Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of 2, 765 articles published in four math journals from 1997 to 2005 indicate that articles deposited in the arXiv received 35% more citations on average than non-deposited articles (an advantage of about 1.1 citations per article), and that this difference was most pronounced for highly-cited articles. Open Access, Early View, and Quality Differential were examined as three non-exclusive postulates for explaining the citation advantage. There was little support for a universal Open Access explanation, and no empirical support for Early View. There was some inferential support for a Quality Differential brought about by more highly-citable articles being deposited in the arXiv. In spite of their citation advantage, arXiv-deposited articles received 23% fewer downloads from the publisher’s website (about 10 fewer downloads per article) in all but the most recent two years after publication. The data suggest that arXiv and the publisher’s website may be fulfilling distinct functional needs of the reader.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Lawrence, Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact, Nature, 411 (2001) 521. Available: http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v411/n6837/full/411521a0_fs.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. J. Schwarz, R. C. J. Kennicutt, Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 36 (2004) 1654–1663. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0411275

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. S. Metcalfe, The rise and citation impact of astro-ph in major journals, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 37 (2005) 555–557. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0503519

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Antelman, Do open-access articles have a greater research impact?, College & Research Libraries, 65 (2004) 372–382. Available: http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002309

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn, A. Accomazzi, C. Grant, M. Demleitner, E. Henneken, S. S. Murray, The effect of use and access on citations, Information Processing and Management, 41 (2005) 1395–1402. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0503029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Guthrie, Do two arbitrary processes have the same mean?, In: NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, NIST, 2005. Available: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section3/prc35.htm

  7. J. D. Gibbons, Nonparametric statistics: an introduction. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Vol. 90. 1993, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Guthrie, LOESS (aka LOWESS), In: NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, NIST, 2005. Available: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmd/section1/pmd144.htm

  9. W. G. Jacoby, Statistical graphics for univariate and bivariate data. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Vol. 117. 1997, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. F. Moed, Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (2005) 1088–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Lawrence, Online or invisible, NEC Research Institute, (2001). Available: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/online-nature01

  12. S. Harnad, T. Brody, Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals, D-Lib Magazine, 10 (2004). Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06hamad.html

  13. P. O. Seglen, The skewness of science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (1992) 628–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. D. Wren, Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the Internet, BMJ, 330 (2005) E-pub. Available: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/330/7500/1128

  15. P. M. Davis, J. S. Price, eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER., Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (2006) 1243–1248. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.IR/0602060

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cornell University Library, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Philip M. Davis & Michael J. Fromerth

Authors
  1. Philip M. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Fromerth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip M. Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, P.M., Fromerth, M.J. Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?. Scientometrics 71, 203–215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1661-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1661-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation