Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does academic collaboration equally benefit impact of research across topics? The case of agricultural, resource, environmental and ecological economics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we analyse the effects of different types of formal collaboration and research topics on research impact of academic articles in the area of agricultural, resource, environmental, and ecological economics. The research impact is measured by the number of times an article has been cited each year since publication. The topics within the area of research are modelled using latent semantic analysis. We distinguish between the effect of institutional, national, and international collaboration. We use statistical models for count data and control for the impacts of journals, publication year, and years since publication. We find that, holding other factors constant, collaboration in the form of co-authorship increases research impact. The effect of inter-institutional collaboration within same country is similar to the effect of collaboration within same institution. However, international collaboration results in additional increase in impact. We find that the topic of a paper substantially influences number of citations and identified which topics are associated with greater impact. The effects of different types of collaboration on citations also vary across topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albarrán, P., Carrasco, R., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2017). Geographic mobility and research productivity in a selection of top world economics departments. Scientometrics, 111(1), 241–265. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2245-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Stuart, T., & Wang, Y. (2013). Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Science, 60(1), 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4–5), 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D. S., & Scrogin, D. O. (2000). Reflections upon 25 years of the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(3), 249–263. doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1114.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brorsen, B. W. (2009). Research: Are we valuing the right stuff? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 34(1), 1–10.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M., & Phimister, E. (1996). The ranking of agricultural economics journals. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47(1), 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., Maggioni, M. A., Uberti, T. E., & de Felice, A. (2015). The strength of strong ties: How co-authorship affect productivity of academic economists? Scientometrics, 102(1), 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H., Cox, R. A., & Kim, K. A. (2009). On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: Evidence from the finance academe. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 893–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Howarth, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., Liu, S., Ma, C., Plumecocq, G., et al. (2016). Influential publications in ecological economics revisited. Ecological Economics, 123, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debertin, D. L., & Pagoulatos, A. (1992). Research in agricultural economics 1919–1990: Seventy-two years of change. Review of Agricultural Economics, 14(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861–873. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelopoulos, N., Zhang, X., & Prybutok, V. R. (2012). Latent semantic analysis: Five methodological recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 70–86. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnas, G. W., Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Harshman, R. A., & Streeter, L. A., et al. (1988). Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 1988 (pp. 465–480). ACM.

  • Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115. doi:10.1023/A:1010512628145.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, T.-E. S., & Jørgensen, F. (2014). Citation counts in transportation research. European Transport Research Review, 6(2), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952–965. doi:10.1002/asi.10291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilmer, C. E., & Lusk, J. L. (2009). Determinants of citations to the agricultural and applied economics association journals. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(4), 677–694. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01461.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoepner, A. G. F., Kant, B., Scholtens, B., & Yu, P. S. (2012). Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions. Ecological Economics, 77, 193–206. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653–661. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0412-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, C. D., Carraro, C., Kahn, M. E., & Stavins, R. (2011). The impact of REEP. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 1–2. doi:10.1093/reep/req025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1995). Team production in economics: Division of labor or mentoring? Labour Economics, 2(1), 33–40. doi:10.1016/0927-5371(95)80005-i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2006). Alphabetized coauthorship. Applied Economics, 38(14), 1649–1653. doi:10.1080/00036840500427007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najman, J. M., & Hewitt, B. (2003). The validity of publication and citation counts for sociology and other selected disciplines. Journal of Sociology, 39(1), 62–80. doi:10.1177/144078330303900106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, C., & Grijalva, T. (2011). Trends in co-authorship in economics since 1985. Applied Economics, 43(28), 4369–4375. doi:10.1080/00036846.2010.491458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2, 902. doi:10.1038/srep00902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13(C), 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyakov, M., Chalak, M., Iftekhar, M. S., Pandit, R., Tapsuwan, S., Zhang, F., et al. (2017). Authorship, collaboration, topics, and research gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015. Environmental and Resource Economics. doi:10.1007/s10640-017-0147-2. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyakov, M., Gibson, F. L., & Pannell, D. J. (2016). Antipodean agricultural and resource economics at 60: Trends in topics, authorship and collaboration. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60(4), 506–515. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priam, T. T., Maillot, N. E., Lim, J. H., & Chevallet, J. P. (2007). Latent semantic fusion model for image retrieval and annotation. In International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 2007 (pp. 439–444). doi:10.1145/1321440.1321503.

  • Qiu, Y. (2016). Package ‘RSpectra’: Solvers for Large Scale Eigenvalue and SVD Problems (0.11-0 ed.). CRAN.

  • Robson, B. J., & Mousquès, A. (2016). Can we predict citation counts of environmental modelling papers? Fourteen bibliographic and categorical variables predict less than 30% of the variability in citation counts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 75, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, S., Verbeke, T., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Evaluating environmental and resource economics journals: A TOP-curve approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), 270–287. doi:10.1093/reep/rep002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24(5), 513–523. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schymura, M., & Löschel, A. (2014). Incidence and extent of co-authorship in environmental and resource economics: Evidence from the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Scientometrics, 99(3), 631–661. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1248-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergi, B., Parker, R., & Zuckerman, B. (2014). Support for international collaboration in research: The role of the overseas offices of basic science funders. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 430–453. doi:10.1111/ropr.12088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 32(3), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sin, S. C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1770–1783. doi:10.1002/asi.21572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849–1857. doi:10.1002/asi.23515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876–889. doi:10.1002/asi.23236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2013). Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 265–271. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visinescu, L. L., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2014). Orthogonal rotations in latent semantic analysis: An empirical study. Decision Support Systems, 62, 131–143. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62(1), 3–26. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0001-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westgate, M. J., Barton, P. S., Pierson, J. C., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2015). Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 29(6), 1606–1614. doi:10.1111/cobi.12605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winson-Geideman, K., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2013). Research in real estate, 1973–2010: A three-journal comparison. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 21(2), 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants at the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society conference in Rotorua, New Zealand for their helpful feedback. Funding support from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions is gratefully acknowledged. Useful comments from the Editor and two anonymous Reviewers have greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Maksym Polyakov & Md Sayed Iftekhar

  2. Distributed eLibrary, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar

    Serhiy Polyakov

Authors
  1. Maksym Polyakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serhiy Polyakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md Sayed Iftekhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maksym Polyakov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polyakov, M., Polyakov, S. & Iftekhar, M.S. Does academic collaboration equally benefit impact of research across topics? The case of agricultural, resource, environmental and ecological economics. Scientometrics 113, 1385–1405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2523-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2523-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation