Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Development of In-Service Science Teachers’ Understandings of and Orientations to Teaching the Nature of Science within a PCK-Based NOS Course

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 January 2013

Abstract

The nature of science (NOS) has become a central goal of science education in many countries. This study sought an understanding of the extent to which a nature of science course (NOSC), designed according to the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching nature of science (NOS), affects in-service science teachers’ understanding and learning of NOS, and their orientations towards teaching it. A qualitative research approach was employed as a research methodology, drawing upon pre- and post-instruction NOS questionnaires, field notes, and in-service teachers’ weekly journal entries and assignments. Open-ended NOS questionnaires, used to assess participants’ understandings of NOS, were analysed and categorized as either informed, partially informed and naive. Other qualitative data were analysed through an inductive process to identify ways in-service teachers engaged and learned in the NOSC. The results indicate that at the beginning of the course, a majority of the in-service science teachers held naive understandings of NOS, particularly with respect to the definition of science, scientific inquiry, and differences between laws and theories. They viewed implicit project-based science and science process skills as goals of NOS instruction. By engaging in the course, the in-service science teachers developed an understanding of NOS and orientations to teaching NOS based on various elements, especially reflective and explicit instruction, role modelling, and content- and non-content embedded instruction. The aim of this study is to help science teacher educators, consider how to support and develop science teachers’ understandings of NOS while being mindful of PCK for NOS, and develop methods for teaching NOS frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Relationships among learner characteristics and preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A., Loughran, J., & van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucat, R. (2004). Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward: Applied research in chemistry education. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, A. (2004). Focusing labs on the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, D. J., Gunstone, R. F., & Dillon, J. (2010). Approaches in considering the professional knowledge base of science. In D. J. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. F. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, T. A., Akerson, V. L., & Hanson, D. L. (2010). Using action research to engage K-6 teachers in nature of science inquiry as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(8), 971–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1989). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidar, A. H. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers’ views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 807–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95, 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers conception of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conception of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, L. S. (2004). Revisiting instruction to teach nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., & Chen, C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2004). Keys to teaching the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3–39). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellado, V., Bermejo, M. L., Blanco, L. J., & Ruiz, C. (2007). The classroom practice of a prospective secondary biology teacher and his conceptions of the nature of science and of teaching and learning science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narguizian, P. (2004). Science through evolution. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2011). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y.

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as conceptual too to understand teachers as professional. Research in Science Education, 28, 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Institute of Promotion of Science and Technology Teaching (IPST). (2002). Thai science teachers standards. Bangkok: The Institute of Promotion of Science and Technology Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ views on Science–Technology–Society issues. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to gratefully thank Professor Anthony Clarke for his advice and encouragement during writing this article. His constructive criticism contributed enormously to the production of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan Rd., Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

    Chatree Faikhamta

Authors
  1. Chatree Faikhamta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chatree Faikhamta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faikhamta, C. The Development of In-Service Science Teachers’ Understandings of and Orientations to Teaching the Nature of Science within a PCK-Based NOS Course. Res Sci Educ 43, 847–869 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9283-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9283-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation