This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychological Review, 14, 5–26.
diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293–331.
Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89, 335–347.
Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491–520.
Ford, M. J. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92, 404–423.
Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Refining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1–32.
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In G. Rijlaarsdam, M. Torrance, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (Vol. 4 in Studies in Writing) (pp. 139–164). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.
Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhlen (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (Vol. 3 in Models and Modeling in Science Education) (pp. 3–24). Dordrecht: Springer.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Hand, B. (Ed.). (2007). Science inquiry, argument and language: A case for the Science Writing Heuristic. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Hand, B., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J. P., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “Island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? [Guest editorial]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607–615.
Klein, P. D. (2006). The challenges of science literacy: From the viewpoint of second generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 143–178.
Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157–176.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school—Expanded edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: The National Academies Press.
O’Halloran, K. L. (Ed.). (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London: Continuum.
Paivio, A. (1978). Comparisons of mental clocks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 61–71.
Patterson, N. D., & Norwood, K. S. (2004). A case study of teacher beliefs on students’ beliefs about multiple representations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 5–23.
Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 301–318.
Rouet, J. F., Lowe, R., & Schnotz, W. (2008). Understanding multimedia documents: An introduction. In J. F. Rouet, R. Lowe, & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Understanding multimedia documents (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101–120.
Tippett, C.D. (2008, August). Exploring middle school students‚ visual literacy in science. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Special Interest Group (Text and Graphics), Tilburg, Netherlands.
Trumbo, J. (1999). Visual literacy and science communication. Science Communication, 20, 409–425.
Trumbo, J. (2005). Making science visible: Visual literacy in science communication. In L. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual culture of science: Rethinking representation practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. 266–283). Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press/University Press of New England.
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Yore, L. D., Hand, B., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J., Treagust, D. F., et al. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 347–352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yore, L.D., Hand, B. Epilogue: Plotting a Research Agenda for Multiple Representations, Multiple Modality, and Multimodal Representational Competency. Res Sci Educ 40, 93–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9160-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9160-y