google Scholar 

  • G. D. Kuh (2001b) The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • G. D. Kuh (2003) ArticleTitleWhat we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE Change 35 IssueID2 24–32

    Google Scholar 

  • G. D. Kuh S. Hu (2001) ArticleTitleThe relationships between computer and information technology usestudent learning, and other college experiences Journal of College Student Development 42 217–232

    Google Scholar 

  • G. D. Kuh N. Vesper (2001) ArticleTitleDo computers enhance or detract from student learning? Research in Higher Education 42 87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement (2003). Converting Data into Action: Expanding the Boundaries of Institutional Improvement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

  • D. Oblinger M. Maruyama (1996) Distributed learning CAUSE BoulderCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, L. (2000, June 5). 10% of students may spend too much time onlinestudy suggests. The Chronicle of Higher Education [On-line]. Retrieved May 25, 2004 from http://chronicle.com/free/2000/06/2000060501t.htm.

  • Student Monitor (2003). Computing and the Internet: Fall 2002. RidgewoodNJ: Author.

  • C. A. Twigg (2004) Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Lessons Learned from Round II of the Pew Grant Program in Course Redesign Center for Academic Transformation Troy, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Wingard (2004) ArticleTitleClassroom teaching changes in web-enhanced courses: A multi-institutional study EDUCAUSE Quarterly 27 IssueID1 26–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas F. Nelson Laird.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laird, T.F.N., Kuh, G.D. Student Experiences With Information Technology And Their Relationship To Other Aspects Of Student Engagement. Res High Educ 46, 211–233 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1600-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1600-y

Keywords

Navigation