nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

01.12.2013

Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: a country-level analysis

verfasst von: Erik Stam

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

According to the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, knowledge created endogenously results in knowledge spillovers, which allow independent entrepreneurs to identify and exploit opportunities (Acs et al. in Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30, 2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship ignores entrepreneurial activities of employees within established organizations. This ignorance is largely empirical, because there has been no large-scale study on the prevalence and nature of entrepreneurial employee activities. This article presents the outcomes of the first large-scale international study of entrepreneurial employee activities. In multiple advanced capitalist economies, entrepreneurial employee activity is more prevalent than independent entrepreneurial activity. Innovation indicators are positively correlated with the prevalence of entrepreneurial employee activities, but are not or even negatively correlated with the prevalence of independent entrepreneurial activities.

Vorheriger Artikel Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: an empirical investigation

Nächster Artikel Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the literature

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

With some exceptions, such as Hornsby et al. (2002) on corporate entrepreneurship activities of middle managers, Parker (2011) on individuals starting a new venture for an employer, and Martiarena (2013), which is based on data from one country (Spain) of our research sample.

The exception being the literature on dispersed corporate entrepreneurship (e.g., Birkinshaw 1997; Belousova and Gailly 2013).

Previous large-scale research on entrepreneurial employee activity (Bosma et al. 2010) has shown that higher educated individuals are more likely to be intrapreneurs than lower educated individuals, and that lower educated individuals are more likely to be independent entrepreneurs than higher educated individuals. This has been confirmed in follow-up research by Bosma et al. (2012). Research on intrapreneurship has shown that higher educated employees are more likely to be involved in intrapreneurship than lower educated employees (Stam et al. 2012, chapter 3). So both within society and within organizations, education seems to be positively correlated to entrepreneurial employee activity.

This is a much more narrow definition than that of Martiarena (2013), which includes all employees that have been involved in the development of new business activities for their employer, irrespective of whether they had a leading role in this.

As Morris et al. (1994, p. 84) mention, entrepreneurial employee activity is unlikely to be a completely individual exercise: ‘The key is to balance the need for individual initiative with the spirit of cooperation and group ownership of innovation. This balance occurs over the entrepreneurial process, not all at once, and as micro-level innovation evolves into macro-level organizational change. Individuals are needed to provide the vision, unwavering commitment, and internal salesmanship without which nothing would be accomplished. But as the process unfolds, the entrepreneur requires teams of people with unique skills and resources’ (cf. Bartlett and Ghoshal 1997).

The 25 countries are: Australia, Belgium, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Korea (Rep.), Mexico, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, and USA.

Given that the dependent variables are positive, we also ran Tobit regressions as a robustness check. This delivered the same outcomes. We also performed a linear regression with new technology based TEA: this type of independent entrepreneurship is not (statistically significantly) related to the innovation indicators. Results are available upon request.

Acemoglu, D. (2012). The World our Grandchildren Will Inherit: The rights revolution and beyond. NBER Working Paper No. 17994.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 336–340.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRef

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.CrossRef

Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Baumol, W. (2002). The free market innovation machine: analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Belousova, O., & Gailly, B. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship in a dispersed setting: actors, behaviors, and process. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9, 361–377.CrossRef

Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. Economica, 75, 362–383.CrossRef

Birkinshaw, J. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 207–229.CrossRef

Bosma, N. S., Stam, E., & Wennekers, A. R. M. (2010). Intrapreneurship–An international study, EIM research report H201005. Zoetermeer: EIM.

Bosma, N., Stam, E., & Wennekers, S. (2012). Entrepreneurial employee activity: A large scale international study. Tjalling Koopmans Institute working paper 12–12. Utrecht: Utrecht University School of Economics.

Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34, 105–125.CrossRef

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462.CrossRef

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.

Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 23, 133–187.CrossRef

Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

Gartner, W. B., & Carter, N. M. (2003). Entrepreneurial behaviour and firm organizing processes. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 195–222). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1997). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. New York: Harper Collins.

Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica (New Series), 4, 33–54.CrossRef

Hellmann, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science, 53(6), 919–933.CrossRef

Helpman, E. (2004). The mystery of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253–273.CrossRef

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Klepper, S. (2007). Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of detroit as the capital of the u.s. automobile industry. Management Science, 53(4), 616–631.CrossRef

Klepper, S., & Thompson, P. (2010). Disagreements and intra-industry spinoffs. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(5), 526–538.CrossRef

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.CrossRef

Lange, T. (2012). Job satisfaction and self-employment: Autonomy or personality? Small Business Economics, 38(2), 165–177.CrossRef

Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–39.CrossRef

Lumpkin, G. T. (2007). Intrapreneurship and innovation. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 237–264). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Marcotte, C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurship at the country level: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(3–4), 174–194.CrossRef

Martiarena, A. (2013). What’s so entrepreneurial about intrapreneurs? Small Business Economics, 40(1), 27–39.CrossRef

Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 65–89.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Parker, S. C. (2011). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 19–34.CrossRef

Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.CrossRef

Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of growth of the firm (revised version 1995). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Qian, H. F., & Acs, Z. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 185–197.CrossRef

Reynolds, P. D., Bosma, N. S., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.CrossRef

Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 455–488.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.CrossRef

Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.CrossRef

Sørensen, J. B., & Fassiotto, M. (2011). Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(5), 1322–1331.CrossRef

Stam, E., & Nooteboom, B. (2011). Entrepreneurship, innovation and institutions. In D. Audretsch, O. Falck, & S. Heblich (Eds.), Handbook of research on innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 421–438). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 77–89.CrossRef

Stam, E., Bosma, N., Van Witteloostuijn, A., De Jong, J., Bogaert, S., Edwards, N., et al. (2012). Ambitious entrepreneurship. Adviesraad voor Wetenschap en Technologiebeleid (AWT): A review of the academic literature and new directions for public policy. Den Haag.

Teece, D. J. (1987). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRef

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRef

Thurik, R., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. (2013). The Rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8–9), 302–310.

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship performance relationship–a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.CrossRef

Titel: Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: a country-level analysis
verfasst von: Erik Stam
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9511-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship in an endogenous growth model

Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the literature

Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: an empirical investigation

Behavioral credit scoring model for technology-based firms that considers uncertain financial ratios obtained from relationship banking

The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research

The missing pillar: the creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship