Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International academic rankings that compare world universities have proliferated recently. In accordance with latter conceptual and methodological advances in academic rankings approaches, five selection criteria are defined and four international university rankings are selected. A comparative analysis of the four rankings is presented taking into account both the indicators frequency and its weights. Results show that, although some indicators differ considerably across selected rankings and even many indicators are unique, indicators referred to research and scientific productivity from university academic staff have a prominent role across all approaches. The implications of obtained data for main rankings consumers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. P. Merisotis, Summary report of the invitational roundtable on statistical indicators for the quality assessment of higher/tertiary education institutions: Ranking and league table methodologies, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 475–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. P. Merisotis, On the ranking of higher education institutions, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 361–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Federkeil, Some aspects of ranking methodology. The CHE-Ranking of German Universities, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Clarke, Quality assessment lessons from Australia and New Zeland, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. C. Liu, L. Liu, University rankings in China, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. BUELA-CASAL, Situación actual de la productividad científica de las universidades españolas, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5 (2005) 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. De Miguel, E. Vaquera, J. D. Sánchez, Spanish universities and the Ranking 2005 Initiative, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gil Roales-Nieto, Los estudios universitarios de Psicología en España. Análisis de su distribución geográfica, de la relación oferta-demanda y de la movilidad del alumnado, Internacional Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 5 (2005) 265–308.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Vaughn, Accreditation, commercial rankings, and new approaches to assessing the quality of university research and education programmes in the United States, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Yonezawa, I. Nakatsui, T. Kobayashi, University rankings in Japan, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Crespo, La cooperación en educación superior: la red iberoamericana para la acreditación de la calidad (RIACES), Revista Mexicana de Psicología 22 (2005) 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. R. Ledesma, Latin America: a different reality, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 467–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Eccles, The use of university rankings in the United Kingdom, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Jobbins, The Times/The Times Higher Education Supplement. League Tables in Britain: An insider’s view, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Siwinski, Perspektywy. Ten years of rankings, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. B. Filinov, S. Ruchkina, The ranking of higher education institutions in Russia: some methodological problems, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Academic Ranking of World Universities (2003) Retrieved on 1 June 2005 from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2003/2003main.htm

  18. N. C. Liu, Y. Cheng, The academic ranking of world universities, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Meredith, Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings, Research in Higher Education, 45 (2004) 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Tight, Do league tables contribute to the development of a quality culture? Football and higher education compared, Higher Education Quarterly, 54 (2000) 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. F. J. Van Raan, Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods, Scientometrics, 62 (2005) 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. I. Montero, O. G. León, Sistema de clasificación del método en los informes de investigación en Psicología, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5 (2005) 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. S. Webster, Academic Quality Rankings of American Colleges and Universities. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hispanic Magazine, The Top 25 Colleges for Latinos (2005) Retrieved on 1 June 2005 from http://www.hispaniconline.com/magazine/2005/march/Features/top25colleges.html

  25. World Universities’ Ranking on the WEB (2005) Retrieved on 1 June 2005 from http://www.webometrics.info/methodology_es.html

  26. Financial Times, MBA Rankings (2005) Retrieved on 1 June 2005 from http://rankings.ft.com/rankings/mba/rankings.html

  27. Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Academic Ranking of World Universities (2005) Retrieved on 1 June 2005 from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm

  28. The Times Higher Education Supplement, The Times Higher World University Rankings 2005 (2005) Retrieved on 21 November 2005 from http://www.thes.co.uk/worldrankings

  29. Center for Science and Technology Studies, CEST Scientometrics Rankings (2004) Retrieved on 1 June 2005 from http://adminsrv3.admin.ch/cest/en/aktuell.htm

  30. Asiaweek, Asia’s Best Universities 2000 (2000) Retrieved on 1 June de 2005 de http://www.asiaweek.com/asiaweek/features/universities2000/index.html

  31. Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación (ANECA), Programa de evaluación institucional. Guía de evaluación externa. Anexo II (2005) Retrieved on 3 May 2005 from http://www.aneca.es

  32. R. Finnie, A. Usher, Measuring the Quality of Post-Secondary Education: Concepts, Current Practices and a Strategic Plan, Canadian Policy Research Networks, Kingston, Ontario, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. P. Merisotis, J. Sadlak, Higher education rankings: Evolution, acceptance, and dialogue, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Clarke, Some guidelines for academic quality rankings, Higher Education in Europe, 27 (2002) 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. G. Buela-Casal, O. Gutiérrez-Martínez, Análisis de la relación entre doctorados con mención de calidad y otros criterios de productividad científica. Conference presented on Curso Evaluación y Acreditación de los Programas de Postgrado, Granada, Spain, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. N. Van Dyke, Twenty years of university report cards, Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2005) 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. G. Bela-Casal et al., Estudio comparativo de indicadores de calidad de las universidades, Manuscript in preparation, 2006.

  38. D. D. Dill, M. Soo, Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems, Higher Education, 49 (2005) 495–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Garfield, The meaning of the Impact Factor, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 (2003) 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  40. W. Glänzel, C. De Lange, A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration, Scientometrics, 54 (2002) 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Uzun, Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns: The case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics, Scientometrics, 61 (2004) 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. G. Buela-Casal, P. Perakakis, M. Taylor, P. Checa, Measuring internationality: reflections and perspectives on academic journals, Scientometrics, 67 (2006) 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. N. C. Liu, L. Liu, Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics. A comment to the “Fatal Atraction”, Scientometrics, 64 (2005) 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. F. J. Martos, Desafíos de la formación del postgrado en Iberoamérica en un mundo globalizado, Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 22 (2005) 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Gutiérrez-Martínez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M.P. et al. Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics 71, 349–365 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8

Keywords

Navigation