Abstract
In this paper, we present a case study of a beginning chemistry teacher who enrolled in a project aimed to contribute to the development of teachers' knowledge of models and modelling in science. The project consisted of a series of institutional meetings in combination with an action research project the teacher conducted in her own classes. By explaining how the project was conducted and mainly by focusing on the teacher's voice, her dynamic, continuous, and non-linear process of knowledge development is discussed in detail. We were able to investigate and describe this development in terms of various types of knowledge – content knowledge, curricular knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge – which were developed simultaneously. Among other results, it became clear how certain institutional activities led to specific choices in the teacher's action research project. For instance, although initially she was reluctant to conduct a modelling activity in her class, she decided to experiment with such an activity in her action research project. Subsequently, the responses of her students during the project convinced her of the value of this modelling activity and helped her to become aware of specific views of her students. Finally, it became evident that the whole experience made her very enthusiastic and stimulated her to formulate specific intentions with respect to the future, both in terms of applying certain teaching activities and in terms of collaborating with colleagues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London, UK: Falmer Press.
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. (2000). Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teachers Education, 16, 749–764.
Bencze, T., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 521–540.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationships to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53–62.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
Clermont, C. P., Krajcik, J. S., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 21–43.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. (Eds.). (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2002, April). Engaging prospective science teachers in building, testing, and teaching about models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Denzin, N. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research design (pp. 500–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duit, R., & Glynn, S. (1996). Mental modelling. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp. 166–176). London: Falmer.
Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for chemistry education. Science & Education, 10, 581–593.
Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 513–540.
Francoeur, E. (1997). The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27, 7–40.
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1997). Learning science through models and modelling. In B. Frazer & K. Tobin (Eds.), The international handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 83–97.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799–822.
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.
Harrison, A. (2001, March). Models and PCK: Their relevance for practicing and pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541–562.
Janesick, V. J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 379–399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002a). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002b). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273–1292.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003a, August). Investigating teachers' ideas about models and modelling: Some issues of authenticity. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003b). Teachers' views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.
Justi, R., & van Driel, J. (in press). The development of science teachers knowledge on models and modelling – Promoting, characterising and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education.
Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469.
Lynch, S. (1997). Novice teachers' encounter with national science education reform: Entanglements or intelligent interconnections? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 3–18.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge – The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mainzer, K. (1999). Computational models and virtual reality – New perspectives of research in chemistry. HYLE – An International Journal of the Philosophy of Chemistry, 5, 117–126.
Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Review of Educational Research, 22, 305–343.
Parke, H. M., & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 773–790.
Powell, R. (1994). From field science to classroom science: A case study of constrained emergence in a second-career science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 273–291.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harward Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Smith, J. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, R., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D. et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 930–954.
van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1141–1153.
van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
van Driel, J. H., de Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572–590.
Wallace, J. (2001). Introduction: Science teaching cases as learning opportunities. Research in Science Education, 31, 185–190.
Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (2000). Teachers' learning – Stories of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Justi, R., van Driel, J. A Case Study of the Development of a Beginning Chemistry Teacher's Knowledge about Models and Modelling. Res Sci Educ 35, 197–219 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-7583-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-7583-z