Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Researchers profile, co-authorship pattern and knowledge organization in information science in Brazil

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aimed to present the profile of the researchers, the pattern of scientific collaboration and the knowledge organization in the area of information science in Brazil. The study covered sex differences, skills by region and type of institution, academic formation, indicators of productivity, relations of co-authorship, interactions with other fields of knowledge, and sectors of application of the researches developed in the area. The survey, covering the period 2000–2010, was based on information from the curricula vitae of the researchers with Research Productivity Grant funded by a government agency and from the Directory of Research Group of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. The results revealed that the majority of the researchers are women, both in research and postgraduate; there is a significant regional asymmetry; the studies are concentrated in public universities; the papers are published mainly in national journals with open access; the scientific production follows the same pattern of the areas of humanities, social sciences, and linguistics, literature and arts; there is a tendency of increasing the incidence and extent of co-authored papers; there is interaction with other 20 areas of knowledge, which are directly or indirectly connected, forming a single component that comprises all of them; and ‘information and S&T management’ followed by ‘education’ are the main sectors of application of the studies developed by the Brazilian researchers. The study therefore showed an overview of this scientific community seeking to contribute to a better understanding of its characteristics and specificities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aharony, N. (2012). Library and information science research areas: a content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007–8. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 44(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in library and information science viewed through the web of knowledge: the Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bufrem, L. S., Gabriel Junior, R. F., & Gonçalves, V. (2010). Práticas de co-autoria no processo de comunicação científica na pós-graduação em ciência da informação no Brasil. Inf. Inf., 15, 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, C. G., & Barbastefano, R. G. (2011). Knowledge diffusion and collaboration networks on life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(6), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, A. L., & Lanzoni, G. M. M. (2008). Características dos grupos de pesquisa da enfermagem brasileira certificados pelo CNPq de 2005 a 2007. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm, 12(2), 316–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, W. R., Cendón, B. V., & Araújo, C. A. A. (2011). Ciência da informação e áreas correlatas: um estudo de caso na Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Brazilian Journal of Information Science, 5(1), 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les Choses. Une Arquéologie des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, M.Y.F.S. de F. (2009). Desafios Atuais da Ciência da Informação no Brasil. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 14(3), 190–205.

  • Hawkins, D.T. (2001). Bibliometrics of electronic journals in information science. Information Research, 7(1). http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper120.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2012.

  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2011). A study of interdisciplinarity in information science: using direct citation and co-authorship analysis. Journal of Information Science, 37(4), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2012). A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science. Scientometrics, 91(3), 789–803.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I., & Cano, V. (2008). Electronic publishing in librarianship and information science in Latin America—a step towards development? Information Research, 13(1). http://InformationR.net/ir/13-1/paper331.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2012.

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1997). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science metrics more scientific. Nature, 464, 488–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, P., Mugnaini, R., & Leta, J. (2011). A new indicator for international visibility: exploring Brazilian scientific community. Scientometrics, 88(1), 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteleto, R. M. (2009). A pesquisa em Ciência da Informação no Brasil: marcos institucionais, cenários e perspectivas. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 14(especial number), 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCTI—Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. (2012). Indicadores—Comparações internacionais. http://www.mcti.gov.br/index.php/content/view/740.html?execview. Accessed 8 Aug 2012.

  • Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing Asian scholarly research in library and information science: a quantitative view as reflected in web of knowledge. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, L. V. R. (2000). Infra-estrutura da pesquisa em Ciência da Informação no Brasil. DataGramaZero—Revista de Ciência da Informação, 1(6), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, L.V.R. (2006). A ciência da Informação: desdobramentos disciplinares, interdisciplinares e transdisciplinares. In: Gonzàles de Gómez, M.N., Orrico, E.G.D. (Org.). Políticas de memória e informação: reflexos na organização do conhecimento (pp. 111–141). Natal: UFRN Edit.

  • Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prebor, G. (2010). Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(4), 256–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1992). Interdisciplinarity: approaches to understanding library and information science as an interdisciplinary field. In: P. Vakkari & B. Cronin (Eds.), Conceptions of library and Information Science: historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 253–267). London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanz, S.A. de S., & Stump, I.R.C. (2010). Colaboração científica: revisão teórico-conceitual. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 15(2), 42–55.

  • Vasconcelos, S. M. R., Sorenson, M. M., & Leta, J. (2009). A new indicator for the assessment of Science & technology research? Scientometrics, 80(1), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilan Filho, J. L., de Souza, H. B., & Mueller, S. (2008). Artigos de periódicos científicos das áreas de informação no Brasil: evolução da produção e da autoria múltipla. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 13(2), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Centre for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca, CEFET/RJ, Av. Maracanã, 229, Bloco E, 5º. Andar, Sala E506, DIPPG, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20271-110, Brazil

    Cristina Gomes de Souza & Marta Lúcia Azevedo Ferreira

Authors
  1. Cristina Gomes de Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Lúcia Azevedo Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Gomes de Souza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Souza, C.G., Ferreira, M.L.A. Researchers profile, co-authorship pattern and knowledge organization in information science in Brazil. Scientometrics 95, 673–687 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0882-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0882-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation