Abstract
This study explored factors of students’ mental states, including emotion, intention, internal mental representation, and external mental representation, which can affect their learning performance. In evaluating students’ mental states during the science learning process and the relationship between mental states and learning achievement, valid, reliable, and scalable measures of students’ mental states and learning achievement are needed. This paper presents the development of the Mental State Conceptual Learning Inventory (MSCLI) to identify students’ mental states before and after learning about acids and bases. This instrument is time efficient and convenient and can be administered to large student samples so that teachers and researchers can gain profound insights into their students’ learning of acids and bases in science class. The results of this study indicate that students’ mental states are highly correlated with their achievement. As a whole, low-achieving students tended to have negative emotions and low intentions, were not good at internal visualization, and were unable to interpret graphics and draw pictures. In contrast, high-achieving students had positive emotions and intentions when learning life-related topics about acids and bases, and were good at internal visualization and drawing and interpreting graphics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsop, S. (2005). Beyond Cartesian dualisms—encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043–1047.
Artdej, R., Ratanaroutai, T., Coll, R. K., & Thongpanchang, T. (2010). Thai grade 11 students’ alternative conceptions for acid-base chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 167–183.
Boz, Y. (2010). Turkish prospective chemistry teachers: alternative conceptions about acids and bases. School Science and Mathematics, 109(4), 212–222.
Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 129–186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: an investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 209–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
Chiu, M. H., Guo, C. J., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding in science: an introduction about a national project in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 379–390.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Discovering and exploring habits of mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
De Vos, W., & Pilot, A. (2001). Acids and bases in layers: the stratal structure of an ancient topic. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 494–499.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Widodo, A. (2008). Teaching science for conceptual change: theory and practice. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 629–647). New York: Routledge.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–292.
Ebenezer, J., Chacko, S., Kaya, O. N., Koya, S. K., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2010). Effects of common knowledge construction model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 25–46.
Feinfield, K. A., Lee, P. P., Flavell, E. R., Green, F. L., & Flavell, J. H. (1999). Young children’s understanding of intention. Cognitive Development, 14, 463–468.
Furió-Más, C., Calatayud, M. L., Guisasola, J., & Furió-Gómez, C. (2005). How are the concepts and theories of acid-base reactions presented? Chemistry in textbooks and as presented by teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1337–1358.
Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73–79.
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1998). Learning science though models and modeling. In K. Tobin & B. Frazer (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer.
Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M., & Nakhleh, M. (Eds.). (2008). Visualization: theory and practice in science education. Springer.
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146.
Hanoch, B. Y. (1997). Against characterizing mental states as propositional attitudes. The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(186), 84–89.
Jaggar, R. (1989). Love and knowledge: emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, knowledge, reality (pp. 129–155). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & van Gog, T. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: how experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 146–154.
Kendeou, P., & van de Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 235–245.
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205–226.
Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1996). Educational testing and measurement (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, J. W., & Chiu, M. H. (2007). Exploring the characteristics and diverse sources of students’ mental models of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 771–803.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313–327.
Liu, C. J. (2003). The study on the relationship between student’s mental state and the learning environment. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Science. South Africa: Mathematics and Technology Education.
Liu, C. J., & Hou, I. L. (2004). A study on mental states of ninth grade students in learning about the concepts of plate tectonics. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 399–420.
Liu, C. J., & Hou, I. L. (2011). Explore the influence of prior knowledge on understanding in scientific diagrams through eye tracking. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(Special Issue on Reading), 227–250.
Liu, C. J., & Treagust, D. F. (2005). An instrument for assessing students’ mental state and the learning environment in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 625–637.
McClary, L., & Talanquer, V. (2011). College students’ mental models of acids and acid strength. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 396–413.
McKendree, J., Small, C., Stenning, K., & Conlon, T. (2002). The role of representation in teaching and learning critical thinking. Educational Review, 54(1), 57–67.
Moreno, R., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2011). Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: effects on students’ problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 32–47.
Nakhleh, M. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence on levels of information as presented by different technologies on students’ understanding of acid, base, and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1077–1096.
Nelmes, P. (2003). Developing a conceptual framework for the role of the emotions in the language of teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Bellaria, Italy, February 28–March 3, 2003.
Ondáš, S., Bevacqua, E., Juhár, J., & Demeter, P. (2010). Towards influencing of the conversational agent mental state in the task of active listening. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5967, 113–121.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Research in Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
Ouertatani, L., Dumon, A., Trabelsi-Ayadi, M., & Soudani, M. L. (2007). Acids and bases: the appropriation of the Arrhenius model by Tunisian grade 10 students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 483–506.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: a dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Purton, A. J. (1998). Mental state attribution. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University.
Sehon, S. R. (1994). Teleology and the nature of mental states. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(1), 63–72.
Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32–45.
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.
Sobol-Shikler, T. (2011). Automatic inference of complex affective states. Computer Speech and Language, 25, 46–52.
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Compatibility between cultural studies and conceptual change in science education: There is more to acknowledge than to fight straw men! Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 387–395.
Treagust, D. F., & Harrison, A. G. (1994). The genesis of effective scientific explanations for the classroom. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: methodologies and practices for understanding of pedagogy (pp. 28–43). London: Falmer.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1353–1368.
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50(1), 47–54.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (2008). The conceptual change approach and the teaching of science. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 619–628). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Zembylas, M. (2005). Three perspectives on linking the cognitive and the emotional in science learning: conceptual change, socio-constructivism and poststructuralism. Studies in Science Education, 41, 91–116.
Zull, J. E. (2011). From brain to mind: using neuroscience to guide change in education. Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, CJ., Hou, IL., Chiu, HL. et al. An Exploration of Secondary Students’ Mental States When Learning About Acids and Bases. Res Sci Educ 44, 133–154 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9373-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9373-y