Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female Subtypes

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expressions of hostile and benevolent sexism toward a female character whose behavior was consistent with either a positive (i.e., chaste) or negative (i.e., promiscuous) sexual female subtype were examined. Consistent with the theory that benevolent and hostile sexism form complementary ideologies that serve to maintain and legitimize gender-based social hierarchies, men expressed increased hostile, but decreased benevolent,sexism toward a female character who fit a negative subtype, whereas they expressed increased benevolent, but decreased hostile, sexism toward a female character who fit a positive subtype that was consistent with traditional gender roles. Furthermore, men’s sexual self-schema moderated expressions of hostile sexism across subtypes, whichsuggests that men who think of themselves in sexual terms (i.e., those who are sexuallyschematic) may be predisposed to (a) interpret information about women in sexual terms and categorize women into positive or negative sexual female subtypes on the basis of limited information, which leads to (b) increased hostile sexist attributions when womenare perceived as fitting a negative sexual subtype. These findings emphasize the role of both social dominance motives and the more subtle sociocognitive processes underlyinggender stereotyping in the expression of ambivalent sexism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, A., & Harnish, R. J. (1995). Perception of sexual intent: The role of gender, alcohol consumption, and rape supportive attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Espindle, D. (1999). Men’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 645–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach for representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 679–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (2001). Should we take “gender” out of gender subtypes? The effects of gender, evaluative valence, and context on the organization of person subtypes. Sex Roles, 45, 455–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranowski, J. M., & Andersen, B. L. (1998). Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1364–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranowski, J. M. & Andersen, B. L. (2000). Evidence of self-schematic cognitive processing in women with differing sexual self-views. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 519–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (1994a). Explorations in gender cognition: Content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (1994b). Features of men, features of women: Assessing stereotypic beliefs about gender subtypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (2001). Ambivalenter sexismus und die polarisierung von geschlechterstereotypen [Ambivalent sexism and the polarization of gender stereotypes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, S. (1992). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, G. T., & Markus, H. (1982). Self-schemas and judgments about others. Social Cognition, 1, 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Holmgren, K. M. (2003). The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women’s and men’s perceptions of the menstruating woman. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, L. T. (1999). The certainty of the sexual self-concept. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, L. T., & Kushnier, K. (1987). Sexual inferences about female targets: The use of sexual experience correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2002). Ambivalent responses. American Psychologist, 57, 444–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B., & Fraidin, S. N. (2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendzierski, D., Sheffield, A., & Morganstein, M. S. (2002). The role of self-schema in attributions for own versus other’s exercise lapse. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, P. (1983). Self-image bias in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, P. (1984). Self -schema and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1177–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemas on the perception of others. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlström (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction(pp. 233–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pek, J. C. X., & Leong, F. T. L. (2003). Sex-related self- concepts, cognitive styles, and cultural values of traditionality-modernity as predictors of general and domain-specific sexism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrocelli, J. V. (2002). Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Where’s the ambivalence? American Psychologist, 57, 443–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vélez-Blasini, C. J., & Brandt, H. J. (2000). Expectancies, setting, age, and beverage choice as predictors of sexual behaviors in hypothetical dating situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1954–1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

    Chris G. Sibley & Marc Stewart Wilson

Authors
  1. Chris G. Sibley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Stewart Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris G. Sibley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sibley, C.G., Wilson, M.S. Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female Subtypes. Sex Roles 51, 687–696 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x

Search

Navigation