Skip to main content
Log in

Issues Arising from the Long-Term Evaluation of Cognitive Acceleration Programs

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the early 1980s we have been engaged in the design, implementation, and evaluation of “cognitive acceleration” programs, which claim to enhance students’ general intellectual processing skills. We have published extensive data showing long-term effects of these programs on students’ cognitive development and academic achievement. In this paper the theory base of cognitive acceleration will be briefly outlined and some typical results re-presented. The main body of the paper will be devoted to a discussion of a number of issues which arise from the analysis of long-term effects. Although the examples will be drawn from the cognitive acceleration programs, the issues are general ones which might apply to any long-term study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey, P. (1997). It all depends on the context, doesn’t it? Searching for general, educable, dragons. Studies in Science Education, 29, 45–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P. (2003). Changing minds. Educational and child psychology, 20(2), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J., & Landau, N. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., Nagy, F., Robertson, A., Serret, N., & Wadsworth, P. (2003). Let’s think through science! London: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. (2001). Let’s think! Slough, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. (2002). Effects of a cognitive stimulation programme on Year 1 pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1993). An exploration of long-term far-transfer effects following an extended intervention programme in the high school science curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 11(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., Shayer, M., & Yates, C. (2001). Thinking science: The curriculum materials of the CASE project (3rd ed.). London: Nelson Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham City Council (1997). Signposts. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure change, or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsman, J., Adey, P., & Barber, J. (1993, April). A thinking science curriculum. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Boston, MA.

  • Hautamäki, J., Kuusela, J., & Wikström, J. (2002, July). CASE and CAME in Finland: “The second wave.” Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Thinking, Harrogate, UK.

  • Lazar, I., & Darlington, R. (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the consortium for longitudinal studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(2/3).

  • Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston, MA: Harward University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieler, J. (2001, April). The value of derivative scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of British Psychological Society, Glasgow, UK.

  • Raven, J. (1998). Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologist’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M. (1999). Cognitive acceleration through science education II: Its effect and scope. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (Eds.). (2002). Learning intelligence: Cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 years. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M., Wylam, H., Küchemann, D., & Adey, P. (1978). Science reasoning tasks. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., & Ilsley, J. (1992). The high scope approach to working with young children. Early Education, Spring, 5–7.

  • Vernon, P. E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., & Burman, W. (1983). Discerning the future of early childhood intervention. American Psychologist, 38, 894–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Adey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adey, P. Issues Arising from the Long-Term Evaluation of Cognitive Acceleration Programs. Res Sci Educ 35, 3–22 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3430-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3430-5

Keywords

Navigation