Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We trace the structural patterns of co-authorship between Korean researchers at three institutional types (university, government, and industry) and their international partners in terms of the mutual information generated in these relations. Data were collected from the Web of Science during the period 1968–2009. The traditional Triple-Helix indicator was modified to measure the evolving network of co-authorship relations. The results show that international co-authorship relations have varied considerably over time and with changes in government policies, but most relations have become stable since the early 2000s. In other words, the national publication system of Korea has gained some synergy from R&D internationalization during the 1990s, but the development seems to stagnate particularly at the national level: whereas both university and industrial collaborations are internationalized, the cross-connection within Korea has steadily eroded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2007). The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76, 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, S. J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Paula, E., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, E. M. (2001). Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: Notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 55(4), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2007). Empires of knowledge and development. In P. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, H. J. (2006). Characteristics and transformation of Korean academic science: Focusing on the trend of academic R&D expenditure since 1980s. Social Theory, 30, 213–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., & Glänzel, W. (1996). International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European Research? Scientometrics, 36(2), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. (2005). Catch up through international linkage, science, technology and the Korean experience. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. H., & Seol, S. S. (2010). Stages and drivers for the development of basic scientific research in Korea. Korean Journal of Technology Innovation Society, 13(3), 587–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(22), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L. (1998). Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27(6), 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51, 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship, Chapter 11. In Moed, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29(2), 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, I., Bordons, M., Fernández, M. T., & Morillo, F. (2009). Structure and research performance of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 79(1), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. D. (1980). A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publications. Scientometrics, 2, 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. L. (2009). International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2151–2164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. (2007). International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Science Technology Human Values, 33, 101–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakulin, A., & Bratko, I. (2004). Quantifying and visualizing attribute interactions: An approach based on entropy. Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.AI/0308002.

  • Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. M. (1996). A systemic view of British Science. Scientometrics, 35, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KICOS. (2008). Statistics on International R&D Program. Seoul: Korea Foundation for International Cooperation of Science and Technology.

  • Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J., Yeo, M. S., & Oh, D. (2010). Measuring the quality of research performance by relative rank-normalized impact factor (R2nIF). Asian Research Policy, 1, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2009). Information of interactions in complex systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38(6), 669–680.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K. S. (2009, Feb 27). Emergence of research and entrepreneurial activities of Korean universities. Paper presented at the conference on university-industry linkages and economic performance, College of Social Science, Seoul National University.

  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Kim, K., Choi, Y., Song, C., & Kim, E. (2008). Exploratory study on the international S&T cooperation with developing countries. Washington, DC: Science and Technology Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, G. A. (2010). The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks. Iberoamerican Countries (1973–2006). arXiv:1001.2837v1.

  • Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Redundancy in systems which entertain a model of themselves: Interaction information and the self-organization of anticipation. Entropy, 12(1), 63–79. doi:10.3390/e12010063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). How do emerging technologies conquer the world? An exploration of patterns of diffusion and network formation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 846–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19(2), 97–116.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorship. Scientometrics, 36, 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOE. (1974). Report on students studying abroad. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Education.

  • MOST. (2001). 2000 Science and technology annual. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.

  • MOST. (2003). The 20 years of HAN Project. Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology.

  • Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information, and patents—ten year trends. The Serials Librarian, 21(2), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSF-NSB. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Board, National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordonez, G. (2008). International research collaboration, research team performance, and scientific and technological capabilities in Colombia—a bottom-up perspective. PhD dissertation in public policy. Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3), 439–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39, 640–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometrics values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R. (2009). The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 76–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28, 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, J., & Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34(6), 784–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84(2), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M., So, M. H., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. A special issue on Triple Helix, 22(7), 845–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85, 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, W., & Campion, P. (2000). Are scientists in developing countries isolated? Science Technology Society, 5, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 593–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration of the impact of the research results. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., & Wong, A. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries? Prepared for the World Bank, RAND.

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Measuring the globalization of knowledge networks. Blue sky. Manuscript submitted in September 2006, p. 12.

  • Yim, D., Kim, K., Chung, S., & Lee, J. (2008), Globalization of science and technology and the responses of the Korean government. In Summer conference of Korean Technology Innovation Society, South Korea.

  • Yu, S., Yim, D., Park, I., & Youn, J. (1999). A policy research on Korea’s international cooperative R&D activities. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, M., & Ahn, K. (2002). The characteristics of structure and level of science activity in Korea: An analysis by SCI. Seoul: STEPI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge a support from the Social Science Korea (SSK) Program funded by National Research Foundation of South Korea; NRF-2010-330-B00232.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Adminstration, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 712-701, South Korea

    Ki-Seok Kwon

  2. Department of Media & Communication, YeungNam University, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 712-749, South Korea

    Han Woo Park

  3. Office of Academic Information, Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, 305-701, South Korea

    Minho So

  4. Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Loet Leydesdorff

Authors
  1. Ki-Seok Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Han Woo Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minho So
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Loet Leydesdorff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Woo Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, KS., Park, H.W., So, M. et al. Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics 90, 163–176 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation