Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student Employment and Persistence: Evidence of Effect Heterogeneity of Student Employment on College Dropout

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores how student employment affects college persistence and how these effects differ by individual likelihood of participating in student employment. I analyze data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 using propensity score matching and stratification-multilevel analysis. This study finds that engaging in intense work has deleterious effects on college persistence. However, these negative effects vary significantly according to likelihood of participation in intense work. The results indicate that employment has less negative impacts on completion for those most likely to participate in intense work, who are typically those from the most disadvantaged social backgrounds. This finding suggests that efforts to reduce the deleterious effects of intense work on persistence should be practiced with careful consideration for sub-populations that may have different reasons for and effects of student employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms “effect” and “impact” in this study indicate an association or relationship between employment and dropout and do not imply a causal relationship. Propensity score matching depends on the ignorability assumption, which is the assumption that there are no additional confounders between treated and untreated units conditional on set of pretreatment covariates. However, there is always the possibility of unobserved factors that may simultaneously affect both treatment and outcome.

  2. This study defines three sets of counterfactual scenarios and all analyses are separately conducted for each sub-sample. While the intense versus anything else model includes all individuals, the intense versus moderate model does not include no-work individuals. Likewise, the intense versus no-work model does not include moderate work individuals.

  3. The mean dropout rate of the sample in this study is about 14% (see Table 1), which is lower than the national rate for first to second year retention. For example, the national first to second year retention rate of four-year colleges in 2005 was about 70% (ACT Institutional Data File, 2005). This gap is largely due to the fact that my sample do not include transfer students as dropout cases. If I include transfer students as dropout cases, the mean dropout rates of this sample increase to 25%. I conducted supplementary analyses including transfer students as dropouts, and the results were similar to the findings of this study.

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aughinbaugh, A., & Gardecki, R. M. (2008). Attrition in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (Working Paper).

  • Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. (1993). How part-time work intensity relates to drug use, problem behavior, time use, and satisfaction among high school seniors: Are these consequences or merely correlates? Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozick, R. (2007). Making it through the first year of college: The role of students’ economic resources, employment, and living arrangements. Sociology of Education, 80(3), 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J. E., & Halaby, C. N. (2006). Regression and matching estimates of the effects of elite college attendance on educational and career achievement. Social Science Research, 35(3), 749–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J. E., Pfeffer, F. T., & Goldrick-Rab, S. (2014). Interpreting community college effects in the presence of heterogeneity and complex counterfactuals. Sociological Science, 1, 448–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J. E., & Simon-Thomas, J. (2013). Causal effect heterogeneity. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J. E., & Xie, Y. (2010). Who benefits most from college? American Sociological Review, 75(2), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (1988). Causal modeling and path analysis: An introduction and an illustration in student attrition research. Journal of College Student Development, 29(3), 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canabal, M. E. (1998). College student degree of participation in the labor force: Determinants and relationship to school performance. College Student Journal, 32(4), 597–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, R. (1984). Does employment during high school impair academic progress? Sociology of Education, 57(3), 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2000). Early work histories of urban youth. American Sociological Review, 65(2), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2005). Urban teenagers. Youth & Society, 37(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, E., & Steinberg, L. D. (1986). When teenagers work: The psychological and social costs of teenage employment. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebel, S. (2000). States without affirmative action focus on community-college transfers. Chronicle of Higher Education.

  • Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwai, S. I., & Churchill, W. D. (1982). College attrition and the financial support systems of students. Research in Higher Education, 17(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. (2004). Further evidence on adolescent employment and substance use: Differences by race and ethnicity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kablaoui, B. N., & Pautler, A. J. (1991). The effects of part-time work experience on high school students. Journal of Career Development, 17(3), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. C., & Staff, J. (2007). When work matters: The varying impact of work intensity on high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 80(2), 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1991). Employment during high school: Character building or a subversion of academic goals? Sociology of Education, 64(3), 172–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Kleitman, S. (2005). Consequences of employment during high school: Character building, subversion of academic goals, or a threshold? American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 331–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzner, B. S., & Bean, J. P. (1987). The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2010). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1998). Protecting youth at work: Health, safety, and development of working children and adolescents in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orszag, J. M., Orszag, P. R., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). Learning and earning: Working in college. Newton: Upromise Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Chapman, D. W. (1983). A multiinstitutional, path analytic validation of Tinto’s model of college withdrawal. American Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2010). Toward a more complete understanding of the role of financial aid in promoting college enrollment: The importance of context. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 129–179). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Massa-McKinley, R. C. (2008). First-year students’ employment, engagement, and academic achievement: Untangling the relationship between work and grades. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 45(4), 1012–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampell, C. (2011). Are young college grads too lazy to work? New York Times.

  • Riggert, S. C., Boyle, M., Petrosko, J. M., Ash, D., & Rude-Parkins, C. (2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roksa, J. (2011). Differentiation and work: Inequality in degree attainment in US higher education. Higher Education, 61(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roksa, J., & Velez, M. (2010). When studying schooling is not enough: Incorporating employment in models of educational transitions. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J. E., Deli-Amen, R., & Person, A. E. (2006). After admission: From college access to college success. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenhals, M., Tienda, M., & Schneider, B. (1998). The educational and personal consequences of adolescent employment. Social Forces, 77(2), 723–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. G. (1970). Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange, 1(1), 64–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staff, J., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2010). Adolescent work intensity, school performance, and academic engagement. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, F. K. (1988). University attrition: LISREL with logistic regression for the persistence criterion. Research in Higher Education, 29(4), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, F. K., & Hossler, D. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education, 30(3), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. D., Fegley, S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1993). Negative impact of part-time work on adolescent adjustment: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. D., Greenberger, E., Garduque, L., & McAuliffe, S. (1982). High school students in the labor force: Some costs and benefits to schooling and learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. R., LePore, P. C., & Mare, R. D. (2000). Employment during high school: Consequences for students’ grades in academic courses. American Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley, L. P. (1995). Working adolescents: Implications for counselors. The School Counselor, 42(3), 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Brand, J. E., & Jann, B. (2012). Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with observational data. Sociological Methodology, 42(1), 314–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Studies Education, Korea National University of Education, 250 Taeseongtabyeon-ro, Gangnae-myeon, Cheongju-Si, Chungbuk, 28173, Korea

    Yool Choi

Authors
  1. Yool Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yool Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, Y. Student Employment and Persistence: Evidence of Effect Heterogeneity of Student Employment on College Dropout. Res High Educ 59, 88–107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9458-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9458-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation