Skip to main content
Log in

Rules rather than discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores options for programs to be put in place prior to a disaster to avoid large and often poorly-managed expenditures following a catastrophe and to provide appropriate protection against the risk of those large losses which do occur. The lack of interest in insurance protection and mitigation by property owners and by public sector agencies prior to a disaster often creates major problems following a catastrophic event for victims and the government. Property owners who suffer severe damage may not have the financial resources easily at hand to rebuild their property and hence will demand relief. The government is then likely to respond with costly but poorly targeted disaster assistance. To avoid these large and often uneven ex post expenditures, we consider the option of mandatory comprehensive private disaster insurance with risk-based rates. It may be more efficient to have an ex ante public program to ensure coverage of catastrophic losses and to subsidize low income residents who cannot afford coverage rather than the current largely ex post public disaster relief program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourne, Joel K. (2004). “Gone with the Water,” National Geographic October.

  • Burby, Raymond J. et al. (1991). Sharing Environmental Risks: How to Control GovernmentsLosses in Natural Disasters. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, Colin and Howard Kunreuther. (1989). “Decision Processes for Low Probability Events: Policy Implications,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8, 565–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Neil, Paul Kleindorfer and Howard Kunreuther. (1990). “Insurance Perspectives on an Integrated Hazardous Waste Management Strategy,” Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 27, 407–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. (1998). Incentives and Impediments to Improving the Seismic Performance of Buildings. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2006). Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended by Public Law 93–288, June, 2006. Online at http://www.fema.gov/ library/stafact.shtm (accessed July 5, 2006).

  • Grace, Martin F., Robert W. Klein and Paul R. Kleindorfer. (2004). “Homeowners Insurance with Bundled Catastrophe Coverage,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 7, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, Patricia and Howard Kunreuther. (2005). Catastrophe Modeling: A New Approach to Managing Risk. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Scott. (2000). “Rethinking Disaster Policy,” Regulation Spring 40–46.

  • Harrington, Scott. (2006). “Rethinking Disaster Policy After Hurricane Katrina,” In: R. Daniels, D. Kettl, and H. Kunreuther (eds.), On Risk and Disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, Robert and Claire Wilkinson. (2005a). Public/Private Mechanisms Handling Catastrophic Risk in the United States. New York: October, Insurance Information Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, Robert and Claire Wilkinson. (2005b). The National Flood Insurance Program. New York: October, Insurance Information Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, Robin and Howard Kunreuther. (1995). “Decision Making Under Ignorance: Arguing with Yourself,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 10, 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Jim. (2005). “A Policy of Deceit.” New York Times, November 19.

  • Insurance Information Institute. (2005). “Flood Insurance: Facts & Figures.” November 15.

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, Louis. (1991). “Incentives and Government Relief for Risk,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard. (1973). Recovery from Natural Disasters: Insurance or Federal Aid? Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, et al. (1978). Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, Warren Sanderson and Rudolph Vetschera. (1985). “A Behavioral Model of the Adoption of Protective Activities,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 6, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, Nathan Novemsky and Daniel Kahneman. (2001). “Making Low Probabilities Useful,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard and Mark Pauly. (2004). “Neglecting Disaster: Why Don’t People Insure Against Large Losses?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard. (2006). “Comprehensive Disaster Insurance: Has its Time Come?” In: R. Daniels, D. Kettl, and H. Kunreuther (eds.), Risk and Disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, Finn and Edward Prescott. (1977). “Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans,” Journal of Political Economy 85, 473–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litan, Robert. (2006). “Sharing and Reducing the Financial Risks of Future Mega-Catastrophes,” Issues in Economic Policy 4. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magat, Wes, W. Kip Viscusi and Joel Huber. (1987). “Risk-dollar Tradeoffs, Risk Perceptions, and Consumer Behavior,” In: W. Viscusi and W. Magat (eds.), Learning about Risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (2006). “Free Markets and Fettered Consumers.” American Economic Review 96, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, David. (2002). When All Else Fails: Government as the Ultimate Risk Manager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Orleans Times-Picayune. (2002). “Washing Away: Special Report from the Times-Picayune,” The New Orleans Times-Picayune June 23–27.

  • Palm, Risa. (1990). Natural Hazards: An Integrative Framework for Research and Planning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, Risa. (1995). Earthquake Insurance: A Longitudinal Studies of California Homeowners. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasterick, Edward T. (1998). “The National Flood Insurance Program,” In: Howard Kunreuther and Richard J. Roth, Sr. (eds.), Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risk Management Solutions. (2004). “The Northridge, California Earthquake. A 10-Year Retrospective,” May.

  • Roth, Richard Jr. (1998). “Earthquake Insurance in the United States,” In: Howard Kunreuther and Richard J. Roth, Sr. (eds.), Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetters, Kent. (2004). “Insuring Against Terrorism: The Policy Challenge,” In: R. Litan and R. Herring (eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 139–182.

  • Tobin, Richard and Corinne Calfee. (2005). The National Flood Insurance Programs Mandatory Purchase Requirement: Policies, Processes, and Stakeholders. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers, Perrin. (2005). “Hurricane Katrina: Analysis of the Impact on the Insurance Industry,” Available online at http://www.towersperrin.com/tillinghast/publications/reports/Hurricane_Katrina/katrina.pdf.

  • Tversky, Amos, Shmuel Sattath and Paul Slovic. (1988). “Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice,” Psychological Review 95, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Government Accountability Office. (2005). Army Corps of Engineers: History of the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project. Statement of Ann Mittal before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate, November 9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Kunreuther.

Additional information

JEL Classification · G22 · H23 · H44

Howard Kunreuther is Cecilia Yen Koo Professor of Decision Sciences and of Business and Public Policy at The Wharton School of The University of Pennsylvania, and Co-Director of the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center.

Mark Pauly is Bendhelm Professor of Health Care Systems at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. Rules rather than discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. J Risk Uncertainty 33, 101–116 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0173-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0173-x

Keywords

Navigation