Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Better research quality not only inspires scholars to continue their research, but also increases the possibility of higher research budgets from sponsors. Given the importance of research quality, this study proposes that utilizing social capital (i.e., research collaboration) might be a promising avenue to achieve better research quality. In addition, as every scholar has his or her own expertise and knowledge, the diversity of collaborating members might be an extra resource for reinforcing research quality. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of research collaboration and member diversity on research quality, including the number of citations, the impact factor, and the size of the research award. To explore unknown associations, the author adopts two data sources, that is, the Social Science Citation Index database and academic database of a university, to verify the hypotheses. The results show that a higher intensity at which scholars are embedded in a collaboration network, results in higher research quality. However, member diversity does not seem to be a major concern during the organization of a research group. Research quality is not affected, regardless of whether a scholar collaborates with different or the same co-authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bollen, J., & Van de Sompel, H. (2008). Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(1), 136–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 5.0 version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C. (2008). The value of knowledge created by individual scientist and research groups. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(3), 274–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. (2005). Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. P., Ward, J. C., Kumar, A., & Reingen, P. H. (1999). Structural analysis of co-author relationships and author productivity in selected outlets for consumer behavior research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. W., Schroeder, D. M., & Finn, D. M. (1994). Only if I’m first author: Conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy Management Journal, 37(3), 734–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarifications. Social Network, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Ponds, R., & van Oort, F. (2010). The citation impact of research collaboration in science-based industries: A spatial-institutional analysis. Paper in Regional Science, 89(2), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. K., Rall, L. C., & Peterson, C. A. (2002). Lack of multidisciplinary collaboration is a barrier to outcomes research. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(1), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, Jr., K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and periphery effects in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 53(3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., Pettigrew, A., & Ferlie, E. (2002). The determinants of research group performance: Toward mode 2? Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 747–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman, R. (2005). How to be a successful scholar: Publish efficiently. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 36(2), 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(3), 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspective, 10(3), 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhaber, H., & Przednowek, K. (1976). Quality of research and the Nobel prizes. Social Studies of Science, 6(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, Jr., A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D., Zhao, M., & Calantone, R. J. (2006). Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March’s exploration-exploitation model. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 709–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. (2002). Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1149–1160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, K. (2005). Coauthorship dynamics and knowledge capital: The patterns of cross-disciplinary collaboration in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohniwa, R. L., Denawa, M., Kudo, M., Nakamura, K., & Takeyasu, K. (2004). Perspective factor: A novel indicator for the assessment of journal quality. Research Evaluation, 13(3), 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, C., & Summers, M. A. C. (2008). Citation counts and the research assessment exercise, part VI: Unit of assessment 67 (music). Information Research, 13(2). Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper342.html.

  • Pawar, M. (2006). “Social” “capital”? The Social Science Journal, 43(2), 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perretti, F., & Negro, G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 759–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39, 613–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, S. (1980). Collaboration and the quality of research. Social Studies of Science, 10(1), 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichers, A. E. (1987). An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, J., & Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34, 784–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderbaum, F. (2001). Networking and capacity building: The role of regional research networks in Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 13(2), 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 723–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 819–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, National Central University, No. 300, Jhongda Rd, Jhongli City, 32001, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chien Hsiang Liao

Authors
  1. Chien Hsiang Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien Hsiang Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liao, C.H. How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks. Scientometrics 86, 747–761 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation